Re: LOL
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:28 pm
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/ ... -162246797
Why do 95% of HFCanucks folk sound like Blob?
Why do 95% of HFCanucks folk sound like Blob?
a man of many socksStrangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:28 pm https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/ ... -162246797
Why do 95% of HFCanucks folk sound like Blob?
You can take the Blob out of Pitt Lake, but you can’t take the Pitt Lake out of BlobStrangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:28 pm https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/ ... -162246797
Why do 95% of HFCanucks folk sound like Blob?
You can wedge out of widgeon but can you widgeon the wedge out?RoyalDude wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:12 pmYou can take the Blob out of Pitt Lake, but you can’t take the Pitt Lake out of BlobStrangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:28 pm https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/ ... -162246797
Why do 95% of HFCanucks folk sound like Blob?
So the talent pool, cap space and Miller trade are good, but the guy who made them is bad, can not be trusted to make good decisions and needs to be fired.Burke's Evil Spirit -
Well I won't speak for MS but here's how I see it:
- The Canucks as constructed aren't close to being a playoff team, generally speaking.
- In a weirdly easy season in the Western Conference, the Canucks could have made the playoffs as a one-off if a few small things broke their way.
- There's enough talent and cap space here that a decent GM could just needs to add depth pieces and expect to have a pretty good team. Not a contender, but in the playoffs. This makes it unlikely that the Canucks will concede a high pick in 2021 to Tampa Bay.
- Jim Benning is not that GM.
So the Miller trade, in general, is not a bad one to make. But with this management group at the helm? Potentially catastrophic.
Lunatics.Topper wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:18 pmSo the talent pool, cap space and Miller trade are good, but the guy who made them is bad, can not be trusted to make good decisions and needs to be fired.Burke's Evil Spirit -
Well I won't speak for MS but here's how I see it:
- The Canucks as constructed aren't close to being a playoff team, generally speaking.
- In a weirdly easy season in the Western Conference, the Canucks could have made the playoffs as a one-off if a few small things broke their way.
- There's enough talent and cap space here that a decent GM could just needs to add depth pieces and expect to have a pretty good team. Not a contender, but in the playoffs. This makes it unlikely that the Canucks will concede a high pick in 2021 to Tampa Bay.
- Jim Benning is not that GM.
So the Miller trade, in general, is not a bad one to make. But with this management group at the helm? Potentially catastrophic.
https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/ ... -162461485
So the consensus is, there is no consensus. Seems like 6M would be about right but in FA you know it will be more. With term being the stumbling block, the difference between 5 years and seven.micky107 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:07 pm Winnipeg Reddit; Currently discussing the Canucks asparations of acquiring Tyler Myers.
It's just for fun...
.
https://www.reddit.com/r/winnipegjets/c ... efenseman/
5 years is plenty. Doubt that big bod of his is in the same discussion as fine wine.Hockey Widow wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 9:54 pmSo the consensus is, there is no consensus. Seems like 6M would be about right but in FA you know it will be more. With term being the stumbling block, the difference between 5 years and seven.micky107 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:07 pm Winnipeg Reddit; Currently discussing the Canucks asparations of acquiring Tyler Myers.
It's just for fun...
.
https://www.reddit.com/r/winnipegjets/c ... efenseman/
Giving him 7 million a year puts him into the top 15 paid D men in the league. By most accounts his ability puts him somewhere between 90 and 120.micky107 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:07 pm Winnipeg Reddit; Currently discussing the Canucks asparations of acquiring Tyler Myers.
It's just for fun...
.
https://www.reddit.com/r/winnipegjets/c ... efenseman/
Brains McKenzieBlob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:33 am
This should be a no brainer to not give him much more than 4 or 5 million per year over 5 years.
Great contribution as usualRoyalDude wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 6:48 amBrains McKenzieBlob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:33 am
This should be a no brainer to not give him much more than 4 or 5 million per year over 5 years.
The Legend
“A 5th for Hayes!”
“A 5th for Hayes!”Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 6:51 amGreat contribution as usualRoyalDude wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 6:48 amBrains McKenzieBlob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Wed Jun 26, 2019 5:33 am
This should be a no brainer to not give him much more than 4 or 5 million per year over 5 years.
The Legend
“A 5th for Hayes!”