Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:26 pm
There was nothing wrong with the Sundin move. Totally agree Wids. If he would have signed July 1 and played the whole year he would have been a force. Bitching about Sundin is asinine especially since he has been gone for ten years
Blob still defending the Players Agent after all these years.
The Sundin experiment was pointless. I just love talking about Money Pucks original offer to him. It’s a doozy. One Leg Sundin 37 years of age.
“Hey Matt! Don’t retire yet you old man, you can sneak some big Ka-Ching out Vancouver before ya hang em up! Just show up, smile and wave, sign jerseys, hit the restaurants! Enjoy!” - Mark Messier
Is your favorite movie Groundhog Day?
So you agree he is replaying the same thing every post and his real name is Ned?
Who knew?
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:37 pm
by Strangelove
Reefer2 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:30 pm
So you agree he is replaying the same thing every post and his real name is Ned?
Who knew?
Dude is Phil Connors.
You're Ned.
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2019 12:47 pm
by Mickey107
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:26 pm
There was nothing wrong with the Sundin move. Totally agree Wids. If he would have signed July 1 and played the whole year he would have been a force. Bitching about Sundin is asinine especially since he has been gone for ten years
Blob still defending the Players Agent after all these years.
The Sundin experiment was pointless. I just love talking about Money Pucks original offer to him. It’s a doozy. One Leg Sundin 37 years of age.
“Hey Matt! Don’t retire yet you old man, you can sneak some big Ka-Ching out Vancouver before ya hang em up! Just show up, smile and wave, sign jerseys, hit the restaurants! Enjoy!” - Mark Messier
Is your favorite movie Groundhog Day?
no
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 10:55 am
But I’d seriously consider trading our first this year or next year as part of a package for an established minute munching top 4 right shot dman.
Next years 1st shouldn’t be on the table period. This will be another lottery pick and it’s a better draft than this year.
Let’s all keep in mind that Swamp Ass said the Canucks were gonna be the runaway favourites for Jack Hughes at the 2019 Draft in our first season without the Twins. There were 9 teams closer to Jack Hughes than the Canucks when the season ended
In other words when Blob makes a prediction. Ignore, it’s his anger speaking
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 10:55 am
But I’d seriously consider trading our first this year or next year as part of a package for an established minute munching top 4 right shot dman.
Next years 1st shouldn’t be on the table period. This will be another lottery pick and it’s a better draft than this year.
Let’s all keep in mind that Swamp Ass said the Canucks were gonna be the runaway favourites for Jack Hughes at the 2019 Draft in our first season without the Twins. There were 9 teams closer to Jack Hughes than the Canucks when the season ended
In other words when Blob makes a prediction. Ignore, it’s his anger speaking
Cool story. Now go back to hanging drywall
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 10:55 am
But I’d seriously consider trading our first this year or next year as part of a package for an established minute munching top 4 right shot dman.
It would have to a younger guy. I’d only trade the 10th this year for the right player but I honestly don’t see him out there and available. Next years 1st shouldn’t be on the table period. This will be another lottery pick and it’s a better draft than this year.
Seeing as the draft is in Vancouver though and Iggy isn’t the most popular guy here ATM, I can’t see him dealing this years 1st
I sincerely doubt he moves this year's pick as well.
No problem trading next year's pick though, you could lottery protect it.
(although I'm sure this team makes the playoffs)
I wouldn't trade for a defenceman requiring expansion draft protection at this point.
Clearly I was talking about the 2020 pick, what the fuck is wrong with you Blob...
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 4:37 pm
by Blob Mckenzie
2020 is next years pick
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 4:41 pm
by Strangelove
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 4:37 pm
2020 is next years pick
Oops, okay, sorry.
Yes, I would be fine with trading the 2020 pick, lottery protected as I said...
(I got confused, I thought you were saying I was willing to trade the 2019 pick)
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 4:37 pm
2020 is next years pick
Oops, okay.
Yes, I would be fine with trading the 2020 pick, lottery protected...
So how would that work? If it’s in the top 15 it ends up being the 2021 pick? I’m just not sure there’s a young d man out there other than Trouba and he would have to be signed to an extension to make it worth it.
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 4:37 pm
2020 is next years pick
Oops, okay.
Yes, I would be fine with trading the 2020 pick, lottery protected...
Blob should be fine with it too. He was OK with his team trading a lottery pick (not protected) and two 2nd round picks for Stud Hamonic
I was? I said it was a steep price. I guess that means I liked it? If you’re going to lie at least be creative. Anyone can go through the archives to see that you are full of shit.
Re: The Bubbles and Dud review every GM move thread
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 4:37 pm
2020 is next years pick
Oops, okay.
Yes, I would be fine with trading the 2020 pick, lottery protected...
So how would that work? If it’s in the top 15 it ends up being the 2021 pick? I’m just not sure there’s a young d man out there other than Trouba and he would have to be signed to an extension to make it worth it.
Wasn't Dickie talking about trading the 2020 1st for a top young dman?
