Re: 2025 NHL Draft Class
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2025 8:46 am
I thought we were done with this Elmer bullshit.
Yah, I thought we were going to take Matty Tkachuk that year as well. His scoring totals were really impressive and he teared it up in the OHL playoffs.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:11 pm I was shocked we didn’t draft Tkachuk. I think the reason why we didn’t draft goes deeper than liking Juolevi more.
I believe with them drafting two wingers in a row from the previous two drafts in Virtanen and Boeser helped seal the deal on drafting a D-man (Juolevi) over another winger (Tkachuk). The previous GM (Gillis) didn’t draft a D-man in the first round over 6 drafts. The last time a GM used a first round pick on a D-man prior to Elms drafting Juolevi was Nonis when he drafted Bourdon in 2007. Remember, Gillis could’ve drafted BC kid Shea Theodore (Aldergrove) but decided on Shinkaruk instead. Maybe had Gillis drafted Theodore we would’ve drafted Tkachuk?Todd Bersnoozi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 06, 2025 6:59 pmYah, I thought we were going to take Matty Tkachuk that year as well. His scoring totals were really impressive and he teared it up in the OHL playoffs.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Fri Apr 04, 2025 8:11 pm I was shocked we didn’t draft Tkachuk. I think the reason why we didn’t draft goes deeper than liking Juolevi more.
I can get that JB really wanted a good young D-man into the organizational depth chart, but he picked the wrong guy and passed on some really good ones. Sergachev, Chychrun and a much coveted RS D, McAvoy all went shortly after. Two of those guys put up similar numbers to Juolevi and all 3 of them were well built (like 200+ lbs). Instead, JB went with a bird bones who was a bit injury prone.![]()
I like the reports on this kid. Should be in our wheelhouseCornuck wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 7:38 am Anyone know more about Jack Nesbitt - C - ranked 15th? Big kid, PPG player
https://www.eliteprospects.com/player/8 ... ck-nesbitt
Funny thing about the kid is he's ranked 15 in the NHL draft prospect rankings, but he's nowhere to be seen in the first round of any of the usual mock drafts you see on the net. He has good size and a projectable frame, appears to get around the ice well enough, but there doesn't seem to be anything dynamic about his game. Unless management is convinced that he can develop his skillset to be a 2C in the NHL - a pretty big jump for the kid IMO, then yeah, give the kid a pass. More than a few centres in that range who fit the profile of good 3C-ceiling, when there are top-6 wingers available in the likes of Carbonneau.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:31 pm If he sounds anything like Brendan “Billy Beane” Gaunce stay the hell away!
A Gillis classic
Yeah, I don't really see the argument for a team -- especially a team where I believe the Canucks are on the development curve -- spending a top 20 draft pick on a player with a low projected ceiling, even if he has a high projected likelihood of actually making the NHL.Lancer wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:55 pmFunny thing about the kid is he's ranked 15 in the NHL draft prospect rankings, but he's nowhere to be seen in the first round of any of the usual mock drafts you see on the net. He has good size and a projectable frame, appears to get around the ice well enough, but there doesn't seem to be anything dynamic about his game. Unless management is convinced that he can develop his skillset to be a 2C in the NHL - a pretty big jump for the kid IMO, then yeah, give the kid a pass. More than a few centres in that range who fit the profile of good 3C-ceiling, when there are top-6 wingers available in the likes of Carbonneau.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:31 pm If he sounds anything like Brendan “Billy Beane” Gaunce stay the hell away!
A Gillis classic
I just saw Nesbitt at the same 15-spot on the SN rankings - unless they copy-pasted from the NHL rankings. Noticed another article highlighting Nesbitt as one of the biggest risers over the Spring in the prospect rankings. We'll see where this kid goes.Ronning's Ghost wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 2:40 pmYeah, I don't really see the argument for a team -- especially a team where I believe the Canucks are on the development curve -- spending a top 20 draft pick on a player with a low projected ceiling, even if he has a high projected likelihood of actually making the NHL.Lancer wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:55 pmFunny thing about the kid is he's ranked 15 in the NHL draft prospect rankings, but he's nowhere to be seen in the first round of any of the usual mock drafts you see on the net. He has good size and a projectable frame, appears to get around the ice well enough, but there doesn't seem to be anything dynamic about his game. Unless management is convinced that he can develop his skillset to be a 2C in the NHL - a pretty big jump for the kid IMO, then yeah, give the kid a pass. More than a few centres in that range who fit the profile of good 3C-ceiling, when there are top-6 wingers available in the likes of Carbonneau.Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 12:31 pm If he sounds anything like Brendan “Billy Beane” Gaunce stay the hell away!
A Gillis classic
I think a player like that makes much more sense late in the 1st round, or even late in the 2nd round (to a team that already has game-breakers).