CanucksCorner.com Forums

SKYO wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:58 pm

4th period, Sept 25, 2018:

Ottawa tried to trade Zack Smith last season and this summer. He’s now on waivers with 3-years left on his deal. Bit of a surprise, frankly.

$3.25M x 2 left on deal, no bonuses, 10 team no trade to clause.

Eriksson for Smith straight up.

rikster wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2019 7:37 am Dude, it doesn’t matter where your wife gets her appetite, it’s where she gets fed that counts so I wouldn’t stress too much over some stray hairs...

Sekeres:

My understanding is Loui Eriksson's family is moving out of Vancouver and back to Dallas, further indication that Eriksson doesn't anticipate playing for the #Canucks next season and expects a trade.

I’m still keeping an eye on the Stars as a potential destination for Loui Eriksson.

Could see something involving Cogliano who has 2 years at $3.25M per left and/or Comeau who also has 2 years remaining at $2.4M per

Uncle dans leg wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 11:05 am Is it true that eriksson didnt waive to go to edmonton?

Apparently the rumour says they would've sent lucic and pull-your-rv for loser looey...

August 8, 2017 via pro hockey rumours:

Over the last three seasons in particular, we’ve seen a number of so-called “mutual terminations”. In fact, we’ve seen more mutual terminations over this period than buyouts. They are just as they sound – when a player and team decide their prior arrangement is no longer agreeable, the teams cut ties entirely. The benefit for the team is that the cap hit of the player is cancelled out entirely.

The benefit for the player is that they then have the opportunity to seek employment with a different franchise or a different league.

SKYO wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:42 pm

August 8, 2017 via pro hockey rumours:

Over the last three seasons in particular, we’ve seen a number of so-called “mutual terminations”. In fact, we’ve seen more mutual terminations over this period than buyouts. They are just as they sound – when a player and team decide their prior arrangement is no longer agreeable, the teams cut ties entirely. The benefit for the team is that the cap hit of the player is cancelled out entirely.

The benefit for the player is that they then have the opportunity to seek employment with a different franchise or a different league.

Seems like the way to go is put said player on waivers, he clears waivers, they refuse to go to the farm team, then the team and player agree on a mutual termination of contract.

If the Canucks and Loui Eriksson agree to mutually terminate his contract, he can sign with the Stars for cheap like $1.5M per and he and his family can reside happily in Dallas where they all feel comfortable and more importantly his wife is happy.

Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:33 pm

SKYO wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:42 pm

August 8, 2017 via pro hockey rumours:

Over the last three seasons in particular, we’ve seen a number of so-called “mutual terminations”. In fact, we’ve seen more mutual terminations over this period than buyouts. They are just as they sound – when a player and team decide their prior arrangement is no longer agreeable, the teams cut ties entirely. The benefit for the team is that the cap hit of the player is cancelled out entirely.

The benefit for the player is that they then have the opportunity to seek employment with a different franchise or a different league.

Seems like the way to go is put said player on waivers, he clears waivers, they refuse to go to the farm team, then the team and player agree on a mutual termination of contract.

If the Canucks and Loui Eriksson agree to mutually terminate his contract, he can sign with the Stars for cheap like $1.5M per and he and his family can reside happily in Dallas where they all feel comfortable and more importantly his wife is happy.

Especially now that his bonus is paid. He’s only owed 3M per. If there is a mutual termination he can sign on for anything less than 3 on a 1-2 year deal. I don’t know what happens to his bonus, let him keep it if it helps us get rid of him. Don’t know if that means we have a 4M cap hit this year but if so it’s worth it. I like this idea.

Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:33 pm

SKYO wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:42 pm

August 8, 2017 via pro hockey rumours:

Over the last three seasons in particular, we’ve seen a number of so-called “mutual terminations”. In fact, we’ve seen more mutual terminations over this period than buyouts. They are just as they sound – when a player and team decide their prior arrangement is no longer agreeable, the teams cut ties entirely. The benefit for the team is that the cap hit of the player is cancelled out entirely.

The benefit for the player is that they then have the opportunity to seek employment with a different franchise or a different league.

Seems like the way to go is put said player on waivers, he clears waivers, they refuse to go to the farm team, then the team and player agree on a mutual termination of contract.

If the Canucks and Loui Eriksson agree to mutually terminate his contract, he can sign with the Stars for cheap like $1.5M per and he and his family can reside happily in Dallas where they all feel comfortable and more importantly his wife is happy.

Especially now that his bonus is paid. He’s only owed 3M per. If there is a mutual termination he can sign on for anything less than 3 on a 1-2 year deal. I don’t know what happens to his bonus, let him keep it if it helps us get rid of him. Don’t know if that means we have a 4M cap hit this year but if so it’s worth it. I like this idea.

Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:33 pm

SKYO wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2019 3:42 pm

August 8, 2017 via pro hockey rumours:

Over the last three seasons in particular, we’ve seen a number of so-called “mutual terminations”. In fact, we’ve seen more mutual terminations over this period than buyouts. They are just as they sound – when a player and team decide their prior arrangement is no longer agreeable, the teams cut ties entirely. The benefit for the team is that the cap hit of the player is cancelled out entirely.

The benefit for the player is that they then have the opportunity to seek employment with a different franchise or a different league.

Seems like the way to go is put said player on waivers, he clears waivers, they refuse to go to the farm team, then the team and player agree on a mutual termination of contract.

If the Canucks and Loui Eriksson agree to mutually terminate his contract, he can sign with the Stars for cheap like $1.5M per and he and his family can reside happily in Dallas where they all feel comfortable and more importantly his wife is happy.

Especially now that his bonus is paid. He’s only owed 3M per. If there is a mutual termination he can sign on for anything less than 3 on a 1-2 year deal. I don’t know what happens to his bonus, let him keep it if it helps us get rid of him. Don’t know if that means we have a 4M cap hit this year but if so it’s worth it. I like this idea.

Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2019 7:19 am

SKYO wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:58 pm

4th period, Sept 25, 2018:

Ottawa tried to trade Zack Smith last season and this summer. He’s now on waivers with 3-years left on his deal. Bit of a surprise, frankly.

$3.25M x 2 left on deal, no bonuses, 10 team no trade to clause.

Eriksson for Smith straight up.

SOLD!!

SKYO wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:23 pm

Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2019 7:19 am

SKYO wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:58 pm

4th period, Sept 25, 2018:

Ottawa tried to trade Zack Smith last season and this summer. He’s now on waivers with 3-years left on his deal. Bit of a surprise, frankly.

$3.25M x 2 left on deal, no bonuses, 10 team no trade to clause.

Eriksson for Smith straight up.

SOLD!!

dang, Hawks traded Anisimov for Smith.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/b ... story.html

Hawks get $1.3M in cap space in the deal. *& the Sens save $1.5M actual dollars - proof Eugene Melnyk want's to save cash.