Re: Past Canuck Players
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2026 4:03 pm
How did he cherry pick? Are there quotes and links that are contrarian to his point that he omitted?
Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 7:12 pm People need to direct their ire at the obvious target, Mr. Aquilini and his Two Stooges. It gets painful to even talk about this stuff...
This is one of my favorites. Posters who haven't watched a game, but have big opinions.
This is also true. I will give him his due for giving management fair notice that it wasn't going to happen. He didn't pull a Marner. I'll give him his credit, there.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:04 pm Agreed. He did us a solid. Two things can be true at once. I’m fine with not liking any player who does not want to play for the Canucks. His contract was structured to take him to FA. I believe he always had one foot out the door.
I give the guy props for the great talent he is. I give him props for letting us know ahead of time. I still don’t like him for not wanting to play here. Emotional? Ya. He quit on this city. Fuck him.
Not strictly true. Hughes signed a 6 year deal after his ELC. Scooter signed a 3 year bridge. That's on the agent and the player as much as the team.Megaterio Llamas wrote: They bridged Hughes and locked up Scooter long-term.
I don't think his foot was out the door until they committed to Pettersson with the $11.6M contract. At that point Hughes had been teammates with a guy who had a questionable commitment to preparation and fitness, was known to be difficult to coach and work with, had rebuffed teammates attempts to work together, and was not at all carrying the load he was now being paid to carry.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:04 pm Agreed. He did us a solid. Two things can be true at once. I’m fine with not liking any player who does not want to play for the Canucks. His contract was structured to take him to FA. I believe he always had one foot out the door.
I give the guy props for the great talent he is. I give him props for letting us know ahead of time. I still don’t like him for not wanting to play here. Emotional? Ya. He quit on this city. Fuck him.
Pull a Marner???Lancer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:56 pmThis is also true. I will give him his due for giving management fair notice that it wasn't going to happen. He didn't pull a Marner. I'll give him his credit, there.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:04 pm Agreed. He did us a solid. Two things can be true at once. I’m fine with not liking any player who does not want to play for the Canucks. His contract was structured to take him to FA. I believe he always had one foot out the door.
I give the guy props for the great talent he is. I give him props for letting us know ahead of time. I still don’t like him for not wanting to play here. Emotional? Ya. He quit on this city. Fuck him.
This is one of my favorites. Posters who haven't read the discussion, but have big opinions.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:38 pmThis is one of my favorites. Posters who haven't watched a game, but have big opinions.
Dunning-Kruger at its very best.
Some play in a sand box, others decide its a career.
Right. And you don't need to read the book when you can just watch the movie.Topper wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:11 pmYou don't need to watch a game to read veteran players say they'd be happy to be traded at the deadline.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:38 pmThis is one of my favorites. Posters who haven't watched a game, but have big opinions.
Dunning-Kruger at its very best.
Some play in a sand box, others decide its a career.
Are you criticizing Bourque for requesting a trade to a contender?JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:15 pmVeteran players always want to move on from teams that aren't in contention. Ray Bourque who?Topper wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:11 pmYou don't need to watch a game to read veteran players say they'd be happy to be traded at the deadline.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:38 pmThis is one of my favorites. Posters who haven't watched a game, but have big opinions.
Dunning-Kruger at its very best.
Some play in a sand box, others decide its a career.
No.Mëds wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:22 pmAre you criticizing Bourque for requesting a trade to a contender?JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:15 pmVeteran players always want to move on from teams that aren't in contention. Ray Bourque who?Topper wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 9:11 pmYou don't need to watch a game to read veteran players say they'd be happy to be traded at the deadline.JelloPuddingPop wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2026 8:38 pmThis is one of my favorites. Posters who haven't watched a game, but have big opinions.
Dunning-Kruger at its very best.
Some play in a sand box, others decide its a career.