CanucksCorner.com Forums

Does the US Ambassador's comments and retweet of Trump's 51st State ramblings constitute a threat to Canadian sovereignty that Canada should kick the Ambassador out for? Or at least call him in for a stern warning.

Anyone in Ottawa have the balls for it?

Maybe the CBC (or Ford) can discuss invoking article 5. That'll get elbows back up.

Parliamentary Budget Office is predicting an additional $23 billion dollar on the deficit than Carney stated a a month ago.

The $25 billion dollar sovereign wealth fund is set to cost $750 million a year in interest charges to pay for the borrowing to seed the fund.

Topper wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2026 1:18 pm The $25 billion dollar sovereign wealth fund is set to cost $750 million a year in interest charges to pay for the borrowing to seed the fund.

Not really surprising considering the guys who made this decision and the voters who elected them.

In a typically authoritarian way of tackling affordability, The Liberal Government is handing out tax rebate cheques to low income families. Money they had to give the government last year.

In a show of unity for the downtrodden, Carney has spent nearly $200,000 on inflight catering for three overseas trips this year.

Then to advertise and celebrate his first tax rebate installment to the downtrodden, he and his wife flew on their government jet from Ottawa to Toronto for a photo op at a Brampton Ontario grocery store. He appeared in a tailored suit, she in her doughtiest Channel.

Both had deer in headlights looks of being in a grocery store for the first time.

Not to be out done, at a Parliamentary Committee meeting, a Conservative MP asked the Governments Chief Science Officer to define what a woman is.

Before she could answer, Liberal MP's called two Points of Order, that such a question and answer would be insensitive during Pride Month.

The Chairman finally allowed the Science Officer to answer the question as long as she was respectful to diversity.

She, having a PhD in molecular biology, answered that within the animal kingdom, females are identified as individuals with two X chromosomes.

Topper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2026 10:58 am
a Conservative MP asked the Governments Chief Science Officer to define what a woman is.

Before she could answer, Liberal MP's called two Points of Order, that such a question and answer would be insensitive during Pride Month.

The Chairman finally allowed the Science Officer to answer the question as long as she was respectful to diversity.

She, having a PhD in molecular biology, answered that within the animal kingdom, females are identified as individuals with two X chromosomes.

Did she have an opportunity to define the other 71 genders?

Tciso wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 12:18 pm

Topper wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2026 10:58 am
a Conservative MP asked the Governments Chief Science Officer to define what a woman is.

Before she could answer, Liberal MP's called two Points of Order, that such a question and answer would be insensitive during Pride Month.

The Chairman finally allowed the Science Officer to answer the question as long as she was respectful to diversity.

She, having a PhD in molecular biology, answered that within the animal kingdom, females are identified as individuals with two X chromosomes.

Did she have an opportunity to define the other 71 genders?

I thought it was 73?

No no you're both fucking it up....

It's 72 virgins

I think you're on to something there Cuz. Can transgenders lose their virginity? I mean if it's not dick in pussy ...

Mëds was promised a Siamese twin virgin 3000 years ago... technically it's still 72.

Would doing conjoined twins count as a 3some?

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 8:57 pm Would doing conjoined twins count as a 3some?

Probably more of a two-and-a-half-some.

Mëds wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 9:03 pm

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 8:57 pm Would doing conjoined twins count as a 3some?

Probably more of a two-and-a-half-some.

I understand they split the feeling down the middle of the body so one half of the baloney sandwich is felt by one side and the other side...the other

That's pretty well a 3some

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 9:06 pm

Mëds wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 9:03 pm

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 8:57 pm Would doing conjoined twins count as a 3some?

Probably more of a two-and-a-half-some.

I understand they split the feeling down the middle of the body so one half of the baloney sandwich is felt by one side and the other side...the other

That's pretty well a 3some

Yeah, but you're still only throwing it in on gash.....

I can tell Cuz is really intrigued to try some fat (duh, of course) conjoined twin action.

He can experience a double blow, but only have to cough up a single fare to send them home on the bus.