Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderators: donlever, Referees

User avatar
donlever
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 4549
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by donlever »

Ronning's Ghost wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2025 10:36 pm Or what those who posted as Benning believers would now like to pass off as trolling.
Bingo.
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11416
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Rick the Rumour Mill Dhaliwal on Hughes:

"I did hear last night that the Capitals have interest."

I can actually see this as having some legitimacy.

Capitals top prospects:

1. Leonard - graduated - RW
2. Hutson - College - LS D-man
3. Cristall - minors - LW
4. Protas - minors - C/LW
5. Lakovic - WHL - LW
6. Miroshnichenko - minors - LW
7. Gastrin - Sweden - Centre

You’re not getting Leonard but for prospects Hutson, Lakovic and Gastrin have to be on the table. Not a huge fan of Cristall.
Last edited by Chef Boi RD on Tue Dec 09, 2025 7:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Hey Trump, I’m ANTIFA.
User avatar
Cornuck
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 5242
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Everywhere

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Cornuck »

Chef Boi RD wrote: Tue Dec 09, 2025 7:40 pm Rick the Rumour Mill Dhaliwal on Hughes:

"I did hear last night that EVERY TEAM has interest."

I can actually see this as having some legitimacy.
FFS - I wish I got paid to write that shit - any team would LOVE to have Hughes and would be "interested" to see if they can make it happen.
User avatar
Carl Yagro
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2269
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: On wide shoulders...

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Carl Yagro »

Any team would LOVE to have Hughes... and one of those teams should be the Canucks.

FA should well to consider this and do whatever it takes as the first priority. Ask the Captain for input as what would be the shortest route possible back to anything resembling success to entice him to stay before completely giving up.

First, try muzzling the Raisin from talking all over the grapevine. Or fire both their asses and bring in someone with more contemporary views.

You got two valuable pieces left. The terrestrial is much more important than the ET. Do whatever you can to make the right choice before the choice is made for you.

Just my opinion.
"Look, I'm just a bitter old man, ok! :D"
- Anonymous

Heavy is the Tarp... :cry:
Ronning's Ghost
MVP
MVP
Posts: 610
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 5:25 pm
Location: New Westminster

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Ronning's Ghost »

Carl Yagro wrote: Tue Dec 09, 2025 8:08 pm Any team would LOVE to have Hughes... and one of those teams should be the Canucks.

FA should well to consider this and do whatever it takes as the first priority. Ask the Captain for input as what would be the shortest route possible back to anything resembling success to entice him to stay before completely giving up.
I would be very much in favour of the Canucks taking that step.

Do you think we would hear about it, if they did?
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Meds »

Ronning's Ghost wrote: Tue Dec 09, 2025 11:29 pm
Carl Yagro wrote: Tue Dec 09, 2025 8:08 pm Any team would LOVE to have Hughes... and one of those teams should be the Canucks.

FA should well to consider this and do whatever it takes as the first priority. Ask the Captain for input as what would be the shortest route possible back to anything resembling success to entice him to stay before completely giving up.
I would be very much in favour of the Canucks taking that step.

Do you think we would hear about it, if they did?
At this point, if Rutherford and Allvin are shown the door, roster changes happen, and Hughes stays in Vancouver, then I think it's safe to assume that they did.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 7044
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

Only Mr Aquilini could oversee the series of management blunders we have all witnessed and still allow the same people who created this great big mess to trade the greatest player in franchise history at age 26 as a direct consequence of having made the mess in the first place.

That's my feeling.
el rey del mambo
User avatar
JelloPuddingPop
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:53 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by JelloPuddingPop »

Megaterio Llamas wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 5:30 am Only Mr Aquilini could oversee the series of management blunders we have all witnessed and still allow the same people who created this great big mess to trade the greatest player in franchise history at age 26 as a direct consequence of having made the mess in the first place.

That's my feeling.
I would be surprised if anyone disagrees with this Megs. It all starts at the top - and the mismanagement we've seen over the last few decades has been nothing short of shocking.

FA must have gotten used to doing business in Vancouver, as real-estate has been such a boon, and seems to be immune to rise/fall cycles in that particular city (until now, which is even more concerning for the Canucks). He could be businessman at the level of Trump University, or Trump Airlines - and his real estate would still prop those up. He doesn't need to know anything about running a business - real estate and YOUR Vancouver Canucks will keep him rolling in it until the cows come home.
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11416
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Chef Boi RD »

I’m pretty much resided with the fact that as long as the Aqualini’s are the owners it will be a Mickey Mouse club until such a time they sell. Shoulda seen the writing on the wall when they demanded Nonis to get rid of young prospects in Kesler and Bieksa and a first round puck for a fading out veteran (Brad Richards I believe) and Nonis said no - “your fired!”. The pattern hasn’t changed.
Hey Trump, I’m ANTIFA.
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8713
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

I find enjoying a series of well spun fatties really knocks the angst away from caring about Canucks bullshit over the past half century or so
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Dangling one
AHL Prospect
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2023 4:43 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Dangling one »

Cousin Strawberry wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 8:50 am I find enjoying a series of well spun fatties really knocks the angst away from caring about Canucks bullshit over the past half century or so
+1
Kenji
MVP
MVP
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:20 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Kenji »

Re new posters - sometimes I feel like I’m stepping into a bar in a new place in the middle of an argument that’s been going on for a long time and I just take my beer to the back. But it’s colourful!

Re QH - assuming he hasn’t given ownership the warning that he won’t resign, I think there’s a path back to elite team status without a total rebuild. They’re terrible now and that’s with some high priced players. What this shows is that hockey is a weak link sport and the centres are obviously mediocre. If you can’t trade for them, you have to grow you own. Cootes is in the system. Did we think he has 2/3 potential? I think he did. If we get one more legit pivot then with Raty at 3/4 and the ambulatory husk of Alien we would have legit depth at the position.


That’s how I’d try to sell it to QH.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Meds »

Cousin Strawberry wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 8:50 am I find enjoying a series of well spun fatties really knocks the angst away from caring about Canucks bullshit over the past half century or so
Now, when you say a series of fatties.....
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 11416
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Kenji wrote: Wed Dec 10, 2025 11:48 am Re new posters - sometimes I feel like I’m stepping into a bar in a new place in the middle of an argument that’s been going on for a long time and I just take my beer to the back. But it’s colourful!

Re QH - assuming he hasn’t given ownership the warning that he won’t resign, I think there’s a path back to elite team status without a total rebuild. They’re terrible now and that’s with some high priced players. What this shows is that hockey is a weak link sport and the centres are obviously mediocre. If you can’t trade for them, you have to grow you own. Cootes is in the system. Did we think he has 2/3 potential? I think he did. If we get one more legit pivot then with Raty at 3/4 and the ambulatory husk of Alien we would have legit depth at the position.


That’s how I’d try to sell it to QH.
A bit early to tell but I don’t see Cootes as a 1C, maybe tops out as a tier 2 - 1C or plain ole 2C.

I think everyone needs to treat the returns on Hughes with a focus on getting the best player available then go from there for the rest of the package, value out from there.

My worry is is we are (management) focused too much on getting “a centre” first and foremost in which could vary well end up downgrading the value of the “best part” of the returning package. Fuck positional need, just get the best quality asset regardless of position, for instance if it’s Detroit I’m saying to them “we start with Evidsson” and go from there. You don’t start low with, for instance - centres (positional need) like Kasper or Danielson because pound for pound - Evidsson holds much much more value.

We really need to stop focusing on quantity over quality, it’s watering down the product. After you agree on Edvinsson you then shoot for Carter Bear because IMO - Bear has a higher ceiling than Kasper and Danielson. Then if they agree on Edvinsson and Bear you try to snag one of those two centres and a first round pick. You start with the best possible asset, aim for it regardless of position.
Hey Trump, I’m ANTIFA.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Re-booted SKYO approved pipe dreams and trade ideas

Post by Meds »

Agreed Chef. Trades that send out a franchise player should be treated like 1st round draft picks.....best player available. When you make trades like that based upon positional need, you simply cannot progress properly and you will come away the loser if a better player was available but you took lesser to fill a hole in the shitty job you did of constructing the team.

The other thing to remember is that trading Hughes means rebuild. It doesn't mean re-tool unless you are getting a 1C AND a dman as good as Hronek back in the package.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
Post Reply