My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.
............how did you get that picture yesturday?.........
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 10:03 am
by ukcanuck
Topper wrote:
Strangelove wrote:
My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.
............how did you get that picture yesturday?.........
Hollow whiskey bottle theory ?
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 11:50 am
by Strangelove
ukcanuck wrote:
lol I did start watching but its three hours long its going to take a lot of skiving at work to get through it all.
You should watch it, it's the right way to play.
And you should hurry, cuz like if you go back to the first page in this thread you'll see that eventually
... they
... get rid of these kinds of videos.
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 12:03 pm
by Strangelove
ukcanuck wrote:
I don't think you were paying much attention to my video because the "doofus" addresses your theory of "fixing the video images before hand
I don't think you were paying much attention to my response
... because the doofus did not address my theory.
ukcanuck wrote:
He points out that in 1969 it virtually impossible in practical terms to transfer 147 minutes of slow-mo moon walk filmed in a studio on high speed 35 mm film then transfer it to video without all kinds of detectable flaws. He lists them all including a thing called gate weave which is produced by the 35mm film wobbling slightly as it spools through the video lens on the telecine (the machine that transfers film to video). Digital image stabilization can correct this today ( you could probably do it on a mac book) but in 1969 the digital technology did not exist.
Re-read my post.
ukcanuck wrote:
so he does in FACT address the idea of prerecording on film and transferring to video for a "live broadcast"
He does NOT in FACT address the idea satisfactorily.
My theory, which you seemed to have missed, is one idea he didn’t address.
There are others, here is the best rebuttal addressed directly to your dufus Collins:
SUMMARY:
Did NASA have the technology to fake the moon walk videos in 1969? Of course they did! But with the release of a certain video by SG Collins, a large number of deniers have claimed otherwise. This response should set the record straight.
In summary, Collins claims that there were no high speed video cameras in 1969. False. High speed video cameras first came into existence in the early 1960s and the fastest they could shoot at was 60fps.
Collins then says that the Ampex HS-100 magnetic disk recorder, which was used for slow motion instant sports relays, could only store 30 seconds of footage. Irrelevant. You could just as easily feed recordings from videotape into the disk recorder piece by piece and then record its slow motion playback on a second videotape.
And finally, Collins says that shooting on 35mm film and then converting those recordings to videotape would require five (actually six) 1,000 ft magazines, and then a series of cutting, splicing, and transferring. This is true, but also irrelevant. The entire Apollo 11 EVA (if broadcast at 10fps - see below) could fit on a single 2,300 ft magazine of 16mm film - you know, the type of film specifically used for television.
Also unveiled is a new discovery that the Apollo 11 moonwalk was broadcast, not at 10fps as claimed, but more likely at 24fps. This revelation further throws into doubt the official story since it shows the moonwalk was recorded using equipment that reportedly wasn't in their possession when they departed Earth.
So you see, your dufus has his facts wrong and his video is, in essence: gobbledygook.
(equipment that was in their possession when they allegedly departed Earth is dealt with in my 3hr vid)
You know, yours truly goes to great lengths before posting links + quotations.
I do wish people such as yourself wouldn't pollute this thread with gobbledygook.
I mean, why THE FUCK would you choose to accept whatever random dufus Collins has to say as gospel.
Oh yeah, you're that evil-jews-are-controlling-the-world guy, aren't you?
ukcanuck wrote:
As for your position, its been pretty much the same "we did not go to the moon" since before the great migration and at least two conspiracy threads...
I present various ideas for discussion purposes as to degree of possibility.
For example, lately the ideas of Hollow Earth, Concave Hollow Earth, and Expanding Earth have been resurrected.
As I said recently, those theories are not compatible with each other.
I don't accept any theories, only facts.
YOU... have been back and forth on the Moon Landing Hoax theory.
I have encouraged you in the past to open up to the community about these feelings, without fear of mockery
*glares at Rumsfeld*
... just as I would encourage a guy like UDL to open up about his feelings on ghosts/aliens.
(neither of which I personally believe in btw)
I'm here to HELP people.
I'm a HEALER.
Lately I'm Blue because of you.... and Rummy.
*glares at Rumsfeld*
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 12:22 pm
by Strangelove
Topper wrote:
Strangelove wrote:
My toilet bowl looked exactly like that this morning.
............how did you get that picture yesturday?.........
Here's a not-too-shitty theory.
In the future, the Concave Earth Theory becomes the "scientific consensus".
In the future, they discover a way to view everything that has ever happened anywhere in Earth's past.
In the future, folks can do a Google "similar picture" search and send that picture back in time.
In the future some smartass such as yourself was having a little fun.
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2015 12:22 pm
by 2Fingers
Strangelove wrote:
Really makes you wonder how many new people actually want to do that?
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 3:54 pm
by rats19
Hegelian Dialectic ......
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:58 pm
by Strangelove
rats19 wrote:Hegelian Dialectic ......
A logic scheme once upon a time designed to bring freedom to the masses (by using reason to discover Truth)
... now purported by some to have been perverted by... them ... allegedly to strip away freedom.
(strip away freedom whilst providing a false sense of freedom?)
Ironic, ain't it?
Re: Conspiracy Theory
Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 8:06 pm
by rats19
Strangelove wrote:
rats19 wrote:Hegelian Dialectic ......
A logic scheme once upon a time designed to bring freedom to the masses (by using reason to discover Truth)
... now purported by some to have been perverted by... them ... allegedly to strip away freedom.
(strip away freedom whilst providing a false sense of freedom?)
