Page 471 of 472
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2026 1:55 pm
by donlever
Yeah...I commented here a couple of weeks back that it is not beyond the realm of possibilities that our guys could be the top 2 centre's on that team this year.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2026 2:49 pm
by dangler
BoS wrote: ↑Thu Jul 16, 2026 7:11 pm
I think it’s a fine list.
Toss in Zeev, and you’ve got a broad young nucleus to build a core.
If RJ could pull a dart er-diamond or two out of the later rounds…
Let's give Todd Harvey & staff credit where/if credit is due.
Even Rutherford said a couple of the later round picks need to hit for the rebuild to progress at a decent rate.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2026 7:04 am
by Lancer
You think about it, that 2011 squad had a number of players picked past the first round - or not at all - playing significant parts on the team. Bieksa, Hansen, Raymond, Edler and Burrows make you realize how good/lucky the organization was in hitting on bets past the first round. It would be nice to see a D-Petey and/or Rogowski develop into those roles in a contender.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2026 10:05 am
by donlever
Hopefully one (or two) of those late hits are represented by Lucian Bernat and/or Connor Davis because our show level RW depth currently:
Boeser Karlsson Sushi
...is pretty weak.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2026 12:05 pm
by dangler
donlever wrote: ↑Sun Jul 26, 2026 10:05 am
Hopefully one (or two) of those late hits are represented by Lucian Bernat and/or Connor Davis because our show level RW depth currently:
Boeser Karlsson Sushi
...is pretty weak.
Really hoping sushi can come to camp healthy, in shape & ready to go. His development has been a little behind due to injury and illness so this should be a very important season for him to show he's got the goods to be a everyday NHLer.
Karlsson should continue the improvement he began to show last season.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2026 12:44 pm
by donlever
Yeah agree on Lekk, fingers crossed, we shall see, he can shoot the hell out of the puck for sure, we need to see if his size hampers him against NHL D men full time...also whether his shoulder is now an afterthought or a career issue...
....Karlsson is 27 in November though....he will reach peak growth not incredibly far beyond what we see/can surmise as developmental limits I imagine, especially when considering his skating as it applies to the current day game.
This does not mean he is not a serviceable player.
Just limited, which when reviewing our RW depth is not a great characteristic.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2026 9:28 am
by UWSaint
I am skeptical on Sushi because I don't love the profile of the player (slender, shooting top attribute, lacking grit). But operating within that profile (which is a tough one to get NHL success from but when it happens, its a hard-to-find-elsewhere player), I don't think he should be written off because of last season. He's had AHL success despite the development interruptions. And there's a good chance these are interruptions, not a sign there's no more development to be had. The real issue for me is what it has always been -- there's a load of guys who can be top line AHL players who can't make a dent in the NHL because skills don't scale linearly.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2026 11:01 am
by 5thhorseman
I agree on Sushi. That slight build is too Mason Raymond and even if he's a success he may disappear when it matters most. That said, in the NHL games I've seen he has shown a lot of poise, holding on to the puck and making the right play rather than dumping the puck or putting a teammate in a bad position. Best case may be we sell high on him. Hope RJ has the balls and smarts to make such moves.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2026 4:55 pm
by donlever
Rogowski 2 goals in 2 games....
He is #18.
The first he shows decent enough wheels for a big dude.
The second it is his takeaway and pretty slick pass that sets up the scoring chance but rather than admire his work he out hustles 2 defenders, heads to the net and pots the rebound.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbT9ieRA ... 83czVxdXVs
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 11:46 am
by Aaronp18
Positive signs for our draft pick!
I strongly feel once we have a solid #18 that stays in the lineup and contributes as much or longer than Larionov could it'll get us over the Cup hump.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 11:48 am
by donlever
Aaronp18 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2026 11:46 am
I strongly feel once we have a solid #18 that stays in the lineup and contributes as much or longer than Larionov could it'll get us over the Cup hump.
Ha!
Now there's something to grasp onto I had never thought of....
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 3:11 pm
by Carl Yagro
Aaronp18 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2026 11:46 am
I strongly feel once we have a solid #18 that stays in the lineup and contributes as much or longer...
Sorry AP17, but I don't feel like hanging around and contributing as much here these days... but I think I'm still pretty solid.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 6:19 pm
by Aaronp18
Has nothing to do with how I feel! Haha
One day again I will have the time and ability. Actually once golf season is over should be here more often.

Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 7:02 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
donlever wrote: ↑Mon Jul 27, 2026 4:55 pm
Rogowski 2 goals in 2 games....
He is #18.
The first he shows decent enough wheels for a big dude.
The second it is his takeaway and pretty slick pass that sets up the scoring chance but rather than admire his work he out hustles 2 defenders, heads to the net and pots the rebound.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbT9ieRA ... 83czVxdXVs
That is pretty darn imnpressive. I completely forgot about this mini tournament.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 7:28 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
Why Canucks’ Anthony Romani is a late-blooming prospect to watch
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/745841 ... gan-state/
Let me know if the link works for non subscribers (recently this was supposedly changed). I'll quote the text from the article here if not.
It's kind of a nothing write up from Scott Wheeler, but I thought what the heck.