Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:39 amBoeser, the quiet leader, the patriarch, the calming influence.






Moderator: Referees
Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:39 amBoeser, the quiet leader, the patriarch, the calming influence.
This post 'bout sums up my thoughts...Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:57 am It’s weird. I think I finally like how the Canucks’ defence is shaping up moving forward. If Myers continues to play the way he has all season, they have a nice top four. I’ve always been impressed with Marcus Pettersson and when healthy Hronek and Hughes are a nice top pairing. That’s two righties and two lefties just like Tocchet likes.
Behind them they have four youngsters - again two on each side - that have very good potential to be successful in the NHL. Willander and Mancini on the right and DePetey and Kudryavsev on the left. I don’t think it is unreasonable to expect to see each of them playing some games with Vancouver next season.
Between the top four and the four young defencemen, they have decent bottom pairing placeholders in Soucy and Forbort.
There is a good chance more limited players like Juulsen and Friedman won’t be needed in the top six in the future unless an extreme rash of injuries occur.
It’s been a long time since the Canucks have iced a solid defensive group, but I think they are there once they sign Marcus Pettersson to an extension and Willander finishes college.
Baring re-injury Demko and Lankinen make a good goalie tandem.
I won’t be surprised if the Canucks use their first rounder to add to the top six forwards (ideally a centre with term) in the coming weeks.
But whatever the case, this team should be much better at holding on to leads with their new defensive group.
The concern is, can they get enough clutch scoring from this forward group without Miller?
It’d be helpful if DeBrusk and Boeser could contribute consistently.
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:53 pm Yeah, I'd kill for a top-6 power forward like JT Miller right now (if we didn't have to give up a top prospect).
I'll take credit for that one.
Strangelove wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 5:09 pm I'll take credit for that one.
Donlever would never conceive of such a thing.![]()
That's some serious silver-linings hunting, there. The kid looked alright last night. He had some good-looking moves and scored the kind of goal Tocchet's been crying for all season. He was also responsible for the OT goal against. Coughs up the puck in the O-zone, and I'm watching the Wings' rush into the zone asking myself, "Where's Chytil?" only to see him appear as DeBrincat scores. Those are some serious "Bad Miller" flashbacks there. I'd like to see if this kid can pass, or whether he gets blinders on when he gets the puck.Nuckertuzzi wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 5:33 pm Now, to add some positive hope for our forwards. Been wondering about Chytil. He got sidelined for essentially the entire season last year, which timeline-wise could've/should've been a breakout year following the nice productive year he had the season prior.
So...could it be that the injury only set his development back a year and we are getting him at the perfect time when he's just on the verge of a breakout? After missing an entire year, which should be a massive roadblock in any player's recovery, he's already matched his production pace from 2022/23 with limited ice time, so that could be a great sign for even bigger, better things to come. Not expecting a Miller-esque breakout the season we acquired him, but could certainly add another layer to the whole trade.
Holistically-speaking, you're not wrong. They shipped out wasted cap in Desharnais and Heinen and got more cap space. They got a middle-six forward. They got a defenceman who, by some pundits' accounts is a functional NHL top-4 defenceman. They filled spaces - and not with AHL scrubs masquerading as NHL players. Not terrible.Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:22 am Look at it as one deal if you can. And I never do ths but if you consider what they started with on Fiday and what they ended up with, its not horrible.
People have been bitching about Heinen and Desharnais all season. They're history - cap dumps at the price of a Melvin Belvin. Pettersson was the best UFA on the market. He was getting a mid to late first all day and with 27 mill in cap space Im sure they'll sign him. Hes thin but hes a damn good D man.
You deal a 32 year old top end forward that had worn out his welcome here. He is absolutely the best player in both deals but he couldn't play nice with others, a couple scrubs nobody wanted and a couple meh prospects.
They ended up with a legit top 4 LD who is 28, a 25 year old mid six centre with size and speed who has scored at a 40 point pace playing 13 min and a solid prospect and a pile of cap space. Its not horrible.
Lancer wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 9:55 amThat's some serious silver-linings hunting, there. The kid looked alright last night. He had some good-looking moves and scored the kind of goal Tocchet's been crying for all season. He was also responsible for the OT goal against. Coughs up the puck in the O-zone, and I'm watching the Wings' rush into the zone asking myself, "Where's Chytil?" only to see him appear as DeBrincat scores. Those are some serious "Bad Miller" flashbacks there. I'd like to see if this kid can pass, or whether he gets blinders on when he gets the puck.Nuckertuzzi wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 5:33 pm Now, to add some positive hope for our forwards. Been wondering about Chytil. He got sidelined for essentially the entire season last year, which timeline-wise could've/should've been a breakout year following the nice productive year he had the season prior.
So...could it be that the injury only set his development back a year and we are getting him at the perfect time when he's just on the verge of a breakout? After missing an entire year, which should be a massive roadblock in any player's recovery, he's already matched his production pace from 2022/23 with limited ice time, so that could be a great sign for even bigger, better things to come. Not expecting a Miller-esque breakout the season we acquired him, but could certainly add another layer to the whole trade.
Not to say there's no further upside with him, but he's 25 - there's a significant probability that what you see is what you get with him. Not bad, but it doesn't look like he's going to move the needle much - and not near as much as "Good Miller".
Fair point, and I think the problem is that management (read:owners) were not going to wait until the season played out if there was still a chance to salvage it. I just hope that they don't think we're going all the way this year and trade some picks and prospects to shoot their wad again.Nuckertuzzi wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 12:10 pm I would've rather NOT make the trade for either Miller or Petey, and lived with the pain until the offseason. But that's all water under the bridge now. So all in all I think we actually could have done worse. That's the way I look at it.
Anyone is management who thinks this team is going to last a round with the way they're playing and carrying themselves - well-past the half-way point of the season - is seriously high on their own supply. This team is not getting it done - and that's assuming they even make the playoffs. The players look like they want the season to end already.Cornuck wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 12:22 pm Fair point, and I think the problem is that management (read:owners) were not going to wait until the season played out if there was still a chance to salvage it. I just hope that they don't think we're going all the way this year and trade some picks and prospects to shoot their wad again.