I wonder if there's a way to log reporters' rumours, to see who turned out to be right and who was full of shit.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 1:04 pmWell Jim, it comes from Bag Licking, shit stirring, reporters who like to feed rumour mongering, ungrateful, arrogant, cock eating (by the bag full, not one at a time) untalented 'reporters' like JD Burke.SKYO wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 1:00 pm Benning says NOPE, on discussions on trading Boeser.
"I have no intention of trading Brock Boeser. I haven't had one conversation about that, so I don't know where this stuff comes from." - Benning“That’s not true,” Jim Benning on reports that the #Canucks have explored options for trading Brock Boeser.
Says he’s had “zero conversations” with teams about a Boeser deal.
I don't even know where Jimothy Dimothy Burke writes/posts, so I don't see any of his rumours, but this should be a big egg-on-face for Sekeres.
I know others at HFBoards like to think Jimothy Dimothy and Sekeres are gospel, but my impression of Sekeres has always been that he has no inside connections (I mean, what hockey insider would want to talk to that guy?). As I recall, Sekeres' stupid introduction to the market was his article saying "Canucks and Sedins are $100 million apart" or something dumb like that. Based on no insider info, just trying to make a headline.
From that moment on, I've had no time for Sekeres.