Page 10 of 21

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:30 pm
by Topper
Sprong to the devils

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:31 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Cornuck wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:28 pm On the bright side, none of the prospects were shipped out today.
That's true enough Corn. It's just such a bummer following this team.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:32 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Topper wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:30 pm Sprong to the devils
Hell has sprung.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:35 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
$13.5 in cap space left on the table by the stable geniuses. LOL.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:36 pm
by Carl Yagro
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:32 pm
Topper wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:30 pm Sprong to the devils
Hell has sprung.
No D for the Evils :devil:

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:36 pm
by Meds
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:50 pm Bush league move by Allvin throwing Boeser under the bus to deflect the heat from Aquilini.
How did he throw Brock under the bus?

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:41 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:35 pm $13.5 in cap space left on the table by the stable geniuses. LOL.
I heard it all disappears in the summer. Can''t use it for next year

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:42 pm
by Hockey Widow
Mëds wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:36 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:50 pm Bush league move by Allvin throwing Boeser under the bus to deflect the heat from Aquilini.
How did he throw Brock under the bus?
Said no one was willing to pay the cost for Boeser and they could not get a deal done. Basically telling his agent he couldn’t be moved for a return that Canucks could accept.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:45 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Mëds wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:36 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:50 pm Bush league move by Allvin throwing Boeser under the bus to deflect the heat from Aquilini.
How did he throw Brock under the bus?
Well he said there was no interest in him with him going into UFA. That's he's not worth much. Why say anything?

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:47 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:41 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:35 pm $13.5 in cap space left on the table by the stable geniuses. LOL.
I heard it all disappears in the summer. Can''t use it for next year
Right. Oh well at least the owner saves a few bucks eh. There is that.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:47 pm
by Hockey Widow
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:30 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:24 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:17 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:13 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
Source?
Oh come on Wids. Look at the evidence. It was a seller's market for gawd.s sake. Let's at least be straight with each other, the team bu;llshitting us is bad enough.
Still doesn’t prove they turned down a first. Let’s be honest with each other. Canucks didn’t want picks and prospects. Made it known they wanted roster player(s) so they could still compete.

Neither you nor I know what was on the table. So your guess is as good as mine. But I simply don’t buy that they turned down a 1st or any other good trade. I believe him he got offered less and that that return would inhibit our ability to make the playoffs. This was all about still making the playoffs and they felt they were better suited to do that than take any return they were being offered. This is where it is fucked up. Boston just unloaded a shitload because they can read the tea leaves. So ya, maybe that part is ownership saying playoffs or your job. This is my frustration.

We always seem to fail to move out players when other teams can move on.
Well let's disagree then, I can't believe they weren't offered anything worth trading for. He's a better hockey player than Anthony Beauvillier in my very humble opinion.The rest of your post hits the target square. Ownership wants the two gates.I used to do schtick about this stuff with Frankie, I know the drill :lol:
So let’s say you are the Vancouver Canucks. You are in the mix. You want to add Brock Boeser. Would you be happy the team paid a first and a good prospect or a 1st and a roster player? Maybe Lekkermaki or Hoglander? Is that a deal you would like?

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:49 pm
by Hockey Widow
The GM I like is Sakic. He moves out players before losing them to FA.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:54 pm
by Meds
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:42 pm
Mëds wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:36 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:50 pm Bush league move by Allvin throwing Boeser under the bus to deflect the heat from Aquilini.
How did he throw Brock under the bus?
Said no one was willing to pay the cost for Boeser and they could not get a deal done. Basically telling his agent he couldn’t be moved for a return that Canucks could accept.
Well, we don't know what the offers were. The only comments about Brock that I heard was: "I spoke with his agent last night and told him that this could happen that no deal would be made" and "If I told you what I was offered for Brock Boeser I would have to run out of here because you would not believe me."

You can interpret this a few different ways I suppose.....

1. Boeser has no value and nobody wants him.

2. The Canucks consider Boeser's value to be high and will continue to pursue an extension rather than move him for pennies on the dollar.

3. The Canucks want to keep Brock and so they turned down offers and spun this to try and leverage a lower AAV out of Boeser's camp in extension negotiations.

The best way for the Canucks to have approached this though would have been to say that there were inquires about Brock but that the organization prefers to keep Boeser a Canuck and were only listening in case someone absolutely blew their doors off with an offer that nobody could say no to. That would have been the best way to butter up the player.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:56 pm
by Meds
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:49 pm The GM I like is Sakic. He moves out players before losing them to FA.
It's too bad Sakic isn't a GM. ;)

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 2:01 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:47 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:30 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:24 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:17 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:13 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
Source?
Oh come on Wids. Look at the evidence. It was a seller's market for gawd.s sake. Let's at least be straight with each other, the team bu;llshitting us is bad enough.
Still doesn’t prove they turned down a first. Let’s be honest with each other. Canucks didn’t want picks and prospects. Made it known they wanted roster player(s) so they could still compete.

Neither you nor I know what was on the table. So your guess is as good as mine. But I simply don’t buy that they turned down a 1st or any other good trade. I believe him he got offered less and that that return would inhibit our ability to make the playoffs. This was all about still making the playoffs and they felt they were better suited to do that than take any return they were being offered. This is where it is fucked up. Boston just unloaded a shitload because they can read the tea leaves. So ya, maybe that part is ownership saying playoffs or your job. This is my frustration.

We always seem to fail to move out players when other teams can move on.
Well let's disagree then, I can't believe they weren't offered anything worth trading for. He's a better hockey player than Anthony Beauvillier in my very humble opinion.The rest of your post hits the target square. Ownership wants the two gates.I used to do schtick about this stuff with Frankie, I know the drill :lol:
So let’s say you are the Vancouver Canucks. You are in the mix. You want to add Brock Boeser. Would you be happy the team paid a first and a good prospect or a 1st and a roster player? Maybe Lekkermaki or Hoglander? Is that a deal you would like?
I think he fetches a late first as I said before. The overwhelming consensus is that Allvin is lying and the Cabnucks must have turned down decent offers for Suter and Boeser. But none us were in the war room drinking coffee and eating potato chips with the braintrust as you said so they do have a degree of deniability even if it isn't very plausible.