
*chains Blob to backend of Silverado*
VROOOO... VRRROOOOM... VRRRRROOOOOOOM
Moderator: Referees
How did the Vey trade thread ever get bumped from the front page?Strangelove wrote:Vey was worth 50th overall at the time, someone linked to the Vey trade thread the other dayRonning's Ghost wrote: I think most posters here are willing to concede that every GM is going to make a couple of mistakes, but....a 2nd round draft pick for Linden Vey seems brilliant in retrospect ?
ESQ wrote:
When people are not seeing all the blunders Benning has done, its going to be tough to have a reasonable discussion about him.....
As I said:ESQ wrote: How did the Vey trade thread ever get bumped from the front page?
Its been 3 years and people are still acting like trading a 2nd round pick for Vey is like trading Naslund for Stojanov.
When people are still harping on one of the most minor trades Benning has done, its going to be tough to have a reasonable discussion about him...
But when Doc insists thatRonning's Ghost wrote:I think most posters here are willing to concede that every GM is going to make a couple of mistakes
It seems to me reasonable to bring up his most obvious, clear-cut mistake.Strangelove wrote: EVERY SINGLE MOVE Jimmy has made since He got here seems brilliant in retrospect
July 4th, 2014Strangelove wrote:
Vey was worth 50th overall at the time, someone linked to the Vey trade thread the other day
... and I noted NO ONE here was opposed to the trade at the time.
In fact, folks were excited about inserting a youngster with such a high ceiling into the lineup!
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10393&p=209636&hilit=vey#p209636Bersnooz wrote: Used some 2nd/3rd round picks to grab Vey (unproven player) and Dorsett (elite 4th liner). Again, I'd rather use the picks to get some prospects who have greater potential. I think those type of players u can generally grab in the UFA market or waivers or swap of prospects, don't have to give up a decent pick (2nd/3rd rounder).
I will say this though, not sure if I'm really a big fan of the GM getting players who his coach likes (ie: the Medicine Hat connection). Kind of like when Neil Smith just went out and got whatever Mike Keenan wanted with the Rangers, although it did work and they won it in 94. Generally, the GM just goes out and gets the best players who he thinks will best suit his team, the coach just works with what is given to him.
Maybe Willie knows something about these players as they could be undiscovered gems who could turn out to be excellent NHLers; on the other hand, maybe they simply are what they are presently projected as... fringe NHLers (a Lonny Bohonos and Mike Brown). Time will tell.
So on July 4 2014 you posted a looooong rambling ambiguous post, big whoop Todd!Todd Bersnoozi wrote:July 4th, 2014Strangelove wrote:
Vey was worth 50th overall at the time, someone linked to the Vey trade thread the other day
... and I noted NO ONE here was opposed to the trade at the time.
In fact, folks were excited about inserting a youngster with such a high ceiling into the lineup!
....
....
....
....
Time will tell.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10393&p=209636&hilit=vey#p209636
Time did tell. We got a fringe NHLer.
That was your only comment in said thread Ned...Todd Bersnoozi [color=#FF0000]Sat Jun 28, 2014 2:15 pm[/color] wrote:Maybe a potential guy to replace Hansen on the 3rd line RW. I wonder how are his wheels and checking ability?
Actually this is what the Great Strangelove said:Ronning's Ghost wrote: But when Doc insists thatIt seems to me reasonable to bring up his most obvious, clear-cut mistake.Strangelove wrote: EVERY SINGLE MOVE Jimmy has made since He got here seems brilliant in retrospect
Your unbiased opinion is appreciated as always Mr Bubbles!Blob Mckenzie wrote:Game Set Match R G he's made you his bitch
wait...Blob Mckenzie wrote:R G he's made you his bitch
I submit that a bold assertion followed by a weaselly, ass-covering, back-pedaling, parenthetical qualifier isn't exactly top-flight forum debating form, either.Strangelove wrote:I'm disappointed, that is not how one properly debates Cliffy.![]()
I did not oppose the specifics of the trade at the time, because I bought into the narrative the Benning was an unusually astute judge of talent and may have seen things that others missed. I did oppose the principle of trading draft picks for older playersStrangelove wrote:Too bad you can't build a time machine to go back and oppose the Vey trade at the time.
Blob Mckenzie wrote:RG is Rooney ,Odd Todd is Beckham and Doc is the soccer ball. Maybe take a knee oldtimer , you're getting abused.