Re: Trade rumours & armchair pipe dreams 19-20 Sponsored by SKYO
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:55 pm
Not enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd
https://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/
Not enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd
Not enough for who?The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:55 pmNot enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd
Just for that....Carlo, Debrusk and a 1st!Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:23 pmNot enough for who?The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 3:55 pmNot enough.....they can throw in Jake Debrusk and a 2nd
Yup those two could be our la kings "simmonds + schenn" for one effective player.
It was sarcasm Doyler. No way you get Carlo for depth pieces
Boston needs offence. They have a lot of depth on D. He’s a second pairing guy there behind Charlie on the right side. I think Gaudette and Virtanen are both capable of scoring 20. That said, if they put Carlo on the market they would probably garner better offers. I wouldn’t trade Boeser for Carlo, that’s for sure. That’s a hefty overpay.The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:22 pmIt was sarcasm Doyler. No way you get Carlo for depth pieces
Hey I'm smokin what yer rollin but Jake and the skinny man dont feel like near enough unless the booins are looking to shed his contract for whatever reason and/or see something I dont in either of those 2 canuck playersDoyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:35 pmBoston needs offence. They have a lot of depth on D. He’s a second pairing guy there behind Charlie on the right side. I think Gaudette and Virtanen are both capable of scoring 20. That said, if they put Carlo on the market they would probably garner better offers. I wouldn’t trade Boeser for Carlo, that’s for sure. That’s a hefty overpay.The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:22 pmIt was sarcasm Doyler. No way you get Carlo for depth pieces
Bingo.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins
I could definitely see a hockey trade. Vancouver has depth up front and they are young guys that should be fairly cheap and we need a D man in the worst way.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins
As much as I agree we need a defenceman upgrade, we need to clear out contracts more. Next year (barring a Cinderella run) is not “year 1“ of contention status. We can’t be considered a contender with 25% of our cap space not spent wisely (for those not doing the math, add Erikkssoon, Sutter, Beagle, Luongo, and Baertschi together and tell me if we have to add Ferlund, Roussel and the Spooner buyout to get there without a debate)Doyle Hargraves wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:22 pmI could definitely see a hockey trade. Vancouver has depth up front and they are young guys that should be fairly cheap and we need a D man in the worst way.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:50 pm Not that I want to engage in the ‘pipe dreams’ part, but if we are moving Gaudette and Jake, it’s because they are part of the deals that move any 3 of the 4 others out. They ain’t going to the Booins
Virtanen is probably going to sign for 2.5 -2.8 so I’m not sure he’d qualify as cheap labour to get out of a shitty contract. Gaudette absolutely though as I can see his deal in that 1.5 million range.m
My ideas were more random thoughts but Boston, Carolina, NYI and NYR all make a bit of sense as trade partners.