Re: CC Random thread
Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2020 10:23 am
Let's tackle these in reverse order.

In any case, I highly doubt anything that the "real BLM" says will change the actions of the fake BLM'ers. Much of the looting and burning is because they're poor, and because of wider racism issues. So anything BLM does would be merely symbolic. So not doing something symbolic makes them evil? Sorry, that's a stretch.
I generally don't believe in the "under so-and-so's watch" argument, and if you search your archives you'll find I've never used this argument. You can't just point the finger based on timing; there needs to be a more direct causal link. It's the same sort of argument as linking stock market performance to presidents. It's a bullshit tangent.Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:15 pm Nothing about this group first taking to the streets under Obama's watch #5?![]()
Do you have anything solid here, or are you just choosing what you want to believe. Be honestStrangelove wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:15 pm Let's be honest, these motherfuckers are encouraging the mayhem.
Sure, in an ideal world, protests would all be peaceful and societal change could be achieved through honest dialogue. But that's not the world we live in, is it?Strangelove wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:15 pm The debate was about why "the real BLM" leadership won't come out and condemn said Burning, Looting, Murder.
Oh they can TALK all day about how righteous they are... but their ACTION/INACTION reveal how hideously evil they are.
In any case, I highly doubt anything that the "real BLM" says will change the actions of the fake BLM'ers. Much of the looting and burning is because they're poor, and because of wider racism issues. So anything BLM does would be merely symbolic. So not doing something symbolic makes them evil? Sorry, that's a stretch.