CanucksCorner.com Forums

BladesofSteel wrote:

BigTuna wrote: And BTW, Phil Kessel is 26 and hasn't missed a game in years.

Didn't he miss the last two months of '14?

His production was fine,

Strangelove wrote:

BigTuna wrote:Lieweke would have never even considered Vancouver.

Who knows and who cares.

What we... do know... is that he's now kicking himself for ever considering Toronto.

And... that's... really fucking funny!!

He signed a 5 year deal last summer!

Elliott Friedman today claimed it was the leaves who kicked Liewke to the curve.

BigTuna wrote: Elliott Friedman today claimed it was the leaves who kicked Liewke to the curve.

Actually Friedman says that MLSE confronted Leiweke about his rumoured plans to abandon ship.

Leiweke responded it's true and he could only commit to them until June 30, 2015.

MLSE: "What?? You're dumping us?? Go tell the world what a bitch you are!! sob"

http://www.cbc.ca/sports-content/hockey ... -mlse.html

Strangelove wrote:

BigTuna wrote: Elliott Friedman today claimed it was the leaves who kicked Liewke to the curve.

Actually Friedman says that MLSE confronted Leiweke about his rumoured plans to abandon ship.

Leiweke responded it's true and he could only commit to them until June 30, 2015.

MLSE: "What?? You're dumping us?? Go tell the world what a bitch you are!! sob"

http://www.cbc.ca/sports-content/hockey ... -mlse.html

They asked him to commit longer and he wouldn't. I'm not sure why him having a shot at bringing an NFL team to LA is a shot at the leaves.

Leiweke, like myself, has bigger fish to fry.

Plenty of two headed hydra Bell/Rogers migraine stories emerging.

I await Shanahan's video review of the incident.

Topper wrote:Leiweke, like myself, has bigger fish to fry.

Plenty of two headed hydra Bell/Rogers migraine stories emerging.

I await Shanahan's video review of the incident.

Topper, sometimes you are, well, just downright funny!!

BigTuna wrote:

Strangelove wrote:

BigTuna wrote: Elliott Friedman today claimed it was the leaves who kicked Liewke to the curve.

Actually Friedman says that MLSE confronted Leiweke about his rumoured plans to abandon ship.

Leiweke responded it's true and he could only commit to them until June 30, 2015.

MLSE: "What?? You're dumping us?? Go tell the world what a bitch you are!! sob"

http://www.cbc.ca/sports-content/hockey ... -mlse.html

They asked him to commit longer and he wouldn't. I'm not sure why him having a shot at bringing an NFL team to LA is a shot at the leaves.

Ummm so we're not talking about the Friedman article anymore?

Listen Fishbreathe, it's side-splittingly funny that Leiweke is dumping MLSE

.... no matter what you Leafers tell yourselves!

I say Leiweke realized all the teams in Moronto are going to suck forever (especially the Leaves)

... and he didn't want to be the fall guy for dat dere.

BigTuna wrote:

Tciso wrote:I can see them moving teams, but not adding new teams. But, Bettman might want a 2nd team in Toronto that beats the Leaves as his legacy. He is a madman.

Incorrect spelling. It's leaves. "Leaves" is not correct.

Like the Kansas City Cheaves.

Leaf, singular, Leaves, plural.

Start at the 20 min mark, probably the only time Suzuki has said anything sensible.

Topper wrote:

BigTuna wrote:

Tciso wrote:I can see them moving teams, but not adding new teams. But, Bettman might want a 2nd team in Toronto that beats the Leaves as his legacy. He is a madman.

Incorrect spelling. It's leaves. "Leaves" is not correct.

Like the Kansas City Cheaves.

Leaf, singular, Leaves, plural.

Start at the 20 min mark, probably the only time Suzuki has said anything sensible.

Unlike the many different kinds of fishes in the sea, there is only one kind of maple leaf.

Leaf the spelling of leaves to us please...

Topper wrote:

BigTuna wrote:

Tciso wrote:I can see them moving teams, but not adding new teams. But, Bettman might want a 2nd team in Toronto that beats the Leaves as his legacy. He is a madman.

Incorrect spelling. It's leaves. "Leaves" is not correct.

Like the Kansas City Cheaves.

Leaf, singular, Leaves, plural.

Start at the 20 min mark, probably the only time Suzuki has said anything sensible.

Incorrect. The leaves aren't named after "Leaves", they're named after a specific army unit. Therefore it's "leaves".

"After taking control on Valentine's Day 1927, Smythe immediately renamed the team the Maple leaves. The Maple leaves say that the name was chosen in honour of the Maple Leaf Regiment from World War I;"

Everyone saying "Leaves" is wrong. You don't use plural form on a specific group name.

rats19 wrote:Leaf the spelling of leaves to us please...

I will let you guys write the wrong information as usual.

just thought I'd de-lurk to..

lofl

..oh the ironyeaves

Leves.......

Leves decloaks while everyone and their dawg are reliefing themselfs on Tuna.

BigTuna wrote: Everyone saying "Leaves" is wrong.

Well one man's "wrong" is another man's RIGHT FUCKING ON!!!

Oxford and Webster follow our lead in these matters.

We at the Corner were the first to coin "nawsome" and "thingydo" and... LOOK AT THEM NOW!!!


BLOW LEAVES BLOW!

BLOW LEAVES BLOW!!

BLOW LEAVES BLOW!!!