What would you consider to be a proportionate response?5thhorseman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2026 10:40 amNot disagreeing that they are a state sponsor of terrorism, but it's an incredibly disproportionate response. And thus self-defeating. Overall a massive backwards step.Tciso wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2026 9:01 amUm, seriously? Iran has been exporting jihad to the USA and the world since 1978. They have never stopped provoking. I guess we see geo politics differently, 5th.5thhorseman wrote: ↑Wed Nov 04, 2026 1:20 pm I'd hate to be the Democrats, especially in 2 years if they gain the presidency. They always seem to get the shit end of the stick to clean up the Republicans' mess. If we're being fair, they owe Iran a ton of reparations for their unprovoked attack.
US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Moderators: donlever, Referees
- Meds
- MVP

- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Lose The Right Way
- Tciso
- MVP

- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Bomb the jihad out of them. That's how we changed the mindset of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.
While the average person in Western society might not believe we are at war with them, their Theocracy is at war with us. They have been all along.
While the average person in Western society might not believe we are at war with them, their Theocracy is at war with us. They have been all along.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
- Meds
- MVP

- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
I know what you would consider a proportional response. I want to know what 5th thinks.
Lose The Right Way
- 5thhorseman
- MVP

- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Wow, you guys actually think bombing the fuck out of Iran is going to make the IRGC lose control. Just up Trump's 10,000 targets to 20,000. No! 30,000! Insane!
- Cousin Strawberry
- MVP

- Posts: 10144
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
- Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Bombing fanatics only creates more fanatics. Just ask the Jews
If you need air...call it in
- Tciso
- MVP

- Posts: 1851
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
- Meds
- MVP

- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Who is the "you guys"?5thhorseman wrote: ↑Thu Nov 05, 2026 4:40 pm Wow, you guys actually think bombing the fuck out of Iran is going to make the IRGC lose control. Just up Trump's 10,000 targets to 20,000. No! 30,000! Insane!
So far just Tciso has said that. I just wanted to hear what you thought should happen, not just criticism of what did happen.
Lose The Right Way
- 5thhorseman
- MVP

- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
There's no solutions Mëds. Trump has painted the US into a corner.
- Meds
- MVP

- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
Apologies, that wasn't clear.5thhorseman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2026 12:11 pm There's no solutions Mëds. Trump has painted the US into a corner.
What do you think SHOULD HAVE happened. If the response was disproportionate, what would have been proportionate?
Lose The Right Way
- 5thhorseman
- MVP

- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
It's not about having the right level of military response. A proportionate response isn't the solution, but at least it's just another in a long line of tit for tat and isn't going to close off diplomacy as an option. For example the killing of Soleimani probably falls within that circle of proportionality, though it probably tested the limits.
Ideally they should have returned to the JCPOA, or something similar, along with sanctions, banking restrictions, etc. It's not a perfect solution and Iran may have ended up with a nuke in 5, 10, 20 years anyways, but it's a "keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" approach that may have led to other options or possibly delay things long enough for regime change to take place organically.
It would be nearly impossible to invade Iran and force regime change. It's too mountainous and would be another Afghanistan.
Ideally they should have returned to the JCPOA, or something similar, along with sanctions, banking restrictions, etc. It's not a perfect solution and Iran may have ended up with a nuke in 5, 10, 20 years anyways, but it's a "keep your friends close, and your enemies closer" approach that may have led to other options or possibly delay things long enough for regime change to take place organically.
It would be nearly impossible to invade Iran and force regime change. It's too mountainous and would be another Afghanistan.
- Meds
- MVP

- Posts: 6443
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
So push the problem down the road for the next generation to deal with?
You have a theocracy where the guys in charge believe they get an eternal reward that is proportional to the number of infidels that they send to the afterlife. Under what circumstances is it OK to allow them to exist if they are brazenly pursuing the means of producing their own WMD?
If Iran actually obtained nuclear weapons, there is not a threat in the universe that someone could make that would keep them from using it. The only responses at that point would be conciliatory.
Some like to point out that Russia and China (the big bad evils) also possess nuclear arms and that they haven't used them.....but those folks often fail to recognize that the only thing preventing that is mutually assured destruction. The jihadist theocracy does not fear that at all, in fact, the true believer welcomes it.
You have a theocracy where the guys in charge believe they get an eternal reward that is proportional to the number of infidels that they send to the afterlife. Under what circumstances is it OK to allow them to exist if they are brazenly pursuing the means of producing their own WMD?
If Iran actually obtained nuclear weapons, there is not a threat in the universe that someone could make that would keep them from using it. The only responses at that point would be conciliatory.
Some like to point out that Russia and China (the big bad evils) also possess nuclear arms and that they haven't used them.....but those folks often fail to recognize that the only thing preventing that is mutually assured destruction. The jihadist theocracy does not fear that at all, in fact, the true believer welcomes it.
Lose The Right Way
- 5thhorseman
- MVP

- Posts: 2684
- Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am
Re: US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond
If there's a reward scale and the Iranian theocracy is trying to maximise their virgin count using WMDs, then yeah, we need to fuck those people up.
If they're just regular martyr-obsessed freakos then I don't believe they are actually motivated to die for Allah.
If they're just regular martyr-obsessed freakos then I don't believe they are actually motivated to die for Allah.
