rats19 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 9:45 pm
Something will change pretty quick I think … trade or trades…
Got us a point POC
Keeping optimistic by only watching for what Hughes does.
Petey and Miller might bring the drama, but they are far from this team’s biggest problem.
The baldies need to make a move to get a defensemen that can complete a pass or at least clear the zone without giving the puck straight back to the other team.
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
rats19 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 9:45 pm
Something will change pretty quick I think … trade or trades…
Got us a point POC
Keeping optimistic by only watching for what Hughes does.
Petey and Miller might bring the drama, but they are far from this team’s biggest problem.
The baldies need to make a move to get a defensemen that can complete a pass or at least clear the zone without giving the puck straight back to the other team.
Petey and Miller are far from this team's biggest problem on the ice. However, the spillover is going to have an impact and we might be seeing that in the fringe guys who struggle to play reliable minutes and are finding it a distraction that they aren't good enough to overcome. Myers and Soucy are reliable NHL defensemen, probably good enough to be the #4 beside a good #3.....right now they are consistently playing like #6 defensemen. There's an effect.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 7:50 pm
Thank god for the GOAT... because AHLers and 7/8 dmen in the lineup every night is why the offensive chances and goals have dried up for this team.
Miller vs Pettersson is an easy distraction. Juulsen, Desharnais, Friedman, Brannstrom playing... Myers, Soucy, Forbort with expanded roles... that is the real problem that mgmt has to resolve.
agree with this^^
we're in win-now mode but we simply don't have enough skill in the lineup, and I don't see how that changes enough to be a real cup competitor.
Miller did not look good on the shorty or the ot winner. He looked good elsewhere in the game but he simply can't be so fucking relaxed in coverage. With so many other things going wrong, it really sucks we have the lazy Miller this year.
Raile wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:27 pm
Miller did not look good on the shorty or the ot winner. He looked good elsewhere in the game but he simply can't be so fucking relaxed in coverage. With so many other things going wrong, it really sucks we have the lazy Miller this year.
Meandering Miller and Pouting Pete.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
This “apparent” problem in the room doesn’t seem to be getting healed. The team is off. Hughes has been bringing it every game, every shift while “ some” of his mates are indifferent. I worry Quinn is gonna say “fuck it, why bother.” If Hughes starts to not caring, this team is fucked, he’s saving this club by himself. If there’s a problem, management cannot let it fester, deal with it, nip it, get rid of it and find guys who want to play for each other. Tocchet seems to be beside himself in press meetings.
donlever wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2024 9:42 am
If Quinn says "fuck it, why bother" then he is not the man or player we think he is and should not be wearing a C.
While I agree with this in principle, one must recall that everyone is human.
I also agree that Hughes is a "climber".
Based on those two statements the worry I have is that if management doesn't do something about this situation then Quinn's "fuck it" likely looks like him continuing to carry and lead the team for another two seasons, after this one, and then continuing "his climb" with another team.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
donlever wrote: ↑Sun Dec 22, 2024 12:49 pm
Then he's a quitter.
Regardless of the cause of this situation, if it is something that requires management to intervene in order for it to get sorted, and they fail to do that, then I wouldn't call anyone a quitter who decides to simply move on when his contract is up. Quitting would be requesting a trade or phoning it in at practice and games.....just my opinion.
It would be typical Canuck front office nonsense though. All but force your best player out of town by failing to deal with a situation.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..