Hmmmmm..... and which regiment would that be?BigTuna wrote: Incorrect. The leaves aren't named after "Leaves", they're named after a specific army unit. Therefore it's "leaves".
"After taking control on Valentine's Day 1927, Smythe immediately renamed the team the Maple leaves. The Maple leaves say that the name was chosen in honour of the Maple Leaf Regiment from World War I;"
Everyone saying "Leaves" is wrong. You don't use plural form on a specific group name.
In WWI, the Canadian regiments in the BEF were numbered - their regimental names either being used before or after the Great War. Even so, no 'Maple Leaf Regiment' or even 'The Maple Leaf Regiment' (ie-like The Ontario Regiment or le Régiment de Hull) comes to mind either from the militia or regular force rolls. Even a colloquial nickname like 'The Maple leaves' seems a tad week-old fishy to me
Pull something official out of the Directorate of History and Heritage or the War Museum as proof and I might buy it and stand corrected, but this sounds like typical revisionist history fabrication to back up the myopic, 'Centre-of-the Universe & We-are-Canada' tripe of a blasphemous mythology that spews out of that festering cesspool.
I Like Doc's version - Maple Leavings, indeed.

