Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderators: donlever, Referees

User avatar
Madcombinepilot
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1785
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Saskatoon, Sk.

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by Madcombinepilot »

Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Fri Oct 16, 2026 12:55 pm They have the cap space now with no one worth signing. Don’t drag the debt into future years with a buy out when the team may be good then and they may have players worth signing and need the cap space. They have to carry Lankinen this year as a third goalie if Demko returns. But next season his NMC ends and he can be waived to Abbotsford if he can’t be traded with a sweetener and/or retention. When the cap is tight again they can think of buying him out, but there is no need right now, and the longer they keep paying him, the less time the buyout lasts and the cheaper it gets. Just say no to buyouts!
The magic words.

We shouldn’t do a damn thing with Diesel this season. His legacy will be a small sign, hanging in the office where contract negotiations take place, written with a sharpie marker in block letters that reads: “remember the contract”.
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
User avatar
Tciso
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by Tciso »

Has any team ever had 2 goalies on buyouts at the same time?

Here's to Merilainen becoming a true 1b, and not morphing into MeriLankinen.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
theman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 2355
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by theman »

Tciso wrote: ↑Sat Oct 17, 2026 11:33 am Has any team ever had 2 goalies on buyouts at the same time?

Here's to Merilainen becoming a true 1b, and not morphing into MeriLankinen.
Edmonton?
User avatar
donlever
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 7504
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by donlever »

Nah...I don't think it has ever happened.

Hey..we could be first at something!!!
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
rockalt
MVP
MVP
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:47 pm
Location: London

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by rockalt »

I'm going to say it now - EP40's contract is going to age well. Thank you Leo Carlsson.

He is playing in a pressure-less environment with the entire fanbase soured by the disappearing act the last 2 years and increasing apathy.

I believe there's a good chance he'll average a PPG this season - someone is going to get the big minutes and PP time. If he stays on track, he will become a tradeable asset again.

Personally I think we should apply the Cody Hodgson treatment and hope for the best. Yes he'd need to waive his NMC but I expect players will be more open to waiving after another half-season of losing.
User avatar
donlever
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 7504
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:07 pm

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by donlever »

Agreed rockalt.

Several times I have stated he fits in LA very well with their top 6.

His wife from there for part of her formative years blah blah....

They are currently 0-4-2.
DeLevering since 1999.
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6387
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Ranking Jim Rutherford's top 5 most crippling untradeable rebuild stifling boat anchors

Post by Meds »

donlever wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2026 3:32 pm Agreed rockalt.

Several times I have stated he fits in LA very well with their top 6.
Oh bullshit. When have you EVER said this?

:look:

:P
Lose The Right Way
Post Reply