Mëds wrote: ↑Mon Dec 15, 2025 2:51 pm
No. I wasn’t suggesting that at all. The opposite in fact. I said in general when…..I meant that this trade was an exception to that generality. Which is why I’m more optimistic about it 24 hours later and given more info.
But I’ll continue to post vaguely if it keeps you posting even just for clarification sake.
Thank fuck, I know we usually haven’t seen eye to eye on a lot but that would have been a whole new level. And yeah, as long as you keep the Don Cherry circa 1993 takes coming I’ll probably have to register my disagreement whenever I stop in
Speaking of Sherwood
Rumour has it that Minnesota offered Ohgren straight up for Sherwood a few weeks back and Canucks turned them down. I wonder what they would offer now?
dbr wrote: ↑Mon Dec 15, 2025 5:05 pm
And yeah, as long as you keep the Don Cherry circa 1993 takes coming I’ll probably have to register my disagreement whenever I stop in
From Gary Mason - “Eliotte Friedman Friedman is absolutely right. The dressing feud led to the implosion of a promising group and ultimately the departure of Hughes as much as some in the market don’t want to hear that.”
Eliotte Friedman - “They will look back at that, and they will say, ‘Man, that’s a tough way to lose a good team.’”
Pettersson is next, he needs to go. If we want to clean house of the toxic bullshit of the last two years, Petey needs to be shown the door. He’s a constant reminder of the shit show, there’s no erasing that.
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Mon Dec 15, 2025 6:53 pm
Pettersson is next, he needs to go. If we want to clean house of the toxic bullshit of the last two years, Petey needs to be shown the door. He’s a constant reminder of the shit show, there’s no erasing that.
Agree and I've defended that skinny little fuck forever. GTFO and don't let the door hit you on the ass.
The lot of them needed to be flushed. I'm hoping he's the last sour apple in the bag