Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 10:58 pm
To now be critical of Tocchet when he has the team playing a radically different style of play since his all star goalie went down and his #1 center started slumping — and still be playing relevant hockey in the middle of the second round of playoffs — is slurping from the media straw.
Agree.
Tockey's message and approach is measured and consistent, and that has probably done more that anything else to create an identity and have the collateral effect of increasing confidence.
I don't think the Canucks have looked stale at all against the Oilers. Game 4 was the best game the Oilers played this series (IMO), and they did it by making a couple of adjustments, mainly splitting McD and Draisatl so that one of them was on the ice every 3rd shift (or more). Still, the Canucks were in it to the end thanks to Silovs, Garland, Boeser, Lindholm, and a decent job by the D. And they were in it despite not only another underwhelming performance by EP40, but with a that's-the-bad-JT game by Miller. (I've heard comments on his last shift, but all night long Miller was a mess -- the penalty he took was absolutely stupid when the game plan has to be no needless penalties against that lethal PP (and was a penalty) -- and he was a pointless turnover machine). So if your top two centers are providing negative value and you are tied with 90 second left in the third and the other team is skating well and taking liberties? I'll take it. Absent a march to the penalty box or a major injury or illness to a key player, I don't know how Edmonton can improve their odds over a coin flip if the Canucks minimize errors; and I'd favor the Canucks if they can have 2 of the Miller, Pettersson, and Lindholm lines clicking. But the bottom line, I think staying the course gives the Canucks at least even odds to win this series, and given the Oilers are a very solid team, that's a pretty good position to be in and not one to hit the change-it-all! button about.
That's not to say line up changes on the fringes aren't on the table. If it ever makes sense to play the Sushi Roll and see what he's got, it is game 5 with the season not being on the line and with the luxury of last change. I'm not sure if Hoglander's scratch is truly healthy of if he (literally) lost a testicle, but he will come back with plenty of energy if he draws in. The balance is, however, that minimizing quality chances against seems a better approach against the Oilers than trading chances. Hog isn't great on defense. Any rookie is a risk with respect to coverage, and its not like Sushi Roll comes in with a defensive reputation. So Tockey will have to weigh risks vs. benefits with that lens. Aman is not a bad penalty killer -- that's important. (Lafferty isn't a good penalty killer IMO, but you can't take two of them out and replace with zero).
Last bit, I'd put my money on EP40 having a wrist/hand issue, and possibly more. The bobble in front of his own goal the other night is consistent with that. He's hesitancy to shoot is consistent with that. He's moving his feet when the Oilers have the puck, just not when he has the puck. That's consistent with a wrist issue.