NHL business

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Post Reply
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3403
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by SKYO »

Hockey Widow wrote:Not really NHL business but:

http://www.reviewjournal.com/sports/nhl ... er-analyst

We will no longer have General Fanager to go to. Now there's a program the NHL should have bought.

It's so much better than what they currently offer.

CapFriendly is way better anyways. :mrgreen:

https://www.capfriendly.com/
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by Hockey Widow »

NHL GM meetings looking at a couple of changes:

Bringing back the blind side hit language. GMs split, as Bob McKenzies says, between the doves who want to reinstate the language and offer more protection, and the Hawks who want more hitting and fear reinstating the language will take hits out of the game. Doves want to add stiffer penalties for any head contact.

Adopt the IIHF shoot out rules. Teams announce their three shooters. If still no winner teams can pick anyone to shoot, even the same player over and over. This will allow fans to see the dynamic players shoot more and eliminate the 12 player shoot out that sees scrubs taking shots in later rounds.

Releasing, in conjunction with hockey Canada, a new 5-20 year old minor hockey development program. One of the concepts is to move to a 19 year old draft with exceptional circumstances allowed. So franchise type players could still be drafted at 18. The language and exceptional circumstances still need to be defined. NHLA PA needs to sign off. PA is split. Some see it as a way to keep vets in the game a little longer while keeping average salaries up. Some see it as an infringement of a players rights.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 7720
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: NHL business

Post by Topper »

Missing

A clarification of expansion draft rules. I read this morning that some GM's were taken by surprise by the leak that Vegas would have an early window to negotiate with FA's. Some wondering what if Vegas came to an agreement but did not sign the player until after July 1. that team would then have lost 2 players.

Vegas isn't at the meeting as their franchise fees have yet to be paid in full. Last instalment is expected in the new year.

A few comments;

Shootout, fans hate it, which was the reason for 3 on 3, why try to make it exciting. Personally, I like it when goes 5-6 rounds and gets to the lessor lights. Would it be called the Oshie-Josi rule?

Blindsides.....concussion lawsuit has to be a major consideration, or are they that smart?

Draft age, when push comes to shove, rookies go under the NHLPA bus. Crafting an exception rule will be near impossible, What year is a team to tank if the top player may not be available? Will 18yr olds not except file for loss of wages and restricted trade? What of the GM who has traded for what he believes will be high draft pick targeting several player's draft year and one of those players, the cream say, has been taken the year before, or not eligible until the year after?
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by Hockey Widow »

Good feedback Topper.

Maybe they need to make Vegas declare what FA they want to speak to with a provision that if they fail to sign any FA they speak with in that window they are prevented from signing them for one year, or something like that.

I agree re shootouts. I like seeing lesser players get a chance to be hero. Adds to the fun. It's already a gimmick so I don't want to give an advantage to teams that have 1-2 shootout Warriors.

Re the draft, I don't see 18 year olds suing as having much success. As far as making the change, make it 2-3 years in the future so GMs have time to adjust with respect to trading draft picks and being able to utilize any picks they have already acquired. Personally I think it is in the best interests of most 18 year olds anyway. And if it makes a tanking strategy more risky than all the better.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4999
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: NHL business

Post by Mickey107 »

And the NHL comes up with something I didn't see coming.

The NHL can go to the Olympics if the CBA is extended three years. W/E.
"evolution"
User avatar
2Fingers
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2152
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:47 am

Re: NHL business

Post by 2Fingers »

If 18 year olds can sue then why can't 17 year olds?
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 7720
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: NHL business

Post by Topper »

Reefer2 wrote:If 18 year olds can sue then why can't 17 year olds?
The difference is, some 18 year olds may be draft eligible, some not. It is not an across the board age cut off.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by Hockey Widow »

NHL release a final list of players exempt from the expansion draft due to full NMC and that must be protected by their respective teams. Players of course are free to waive.

Anaheim (4)
Kevin Bieksa
Ryan Getzlaf
Ryan Kesler
Corey Perry

Arizona (1)
Alex Goligoski

Boston (4)
David Backes
Patrice Bergeron
Zdeno Chara
David Krejci

Buffalo (1)
Kyle Okposo

Carolina (1)
Jordan Staal

Columbus (5)
Sergei Bobrovsky
David Clarkson
Brandon Dubinsky
Nick Foligno
Scott Hartnell

Chicago (8)
Artem Anisimov
Corey Crawford
Niklas Hjalmarsson
Marian Hossa
Patrick Kane
Duncan Keith
Brent Seabrook
Jonathan Toews

Colorado (2)
Francois Beauchemin
Erik Johnson

Dallas (2)
Jamie Benn
Jason Spezza

Detroit (1)
Frans Nielsen

Edmonton (3)
Milan Lucic
Andrej Sekera
Cam Talbot

Florida (1)
Keith Yandle

Los Angeles (1)
Anze Kopitar

Minnesota (4)
Mikko Koivu
Zach Parise
Jason Pominville
Ryan Suter

Montreal (2)
Jeff Petry
Carey Price

Nashville (1)
Pekka Rinne

New Jersey (1)
Ryane Clowe

N.Y. Islanders (3)
Johnny Boychuk
Andrew Ladd
John Tavares

N.Y. Rangers (4)
Dan Girardi
Henrik Lundqvist
Rick Nash
Marc Staal

Ottawa (1)
Dion Phaneuf

Philadelphia (1)
Claude Giroux

Pittsburgh (5)
Sidney Crosby
Marc-Andre Fleury
Phil Kessel
Kris Letang
Evgeni Malkin

Tampa Bay (4)
Ryan Callahan
Valtteri Filppula
Victor Hedman
Steven Stamkos

Toronto (1)
Nathan Horton

Vancouver (3)
Loui Eriksson
Daniel Sedin
Henrik Sedin

Winnipeg (2)
Dustin Byfuglien
Toby Enstrom

The NHL in conjunction with the NHPA reviewed every player contract believed to hold NMC trade protection. Because many had various window and trigger clauses some players thought exempt are not and some, like Nash, still need protection. The NHL website contains the full article.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3403
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by SKYO »

Hockey Widow wrote:NHL release a final list of players exempt from the expansion draft due to full NMC and that must be protected by their respective teams. Players of course are free to waive.



Chicago (8)
Artem Anisimov
Corey Crawford
Niklas Hjalmarsson
Marian Hossa
Patrick Kane
Duncan Keith
Brent Seabrook
Jonathan Toews
Christ, Bowman handing out NMC's like Gillis did with NTC's.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by Aaronp18 »

SKYO wrote: Christ, Bowman handing out NMC's like Gillis did with NTC's.
2010, 2013, 2015

We could hand out NMCs like Halloween candy if that was the result and I could care less!
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3403
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by SKYO »

Aaronp18 wrote:
SKYO wrote: Christ, Bowman handing out NMC's like Gillis did with NTC's.
2010, 2013, 2015

We could hand out NMCs like Halloween candy if that was the result and I could care less!

Touché ha.....all we need is a 1st overall pick (like this draft) to build upon ala Patrick Kane to start that NMC trend. 8-)
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by Aaronp18 »

SKYO wrote:
Aaronp18 wrote:
SKYO wrote: Christ, Bowman handing out NMC's like Gillis did with NTC's.
2010, 2013, 2015

We could hand out NMCs like Halloween candy if that was the result and I could care less!

Touché ha.....all we need is a 1st overall pick (like this draft) to build upon ala Patrick Kane to start that NMC trend. 8-)
We're going to have to sacrifice more than post-less board members for that to happen with the NHL's newest darling Vegas, NHL aided Arizona, and Toronto looking to have strong lottery odds as well. Not to mention the recently relocated Islanders.

We could finish with the worst record and I'd wager the draft order being something like Arizona, Vegas, TO then Vancouver.
User avatar
SKYO
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3403
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:34 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by SKYO »

Deadmonton won FOUR - 1st overall picks over the NHL darling teams.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4999
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: NHL business

Post by Mickey107 »

SKYO wrote:Deadmonton won FOUR - 1st overall picks over the NHL darling teams.
With a spattering of 2nd & 3rd overalls too, but look at how they drafted.
Eberle, Hall, Nugent-Hopkins, S. Ganger, Yakapov and on and on.
Lots of elan (flair) but none of them could beat their way out of a wet paper bag.
Oh! There's the guy with the most points, let's take him.
I won't count McDavid, anybody would have taken him.
"evolution"
User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: NHL business

Post by Aaronp18 »

SKYO wrote:Deadmonton won FOUR - 1st overall picks over the NHL darling teams.
Don't be mistaken, Edmonton is a darling team. They were a dynasty and have 5 Cups, the league didn't want them folding and losing them. They were also trying to help Katz get funding for a new arena!

The NHL needed and still wants Edmonton to be successful.
Post Reply