CanucksCorner.com Forums

donlever wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:22 pm

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:01 pm Highly unlikely can easily segway

Does Highly ride one of these whilst doing so?

Yes. Yes they were

Segeuaeuay then

Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:34 pm I don’t Doc, that doesn’t exactly cut the mustard

Well you're the bible expert Dude.

You do know the bible is a spiritual book, not a science textbook right?

My Bible knowledge is extremely limited but just because the word Dinosaur is not used (the etymology of dinosaur being the mid 1800's when "deinos" (terrible, powerful) was mated with sauros (lizard) - obviously long after "pen" was put to "paper" in what became the Sciptures) does not mean they were not noted.

30 seconds of research.....


Job 40:15-19

“Look at Behemoth, which I made along with you and which feeds on grass like an ox. What strength it has in its loins, what power in the muscles of its belly! Its tail sways like a cedar; the sinews of its thighs are close-knit. Its bones are tubes of bronze, its limbs like rods of iron. It ranks first among the works of God, yet its Maker can approach it with His sword.”

Isaiah 27:1

“In that day, the LORD will punish with his sword— his fierce, great, and powerful sword— Leviathan the gliding serpent, Leviathan the coiling serpent; he will slay the monster of the sea.”

Genesis 9:2

“The fear and dread of you will fall on all the beasts of the earth, and on all the birds in the sky, on every creature that moves along the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; they are given into your hands.”

Where are human remains or evidence of humans fossilized in pre K/T boundary rocks?

Hey man....I'm not defending sweet fuck all here.

I have zero skin in this game.

Simply responding to Dude and his no dinosaur in the Bible comment.

Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 10:51 am

5thhorseman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 8:29 am You mean the science that if mankind cannot figure it out then it must be impossible?

Yes, it's scientifically impossible until proven otherwise...

Lol, whether it's impossible or not doesn't depend on whether some human can understand it.

5thhorseman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 2:03 pm

Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 10:51 am

5thhorseman wrote: ↑Sun Jan 12, 2025 8:29 am You mean the science that if mankind cannot figure it out then it must be impossible?

Yes, it's scientifically impossible until proven otherwise...

Lol, whether it's impossible or not doesn't depend on whether some human can understand it.

I didn't say it's impossible, I said it's scientifically impossible.

As in, according to our science.

In this case: It's scientifically impossible for life to come from nonlife (abiogenesis).

And yes, we're talking about human science, do you know of any other kind?

Our science has proven it's impossible?

Or our science just doesn't know (yet)?

Science isn’t stagnant. It evolves, discoveries lead to discoveries. What they couldn’t explain at the the time when humans were writing bibles, they called it an act of god like lightning. The only thing stuck in time is religion while science speeds ahead, forever boldly going where man has never been before

To give you an idea of how archaic religion is, Mohammed married a 6 year old named Aisha. Deflowered her when she was 9. And it is because of this that is why Islamic extremist asylum seekers are raping underaged white girls all throughout Europe. They say they are allowed as it is Sharia Law. How fucked up is that shit?

Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:39 am Science isn’t stagnant. It evolves, discoveries lead to discoveries. What they couldn’t explain at the the time when humans were writing bibles, they called it an act of god like lightning. The only thing stuck in time is religion while science speeds ahead, forever boldly going where man has never been before

To give you an idea of how archaic religion is, Mohammed married a 6 year old named Aisha. Deflowered her when she was 9. And it is because of this that is why Islamic extremist asylum seekers are raping underaged white girls all throughout Europe. They say they are allowed as it is Sharia Law. How fucked up is that shit?

Part of the fucked up part of that is in the logic. Theirs for the alleged justification of the act and yours for correlating.

Mohammed MARRIED a girl, age not withstanding, he married her.

Raping underaged girls who are not even part of your religion, let alone in any sort of consensual relationship, is not same-same.

Old enough for the lipstick, old enough for the dipstick
-the prophet Mohammed

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 12:14 pm Old enough for the lipstick, old enough for the dipstick
-the prophet Mohammed

As long as they are menstruating is their justification. Fucked up shit.

Mohammed had to wait until Aisha was 9, (married her at age 6) I gather when she started menstruating, to “deflower” her.

Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 12:20 pm

Cousin Strawberry wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 12:14 pm Old enough for the lipstick, old enough for the dipstick
-the prophet Mohammed

As long as they are menstruating is their justification. Fucked up shit.

Mohammed had to wait until Aisha was 9, (married her at age 6) I gather when she started menstruating, to “deflower” her.

Sounds like the French president Macron and his "nanny"

The Rolling Stone's Bill Wyman had to wait three years for his girlfriend to turn 18 so he could marry her.

Topper wrote: ↑Mon Jan 13, 2025 12:48 pm The Rolling Stone's Bill Wyman had to wait three years for his girlfriend to turn 18 so he could marry her.

You shake my nerves and you rattle my brain