Whoever it was that said we should lock up Hughes and Pettersson early and see what we have left to work with before we go signing anyone else this off season has already won this thread as far as I'm concerned.
Micky wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:15 am
Doubt the Canucks are willing to do 6m for 5 or 6 years. Had nothing gone wrong with world health that would have been his approximate
value I think. Maybe 5.8, maybe even 6.5 if others were locked up quickly.
For me, he's worth around 4.8 for three years. He wont do that. Canucks want the two goalie system, We'll see.
Benning isn't going to rush into anything when he doesn't have to just yet.
It seems the Mickster thinks, due to COVID, Marko's value has dropped from $6.5M x 6 years to $4.8M x 3 years.
LOL.. Is that what that said, I don't think so. Lord have mercy..
Richardstroker69 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 2:47 pm
I don’t think your trade proposal was out to lunch, rathbone is super highly rated around the league, similar to fox, and rangers would be very familiar with him.
Curmudgeon wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:43 pm
Nothing against Buchnevich but I have no interest seeing them trade Rathbone. Besides, they really need RHD and another center in the system way more than wingers.
All good points, just saying I'd love some more firepower with some size on the 3rd.
Micky wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:15 am
Doubt the Canucks are willing to do 6m for 5 or 6 years. Had nothing gone wrong with world health that would have been his approximate
value I think. Maybe 5.8, maybe even 6.5 if others were locked up quickly.
For me, he's worth around 4.8 for three years. He wont do that. Canucks want the two goalie system, We'll see.
Benning isn't going to rush into anything when he doesn't have to just yet.
It seems the Mickster thinks, due to COVID, Marko's value has dropped from $6.5M x 6 years to $4.8M x 3 years.
LOL.. Is that what that said
*re-reads it*
YUP, that's exactly what you said you dirty little liar...
Micky wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:55 pm
Lord have mercy..
LOL, Doc...it meant in the shadow, (with a smoke) Strangelove as opposed to the "out in the daylight" one you use to show.
Why you would think anything else is beyond me.
Micky wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 1:35 pm
LOL, Doc...it meant in the shadow, (with a smoke) Strangelove as opposed to the "out in the daylight" one you use to show.
Why you would think anything else is beyond me.
Yeahno, that's not what you meant you dirty little liar!
I don't think so. Lord have mercy.. 
