Are you saying Jake caught the "Eugenie Bouchard" syndrome?SKYO wrote:I know it's junior goals, but man Virtanen was a beast.
I think if healthy and away from willie next season, gets away from the hot shot/bieber partier style of living, PLUS having confidence we could see a viable top 9/top 6 Virtanen in time, he'll probably have like 5-6 years of dominance IF he can reach his full potential, which will be when he's like around 22-27 years of age the prime time for a power forward.
JV will be turning 21 this August, lets hope we see a new energized and a more mature Virtanen at camp this September.
Canucks Young Guns
Moderator: Referees
Re: Canucks Young Guns
"evolution"
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Rick Dhaliwal of NEWS 1130 tweeted out:
Utica GM Conacher says in the last 5 games, he can see why the Canucks drafted Virtanen so high, "He's big guy who can skate & has great shot."
"Over the last 10 games his conditioning got better and he became a better player."
Conacher says Virtanen is still young, the points will come and patience is required by everyone, "he's still maturing."
Conacher on Jordan Subban : "His play without the puck is a work in progress but he skates great and competes so hard."
Demko playing better the more he plays.
Utica GM Conacher says in the last 5 games, he can see why the Canucks drafted Virtanen so high, "He's big guy who can skate & has great shot."
"Over the last 10 games his conditioning got better and he became a better player."
Conacher says Virtanen is still young, the points will come and patience is required by everyone, "he's still maturing."
Conacher on Jordan Subban : "His play without the puck is a work in progress but he skates great and competes so hard."
Demko playing better the more he plays.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
No matter what level, goalies gotta play.
Too much time off, when healthy, and their routines, (rituals if you want). get all messed up.
Too much time off, when healthy, and their routines, (rituals if you want). get all messed up.
"evolution"
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Injuries, Skyo, Injuries. Boucher might be the 14th forward, but he'll still likely get 50 games due to injuries. We can use him as a depth forward.SKYO wrote:right!?!
But really, if JV/Boeser make the team,
bart/bo/grans
sedins/eriksson
goldy/sutter/boeser
chaput/dorsett/JV/ rodin?or-nah
crama/shore/gaunce whoever survives the deadleh offseason (contracts/expansion draft etc) 4th liners.
I can't see where Boucher would fit, he sucks defensively, but his offensive upside is pretty good, it's a shame, but I think with the right team where he can be afforded a lot of slack and time he can be a good sniper.
The Cup is soooooo ours!!!!!!!
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 9158
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Canucks Young Guns
I have said on several occasions how much I like Horvat, Tryamkin and Stecher. Granlund has improved but still needs to bulk up and play a stronger defensive game. I don't mind Baertschi. The rest are pretty meh. Boeser is not an NHL skater right now and should apprentice in the minors which is where Virtanen should be. Sure there's lots of youth but there isn't lots of high end youth as Skyo and and the guzzlers seem to think. They need a lot more blue chippers in the pipeline for this team to return to the playoffs.Cornuck wrote:Even without the sarcasm, have you ever seen the Canucks with this much youth? Sure, not every player in the pool is going to pan out - but there's enough potential there to make even you feel a little hopeful, isn't there?Blob Mckenzie wrote:I don't think I've ever seen a team with soooo much youth !!!
My memory may be failing me, but has this franchise EVER has this many good players not in the lineup?
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: Canucks Young Guns
I have to agree with you - to a point - I'm not sure about "a lot more" - but one or two bonafide first line talents would set this rebuild up nicely.Blob Mckenzie wrote:They need a lot more blue chippers in the pipeline for this team to return to the playoffs.
We have some great 'potential' in goal - and our D is young and will develop. We should have a number of solid 2nd liners, but we'll be lacking the WCE, Sedin type first line we've grown accustomed to.
Re: Canucks Young Guns
At the draft acquiring a quality center would be great to add to all the winger youth we all of sudden have.Cornuck wrote:I have to agree with you - to a point - I'm not sure about "a lot more" - but one or two bonafide first line talents would set this rebuild up nicely.Blob Mckenzie wrote:They need a lot more blue chippers in the pipeline for this team to return to the playoffs.
We have some great 'potential' in goal - and our D is young and will develop. We should have a number of solid 2nd liners, but we'll be lacking the WCE, Sedin type first line we've grown accustomed to.
If that can't happen then hope a Kerfoot can become available.
Otherwise patience is a virtue for someone like Gaudette who seems like a great #2 center down the road, and he won't be available till the Sedins retire so that's good timing.
A lot of options to continue adding blue chippers.
Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 9158
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Canucks Young Guns
I have no problem with Kerfoot but at what point does the parade of 170-180 pound forwards stop?
The team is full of soft dinky little guys who wouldn't break a dozen eggs in the corners fighting for a puck.
Enough already ! Where's the beef Elmer !!????
The team is full of soft dinky little guys who wouldn't break a dozen eggs in the corners fighting for a puck.
Enough already ! Where's the beef Elmer !!????
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Speaking of beef, leaves writers/fans getting cocky with Nylander lately while kicking sand on Virtanen, ultimate jinxing if there ever was one.


Can the Canucks just win a Cup within the next 5 years.
- Island Nucklehead
- MVP
- Posts: 1218
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
- Location: Ottawa
Re: Canucks Young Guns
They're not wrong. Nylander is clearly the better player.SKYO wrote:Speaking of beef, leaves writers/fans getting cocky with Nylander lately while kicking sand on Virtanen, ultimate jinxing if there ever was one.
- Blob Mckenzie
- MVP
- Posts: 9158
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
- Location: Oakalla
Re: Canucks Young Guns
It isn't cocky.SKYO wrote:Speaking of beef, leaves writers/fans getting cocky with Nylander lately while kicking sand on Virtanen, ultimate jinxing if there ever was one.
They got a stud
We got a scrub
Blobcat out
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
- Strangelove
- Moderator & MVP
- Posts: 15895
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 12:13 pm
- Location: Someday
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Nylander has had at least two concussions so far, we'll see.
Wobbly Blob complains "Where's the beef?"... and then complains about young Virtanen.
Everyone knows power forwards take longer to develop and that y'gotta have patience in a rebuild...
Wobbly Blob complains "Where's the beef?"... and then complains about young Virtanen.
Everyone knows power forwards take longer to develop and that y'gotta have patience in a rebuild...
____
Try to focus on someday.
Try to focus on someday.
- Lancer
- CC Hall of Fan Member
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
- Location: Kingston, Ontario
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Little after the fact, but would mention this - was at a 67's game last Sunday with Hamilton in town (for whom prospect Cole Candella plays). Candella, despite being an over-ager, didn't see appreciably more ice time than anybody else on the blueline but the coach was spreading the ice time around relatively evenly.
Candella was steady, made no glaring plays either way, until his one-timer pulled Hamilton ahead. It was a beauty. Pretty much bar-down in an instant and he got it off in a hurry. Kid definitely has a shot from the point. We'll see if he can get it through at the next level.
Not much of a scouting report, I know, but I liked what I saw in the kid. We'll see how he goes.
Candella was steady, made no glaring plays either way, until his one-timer pulled Hamilton ahead. It was a beauty. Pretty much bar-down in an instant and he got it off in a hurry. Kid definitely has a shot from the point. We'll see if he can get it through at the next level.
Not much of a scouting report, I know, but I liked what I saw in the kid. We'll see how he goes.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.
Hate the League.
Hate the League.
- Hockey Widow
- CC Legend
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:52 pm
Re: Canucks Young Guns
A breakdown of the kids starting in the CHL playoff drive to the Memorial Cup.
https://www.nhl.com/canucks/news/canuck ... -288024012
https://www.nhl.com/canucks/news/canuck ... -288024012
The only HW the Canucks need
Re: Canucks Young Guns
Yeah, Juolevi on Sportsnet 360 at 4:30 this afternoon...Hockey Widow wrote:A breakdown of the kids starting in the CHL playoff drive to the Memorial Cup.
https://www.nhl.com/canucks/news/canuck ... -288024012
"evolution"