CanucksCorner.com Forums

griz wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:If you think Brexit was bad for business...

Brexit has been bad for business? That's not what Nigel Farage is claiming...

(youtube)

griz wrote:Brexit can turn out to be a huge success :

(youtube).

Strangelove wrote:You're flailing away like a bloody beaten blind man UK.

I'M LOVING THIS!!

Strangelove wrote: Yeah, it looks pretty bad when you quote someone completely out of context.

You posted exactly .3% of my total words in this thread btw.

Thanks for proving yet-again that you ignore any+all points made by any+all opponents.

BTW you started the Chicken Little conversation by first posting "I am not a Chicken Little..."

(begging the rebuttal: "Actually you are a Chicken Little because..."

Damon first called moi "passive-aggressive"... I merely returned the favour with a attached.

"Gong-show monkey" is commonly used as a description of a dumb post.

"Schmuck" + asking someone if he's being "stupid"... does this really hurt anyone's feelings?

"Fully indoctrinated, bat shit crazy" = brainwashed folks who won't/can't listen to reason.

"Brainwashed zombie" = more of the same.

"Deluded self-righteous totalitarian folk" + "environazi" + "leftist" = fair descriptions of someone.

(there are many people in the world who fairly fit those descriptions, what's the problem?)

"Goosestepping"... I already gave Webster's definition of that word = "mindless".

"ESL buddy"... Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you said you are an ESL teacher overseas?

"your Irish politician friend was a PEDOPHILE" = TRUTH!!

"but yes, a homosexual pedophile"... wtf your Irish politician admits it, is PROUD of it!

"an antisemitic moron”... is exactly what I proved you to be in that linked thread.

"tramp stamp"... I did not say that, try again.

Damon stated he's "not as much of a man as Fred McFeely Rogers"... I merely underscored it.

"Tree-boinkers" = "tree-huggers".

"Drama Queen" + "Prison Bitch"... were a tongue-in-cheek response to this Damon post:

damonberryman Thu Aug 11, 2016 8:08 am wrote:
Are you married Per? If not would you consider a long distance relationship with an East End boy who visited Oakalla and the old B.C. Pen too many times? I have chilled a lot but that may be due to the weed and benzos but let us not get caught up in details. I currently live in NY and am both Canadian and a British citizen so we will have to do this thing before Brexit is implemented.


Fair response to a post like that no?

Y'know, some folk like to have a little fun around here sometimes IF that is FUCKING okay with you!

ukcanuck wrote:
lets not pretend that any of the above is meaningful as reasonable debate


Yeahno, the other 99.7% of my words contained the “reasonable debate” part.

Sure I use colourful language, but you’ve likened me to Mcarthy, Onceler and a Jehovah’s Witness.

You also said I “label any and all criticism of Isreal as racist and antisemitism”.

You said I was falsely referring to your Irish politician friend as a PEDOPHILE (he admits it).

You claimed you weren’t nailed for spreading lies in the linked thread.

You claimed that everything I’ve said in this thread is summed-up by the out-of-context .3% above.

Yup, a cunt such as yourself should expect to have a few colourful words/phrases shot his way.

Per wrote:If you are willing, we could make a bet on whether the UK, leaving the EU, or Sweden, staying on, will have a higher GDP growth over the 2017-2021 period.

Strangelove wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:child.

Strangelove wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:child.

Antisemitic holocaust denier.

griz wrote:

Per wrote:If you are willing, we could make a bet on whether the UK, leaving the EU, or Sweden, staying on, will have a higher GDP growth over the 2017-2021 period.

A five+ year bet! The Canucks should be a great team by then. What is the wager Per? What if Sweden leaves the EU?

griz wrote:Top Expert: World Government Entering Death Spiral

ukcanuck wrote:

Strangelove wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:child.

Antisemitic holocaust denier.

Haha well, since Derangedlove always lowers the discussion in correlation with his inability to debate his tin hat theories. I'll take the derision in stride.

Attack the man and not the argument hey doc ?

Strangelove Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:36 pm wrote: (UK has) spread nothing but lies about yours truly:

"libertarian".... "Zionist"… “Anarcho-Capitalist”… “paleo-conservative”... "right wing conservative"
“elitist Jew”... “Climate Change denier”... “a member of the Moral Majority”... “homophobic”
one who “wants to hurry the second coming of Jesus”
one who “labels any and all criticism of Isreal(sic) as racist and antisemitism”
one who “falsely identifies a PEDOPHILE as a PEDOPHILE”
one who “doesn’t understand gay rights because he ID’s a PEDOPHILE as a PEDOPHILE”

(yes all lies, the last two comments being, as they say, "Crazy Like Hillary")

ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:22 pm[/color] wrote:

Cornuck wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:

Cornuck wrote:Pretty much sums up the whole situation...

http://www.tomatobubble.com/pussyriot.html

ummm have you looked at other pages on this website? think they might be a bunch holocaust deniers ??

Nope - but does that make this theory any less plausible?

yahaa it totally makes the theory less plausible

ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:26 pm[/color] wrote: Good point, but you're then asking a lot of the education system. Imagine the budget increases required to teach them that the holocaust actually...

ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:04 pm[/color] wrote: The New York Times is wholly owned by a Jewish family who are clearly apart of the established jewish dominated media community in North America.

The same interest group that has funded american geopolitics for the last hundred or so years.

The same interest group that cut its teeth in propaganda in two world wars

ukcanuck [b][color=#FF0000]Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:03 am[/color][/b] wrote: It doesn't take rocket science to suggest that the [media] people on the [lengthy] list below would have ethnic, political, cultural and religious reasons to be supportive of the state of Israel.

Strangelove wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:

Strangelove wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:child.

Antisemitic holocaust denier.

Haha well, since Derangedlove always lowers the discussion in correlation with his inability to debate his tin hat theories. I'll take the derision in stride.

Attack the man and not the argument hey doc ?

Now why does that sound so familiar...

OH YES... you do exactly that, only you do so with lies:

Strangelove Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:36 pm wrote: (UK has) spread nothing but lies about yours truly:

"libertarian".... "Zionist"… “Anarcho-Capitalist”… “paleo-conservative”... "right wing conservative"
“elitist Jew”... “Climate Change denier”... “a member of the Moral Majority”... “homophobic”
one who “wants to hurry the second coming of Jesus”
one who “labels any and all criticism of Isreal(sic) as racist and antisemitism”
one who “falsely identifies a PEDOPHILE as a PEDOPHILE”
one who “doesn’t understand gay rights because he ID’s a PEDOPHILE as a PEDOPHILE”

(yes all lies, the last two comments being, as they say, "Crazy Like Hillary")

What about THAT Mr Pants of Fire?

As for yours truly, well I hit folks over the head with truth, check it out:

ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:22 pm[/color] wrote:

Cornuck wrote:

ukcanuck wrote:

Cornuck wrote:Pretty much sums up the whole situation...

http://www.tomatobubble.com/pussyriot.html

ummm have you looked at other pages on this website? think they might be a bunch holocaust deniers ??

Nope - but does that make this theory any less plausible?

yahaa it totally makes the theory less plausible

ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:26 pm[/color] wrote: Good point, but you're then asking a lot of the education system. Imagine the budget increases required to teach them that the holocaust actually...

ukcanuck [color=#FF0000]Tue Oct 07, 2014 7:04 pm[/color] wrote: The New York Times is wholly owned by a Jewish family who are clearly apart of the established jewish dominated media community in North America.

The same interest group that has funded american geopolitics for the last hundred or so years.

The same interest group that cut its teeth in propaganda in two world wars

ukcanuck [b][color=#FF0000]Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:03 am[/color][/b] wrote: It doesn't take rocket science to suggest that the [media] people on the [lengthy] list below would have ethnic, political, cultural and religious reasons to be supportive of the state of Israel.

Remember what I said about your pattern of accidentally giving yourself away

... followed by VEHEMENT denial?

Time to come clean bro.

Next up: Is UK a Christian Catholic or a ______?

Topper wrote:goat fucker you say?

ukcanuck wrote:

Topper wrote:goat fucker you say?

One word topper...
Hanger on