US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond

[Cornuck]

Doc is really concerned about your genitalia, what you do with it and with who.

[5thhorseman]

Yeah, for chrissakes Dude, it's "with whom".

[Per]

Remember when the polls said Hillary would win in a landslide?

... she did get 3 million more votes than Trump. In most countries that means you win.

Yes well, point was, the polls predicted the old hag would win the electoral college vote...

And as I said - she probably would have, had not the FBI announced, eleven days before the election, that they were re-opening that e-mail thingy investigation. She had been cleared once already, in July, and she was cleared once again in November. But that statement from the FBI may have scared off quite a few hesitant voters, which may have been enough to tip the balance in a close race.

[Chef Boi RD]

Yeah, for chrissakes Dude, it's "with whom".

Fuck, I fucked up again…BC Expat is gonna lose it!

[BCExpat]

Yeah, for chrissakes Dude, it's "with whom".

[Strangelove]

More on that alleged Trump lie about Tim Walz and dead babies...

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/clueles ... e-know-why

The simple fact is: Vice President Harris can’t tell the truth, because an honest admission of her beliefs – and the failures of the last three-and-a-half years – would doom her campaign. The ABC team did all it could to stop President Trump from telling the truth about her. The most glaring example was the blunt intervention that there were no states in which babies could be left to die after they were born. That was an outright lie. The truth is that in Tim Walz’s Minnesota at least eight babies have been left to die after botched abortions. It is a matter of public record. If you want a pro-infanticide vice president, then "Tampon Tim" is your guy.

That's a misquote of Kamala. What she said was that there are no states that have laws allowing the killing of a baby.

It's an ABC team quote, not a Kamala quote.

Reading comprehension.

Okay whatever, ABC misquoted her then. Happy?

You're still not getting it.

Kamala was not the one quoted, twas ABC moderator Linsey Davis wot said dat dere.

Reading comprehension.

I've now highlighted it, read the part in red again.

Also, it's now clear you did not watch the debate...

[Strangelove]

I see. You'll go to any lengths to rationalise Trump's statements rather than admit what he's really doing.

You basically challenged anyone to "rationalise" (sic) those 2 Trump's statements.

I took up the challenge (rather successfully IMHO) and now you whine.

Fucking Trump Derangement Syndrome...

[Strangelove]

Yeah, for chrissakes Dude, it's "with whom".

I've noticed that Chef has been wrongly using "whom" like forever.

Now the one time he should have used it... he doesn't.

Relax Chef, no one really cares, just some good-natured ribbing because we love you.

I mean it's not like anyone called you "a greasy sheep-fucker" here.

[Strangelove]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izCNetefXDg

"American Troops React to Kamala Harris's Claim of No U.S. Troops in Combat Zones"


U.S. troops are engaged in conflict in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen.

Good thing for Kamaltoe that the ABC moderators were only fact-checking Lord Trump.

[Topper]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izCNetefXDg

"American Troops React to Kamala Harris's Claim of No U.S. Troops in Combat Zones"


U.S. troops are engaged in conflict in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen.

Good thing for Kamaltoe that the ABC moderators were only fact-checking Lord Trump.

The whistler blower who sent a notarized statement detailing that ABC had agreed with the Harris campaign that certain topics would be off limits (Biden's health, her term as AG in California, her brother inlaw.....), sample questions were provided to the Harris campaign, smaller podium for her and camera locations for her coverage while Trump was speaking, no fact checking of her statements..... He also claims to have audio tapes of discussions.

He also sent the same to the Speaker of the House, ABC and others. Megyn Kelly has cautiously been covering the story and the allegations the past couple of days. One US representative is now claiming there will be a congressional investigation.

For its part, ABC put out a generica rule were followed, the debate questions were not shared (whistle blower claim only sample questions) and the moderators are doing damage control pieces on ABC morning talk shows.

Trump will be on Gutfeld on Wednesday evening. Should be hilarious.

[Topper]

Trump on Gutfeld

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6NAwzGtxAg

[Strangelove]

Trump on Gutfeld

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6NAwzGtxAg

Saw that, twas great!

[Topper]

Trump on Gutfeld

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6NAwzGtxAg

Saw that, twas great!

Broken into several videos. Posted here
https://www.foxnews.com/video/shows/gutfeld

[Topper]

Trump is asked if there are aliens at Area 51

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6362138438112

[5thhorseman]

More on that alleged Trump lie about Tim Walz and dead babies...

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/clueles ... e-know-why

The simple fact is: Vice President Harris can’t tell the truth, because an honest admission of her beliefs – and the failures of the last three-and-a-half years – would doom her campaign. The ABC team did all it could to stop President Trump from telling the truth about her. The most glaring example was the blunt intervention that there were no states in which babies could be left to die after they were born. That was an outright lie. The truth is that in Tim Walz’s Minnesota at least eight babies have been left to die after botched abortions. It is a matter of public record. If you want a pro-infanticide vice president, then "Tampon Tim" is your guy.

That's a misquote of Kamala. What she said was that there are no states that have laws allowing the killing of a baby.

It's an ABC team quote, not a Kamala quote.

Reading comprehension.

Okay whatever, ABC misquoted her then. Happy?

You're still not getting it.

Kamala was not the one quoted, twas ABC moderator Linsey Davis wot said dat dere.

Reading comprehension.

I've now highlighted it, read the part in red again.

Also, it's now clear you did not watch the debate...

Okay, noted. And you're wrong. Well, I kind of tuned out in the 2nd half.

Meanwhile, I figure Christians are ranting about SF 2995 just to get the picture of abortion survivors into people's heads. Forget whether it's rational or not, it's an effective strategy.