What I read was either/or.
A 1st and Kotkaniemi (dump) for Boeser.
OR
A 1st for Boeser and a prospect.
Rumours...
Moderator: Referees
What I read was either/or.
Or "Wan out of time" as Blob calls it.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:51 pm Sure sounds like the Canucks were somewhat close in making Boeser a Hurricane but not for Dallas taking so long to get their deal done. Ran out of time to negotiate a deal both teams could live with. Canucks did not really want the first, they needed roster player(s) back, particularly a 2nd line centre. Sounds like Carolina was willing to part with a 1st but a roster player would require Canucks giving up a grade A prospect. Not time to negotiate once the Dallas deal was finalized. No wonder Allvin looked so lost. You would think that they would have negated a deal ahead of time???? So they could pull the trigger once the Dallas deal was done. No one wanted Boeser for a roster player. Canucks needed more than a pick to keep the team competitive.
Still say they should have grabbed the first if it was there.
Everything I read was whatever Canucks were getting it involved one of Willander, Lekkermaki or Dpetey.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:58 pmWhat I read was either/or.
A 1st and Kotkaniemi (dump) for Boeser.
OR
A 1st for Boeser and a prospect.
Rumours...
Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:13 pm Everything I read was whatever Canucks were getting it involved one of Willander, Lekkermaki or Dpetey.
Stupid ask.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:15 pmHockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:13 pm Everything I read was whatever Canucks were getting it involved one of Willander, Lekkermaki or Dpetey.![]()
Yeah well fuck that shit.
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Mar 12, 2025 6:47 am I thought Rutherford was brought in to keep Aqualini in check? Given full autonomy? No? Didn’t Francesco give him his blessings to do as he damn well pleases? A true hockey man with copious amounts of experience in running champions organizations?
At the end of the day this falls on management. They are there to advise ownership on the best course of action.