2025 Trade Deadline

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6262
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:05 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
So a 1st in a poor draft from 24-32. And an owner telling you no.
Basically yeah. Or hang onto him and overpay I guess.
el rey del mambo
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3072
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Hockey Widow »

Allvin overpays to get the players he wants so he can’t understand why he isn’t getting his ask for his players. He really sounded perplexed.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 7725
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Topper »

Brannstrom to the Sabres
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
theman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by theman »

Sounds like PA threw Boeser under the bus in his presser today, how much worse can this day get for the Canucks?
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3072
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Hockey Widow »

Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
Source?
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6262
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

theman wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:12 pm Sounds like PA threw Boeser under the bus in his presser today, how much worse can this day get for the Canucks?
Yeah, he bsically called him untradeable. That's nice. Brock is probably outta gher now and he walkks for nothing. This franchise just can't function with this ownership.
el rey del mambo
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6262
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:13 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
Source?
Oh come on Wids. Look at the evidence. It was a seller's market for gawd.s sake. Let's at least be straight with each other, the team bullshitting us is bad enough.Look around, no one is buying this spin from the team.
Last edited by Megaterio Llamas on Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
el rey del mambo
theman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by theman »

Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:15 pm
theman wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:12 pm Sounds like PA threw Boeser under the bus in his presser today, how much worse can this day get for the Canucks?
Yeah, he bsically called him untradeable. That's nice. Brock is probably outta gher now and he walkks for nothing. This franchise just can't function with this ownership.
Agree, it all comes back to ownership.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3072
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Hockey Widow »

The Canucks never made a secret out of not wanting to re-sign Boeser. No wonder he feels disrespected. They should have traded him right after his 40 goal season. Waited to long.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6262
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:18 pm The Canucks never made a secret out of not wanting to re-sign Boeser. No wonder he feels disrespected. They should have traded him right after his 40 goal season. Waited to long.
What the heck are they doing then? It's a disastrous turn of events.
el rey del mambo
theman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by theman »

Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:19 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:18 pm The Canucks never made a secret out of not wanting to re-sign Boeser. No wonder he feels disrespected. They should have traded him right after his 40 goal season. Waited to long.
What the heck are they doing then? It's a disastrous turn of events.
Bizarre management from this team then.
User avatar
Hockey Widow
CC Legend
Posts: 3072
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Hockey Widow »

Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:17 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:13 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
Source?
Oh come on Wids. Look at the evidence. It was a seller's market for gawd.s sake. Let's at least be straight with each other, the team bu;llshitting us is bad enough.
Still doesn’t prove they turned down a first. Let’s be honest with each other. Canucks didn’t want picks and prospects. Made it known they wanted roster player(s) so they could still compete.

Neither you nor I know what was on the table. So your guess is as good as mine. But I simply don’t buy that they turned down a 1st or any other good trade. I believe him he got offered less and that that return would inhibit our ability to make the playoffs. This was all about still making the playoffs and they felt they were better suited to do that than take any return they were being offered. This is where it is fucked up. Boston just unloaded a shitload because they can read the tea leaves. So ya, maybe that part is ownership saying playoffs or your job. This is my frustration.

We always seem to fail to move out players when other teams can move on.
The only HW the Canucks need
User avatar
Topper
CC Legend
Posts: 7725
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 8:11 pm
Location: Earth, most days.

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Topper »

Standard Ops for this management.

Destroy the player/coach before casting him aside.
Over the Internet, you can pretend to be anyone or anything.

I'm amazed that so many people choose to be complete twats.
User avatar
Cornuck
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 4456
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Everywhere

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Cornuck »

On the bright side, none of the prospects were shipped out today.
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6262
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Trade Deadline

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:24 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:17 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:13 pm
Megaterio Llamas wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:04 pm
Hockey Widow wrote: Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:02 pm I think if Canucks were offered a 1st for Boeser they would have jumped. But Allvin had previously said they were not interested in picks as much as they needed roster players with term. But I don’t buy they would turn down a first for him.
I'm certain they were offered a first. No way they weren't.
Source?
Oh come on Wids. Look at the evidence. It was a seller's market for gawd.s sake. Let's at least be straight with each other, the team bu;llshitting us is bad enough.
Still doesn’t prove they turned down a first. Let’s be honest with each other. Canucks didn’t want picks and prospects. Made it known they wanted roster player(s) so they could still compete.

Neither you nor I know what was on the table. So your guess is as good as mine. But I simply don’t buy that they turned down a 1st or any other good trade. I believe him he got offered less and that that return would inhibit our ability to make the playoffs. This was all about still making the playoffs and they felt they were better suited to do that than take any return they were being offered. This is where it is fucked up. Boston just unloaded a shitload because they can read the tea leaves. So ya, maybe that part is ownership saying playoffs or your job. This is my frustration.

We always seem to fail to move out players when other teams can move on.
Well let's disagree then, I can't believe they weren't offered anything worth trading for. He's a better hockey player than Anthony Beauvillier in my very humble opinion.The rest of your post hits the target square. Ownership wants the two gates.I used to do schtick about this stuff with Frankie, I know the drill :lol:
el rey del mambo
Post Reply