My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.Strangelove wrote:
............how did you get that picture yesturday?.........
Moderator: Referees
My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.Strangelove wrote:
Hollow whiskey bottle theory ?Topper wrote:My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.Strangelove wrote:
............how did you get that picture yesturday?.........
You should watch it, it's the right way to play.ukcanuck wrote: lol I did start watching but its three hours long its going to take a lot of skiving at work to get through it all.
I don't think you were paying much attention to my responseukcanuck wrote: I don't think you were paying much attention to my video because the "doofus" addresses your theory of "fixing the video images before hand
Re-read my post.ukcanuck wrote: He points out that in 1969 it virtually impossible in practical terms to transfer 147 minutes of slow-mo moon walk filmed in a studio on high speed 35 mm film then transfer it to video without all kinds of detectable flaws. He lists them all including a thing called gate weave which is produced by the 35mm film wobbling slightly as it spools through the video lens on the telecine (the machine that transfers film to video). Digital image stabilization can correct this today ( you could probably do it on a mac book) but in 1969 the digital technology did not exist.
He does NOT in FACT address the idea satisfactorily.ukcanuck wrote: so he does in FACT address the idea of prerecording on film and transferring to video for a "live broadcast"
So you see, your dufus has his facts wrong and his video is, in essence: gobbledygook.
SUMMARY:
Did NASA have the technology to fake the moon walk videos in 1969? Of course they did! But with the release of a certain video by SG Collins, a large number of deniers have claimed otherwise. This response should set the record straight.
In summary, Collins claims that there were no high speed video cameras in 1969. False. High speed video cameras first came into existence in the early 1960s and the fastest they could shoot at was 60fps.
http://www.motionvideoproducts.com/faqs.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_photography
Collins then says that the Ampex HS-100 magnetic disk recorder, which was used for slow motion instant sports relays, could only store 30 seconds of footage. Irrelevant. You could just as easily feed recordings from videotape into the disk recorder piece by piece and then record its slow motion playback on a second videotape.
And finally, Collins says that shooting on 35mm film and then converting those recordings to videotape would require five (actually six) 1,000 ft magazines, and then a series of cutting, splicing, and transferring. This is true, but also irrelevant. The entire Apollo 11 EVA (if broadcast at 10fps - see below) could fit on a single 2,300 ft magazine of 16mm film - you know, the type of film specifically used for television.
Also unveiled is a new discovery that the Apollo 11 moonwalk was broadcast, not at 10fps as claimed, but more likely at 24fps. This revelation further throws into doubt the official story since it shows the moonwalk was recorded using equipment that reportedly wasn't in their possession when they departed Earth.
I present various ideas for discussion purposes as to degree of possibility.ukcanuck wrote:
As for your position, its been pretty much the same "we did not go to the moon" since before the great migration and at least two conspiracy threads...
Here's a not-too-shitty theory.Topper wrote:My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.Strangelove wrote:
............how did you get that picture yesturday?.........
Really makes you wonder how many new people actually want to do that?Strangelove wrote:
A logic scheme once upon a time designed to bring freedom to the masses (by using reason to discover Truth)rats19 wrote:Hegelian Dialectic ......
ironic and working...Strangelove wrote:A logic scheme once upon a time designed to bring freedom to the masses (by using reason to discover Truth)rats19 wrote:Hegelian Dialectic ......
... now purported by some to have been perverted by... them ... allegedly to strip away freedom.
(strip away freedom whilst providing a false sense of freedom?)
Ironic, ain't it?
Hmmm... so this hypothetical dark matter can bring about climate change (an ice age) here on Earth?Topper wrote:http://news.nationalpost.com/news/dark- ... human-life
Dark matter's wobbling disk dislodged an asteroid leading to the K-T boundary event and subsequent mass extinction.
Cool
I can hardly wait until The Donald gets his hands on the launch codes!Arachnid wrote:Bitter pill now that the US minions can sue them but interesting term....'Victory by Archive'
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/saudi- ... h4Wrzpq.01
Sounds like Docs boys in power....war criminals r us