Page 6 of 6
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:26 pm
by UWSaint
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 8:34 am
The only thing that could justify for me the bag of burning shit Rutherford left on Gary Mason’s front stoop is they have a good offer from a team that Miller won’t waive for. Trying to force his hand so to speak. I do believe it’s Miller they want to move, the room seems to be walking on egg shells around him, a stick of dynamite with a short fuse, we’ve all worked with Cats like that. But his NTC is probably causing problems in the offers they are getting. I believe the only reason they are open to trading Pettersson is because they are getting shit offers for Miller due to his NTC and it’s gotten to the point that the two can hardly co-exist. Rutherford is probably now trying to embarrass him, making it really uncomfortable for him in wanting to stay here.
I agree Miller is the one they want to move for the reasons you posit, Chef.
I also think that it is entirely plausible in Rutherford's mind that he is trying to make things worse for JT to get him to loosen up the potential suitors, and it might make more sense if there's an offer in hand.
I don't think this is a genius move. I think it is a variation of the clown show we saw after the "Bruce, there it is" half-season. Using the media to make a guy feel unwelcome. Its Bush League. And while JR says, this won't have an effect on how they play, of course it will.
I won't speculate on why Miller took a leave. But I will posit the following hypothetical -- if you had an employee who couldn't chill out and it was causing the team performance to suffer but that guy was a really good employee, wouldn't you consider saying to that employee, "You've been burning real hard. You are such a good worker, you are so competitive, you expect the best out of all of us. We've tried to say, don't take this so hard, you aren't responsible for everyone else, but I can tell this is all getting to you. You feel the weight of the world, and it shows. But you don't need to do it all on your own; all this pressure you are feeling -- it's normal, it's what high achievers do, but it's also wearing you down, and me down, and everyone is worried about you. Maybe the best thing is a little break. To take you out of this pressure cooker. To show you, you don't have to do everything, there's a lot in your life that's important. Everything isn't work. And to make your colleagues stand on their own feet, take responsibility for the performance. Take at least 3 weeks. Take a little longer if you need. But when you've cleared your head, we will welcome you back." Rather than fight you too hard, the employee says, a little bit to your surprise, "yeah, I've tried everything else. Maybe a little time away is what I need." And then when the outsiders say, "what's going on with that employee," you say "that's his business, not for us to talk about, but I can tell you he's been doing everything that we ask of him and that we support him 100%."
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2025 2:55 pm
by Chef Boi RD
Strangelove wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:52 pm
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:37 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 12:12 pm
Zedlee wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 11:20 am
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 10:31 am
With all what Willander is witnessing unfolding before his eyes the troubled organization
whom drafted he,
the ringer his fellow Swede Petey is being rung through, one has got to wonder of Willanders desire to pony up here at seasons end. Do we see him holding out a season to test free agency? The optics don’t look good from where he’s standing. Not one bit.
More likely he'll see the lack of depth on D as a clear opportunity to play in the NHL. Maybe as a partner to Quinn. I think he'll sign.
and shake his fist at Trump.
Whoa Nellie! That’s a given, and much to the chagrin of my good friend - Strangelove!
You should be shaking your fist at your ESL teacher, you silly you-know-wot...
Thanks for the advice, Teacher
I
Don’t
Give
A
Shit
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2025 3:22 pm
by Strangelove
Well of course you don't...
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2025 4:50 pm
by Chef Boi RD
Strangelove wrote: ↑Wed Jan 29, 2025 3:22 pm
Well of course you don't...
So, just for shits n giggles then, MOD?
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:26 am
by Argay Ham
My guess is someone really stupid falls on some sword.
Or d'you think Fredo figured out the call was coming from inside the house finally?
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:49 am
by theman
TSN now has a headline: "Does winning simplify or complicate a Canucks trade?"
Jaysus, the media must be loving this.
For the record, I think it simplifies: Canucks are not desperate now and other teams realize they will have to get serious with their offers.
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:53 am
by Lancer
theman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:49 am
TSN now has a headline: "Does winning simplify or complicate a Canucks trade?"
Jaysus, the media must be loving this.
For the record, I think it simplifies: Canucks are not desperate now and other teams realize they will have to get serious with their offers.
Winning does deter the vultures. Rutherford let it be known he isn't going to bent over the barrel over the issue - serious punters with serious offers only.
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:25 am
by UWSaint
Back up goalie most of the year, 2 of the team’s 3 “stars” underperforming, back in the thick of it.
Don’t get me wrong, unless the defense (Hughes, Hronek, Myers, Soucy) is healthy, one of the two forwards looks a lot more like they did last season down the stretch (for ep40, that’s preASG), and Demko plays more like he did last night (and vs. Edmonton a couple weeks ago), this team is toast even if they scratch in. But the potential for better upside is greater than what it is if there’s a panicked deal.
Though I’ve contributed to the talk about “the room”, absent wife stealing, generally I think that stuff really is overblown. These guys want to play well, they want to win, they are playing poorly, and that brings out the worst aspects of their personality.
It’s the playing poorly stuff that comes first, not the personality. Play well and win and all that personality stuff will be an afterthought.
Re: The Rutherford Media Bomb Wager
Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:31 am
by Blob Mckenzie
Lancer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:53 am
theman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 30, 2025 9:49 am
TSN now has a headline: "Does winning simplify or complicate a Canucks trade?"
Jaysus, the media must be loving this.
For the record, I think it simplifies: Canucks are not desperate now and other teams realize they will have to get serious with their offers.
Winning does deter the vultures. Rutherford let it be known he isn't going to bent over the barrel over the issue - serious punters with serious offers only.
That's what a leader does. There's a reason the man has three cup rings.