Re: Canucks News N Notes 25-26
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2026 4:59 pm
Semantics.Mëds wrote: ↑Mon Jan 19, 2026 4:04 pmI think you need a couple of tenured vets in the top-12 and a couple in the top-6.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Jan 19, 2026 2:30 pmYou absolutley can do that.Mëds wrote: ↑Mon Jan 19, 2026 1:45 pmYou can't do that. You need established vets that can lead and show young players how to put in the work. Replacing the in free agency isn't a safe bet because you will be paying through the nose and we will end up with what we ended up with under Benning.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Mon Jan 19, 2026 1:20 pmIf your gonna change the culture, the Chaos Giraffe and longest tenured Canuck have to go.
The sooner the better.
The old adage: Those who can't do teach.
It's true. Players like Myers and Boeser have the know-how to teach, even if they lack the capability to do at times.
Boeser probably just doesn't bring a return in trade that makes sense (I know, I sound like Gillis there lol). If he can morph into a Tyler Toffoli, well that's a good thing for a team of young up and comers.
How many veterans are you saying the team needs?
By tenured I mean with the team. Those vets are usually already on existing contracts, or can be retained on existing deals.
Boeser's contract will not seem terrible in 2 year's time if he morphs into a Toffoli alongside a couple of other young wingers. Also not opposed to it being DeBrusk instead of Brock.
Garland is certainly a play driver of sorts, and his contract will also age well, for the first half at least.
I can see Myers sticking for another 2-3 years on a reasonable deal, and Hronek is already inked long term on a similarly good contract.
Finding guys like that in free agency would cost more, and their commitment to the local team and fans would not be the same.
I think you add a couple of other vets via free agency. A Jay Beagle-type (just don't pay so much for so long), those guys have legendary reputations for professionalism, work ethic, commitment to fitness, preparation, and dedication to their craft.
The following roster has a few of presumptions for next year.....
1. Two Peteys are dealt.
2. Hoglander is dealt
3. We draft McKenna
4. One of Demko or Lankinen are moved
5. DeBrusk or Boeser are traded.....you move whichever one brings the best return.
McKenna - Rossi - Boeser/DeBrusk
Ohgren - Vet - Garland
DOC - Chytil - Karlsson
UFA - Sasson - UFA
Buium - Hronek
Vet - Willander
DPetey - Myers
Demko/Lankinen
Backup
People may raise an eyebrow at Rossi as the 1C.....well he will probably be our most talented pivot once EP40 is moved. Rossi excelled in Minnesota when paired with a speedy, smart winger.....enter McKenna. I also don't think we get a better C than him back in that trade, but we likely can get a 2C that is better than Chytil. Chytil also has some two-way chops, and if he stays healthy is hopefully replaced by Cootes when the former's contract runs its course after next season.
Ohgren is going to move up the depth chart during a rebuild. His efforts have been outstanding, and he's a fucking beast. There's a poor man's Landeskog or speedy Holmstrom in there I think. That style of player could be a great compliment to Garland's whirling, wheeling, dealing, and if you get a decent enough pivot between them, you might be surprised.
Karlsson is the Swedish Alex Burrows. I can see him climbing the lineup over the next two seasons and possibly ending up in the top-6 with the right chemistry.
I've seen enough of M-Pete to know I'd rather turn that page if he's willing to move on. I don't see a guy that screams mentor, I don't see a guy with anything more than #6 stick and puck skills, I don't see an above average PK'er, and there's no offense there what-so-ever. Even during a rebuild $5.5M (see I got it right this time JPP) is too much to stash on the bottom pairing when the same can be had for $3M.
Which part was semantics?Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:19 am Semantics.
I want to see the team dump Myers.
You want to see the team dump their best center.
Your entire post. I was saying flush everyone except a couple vets, you said flush everyone except a couple different vets.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:36 pmWhich part was semantics?Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:19 am Semantics.
I want to see the team dump Myers.
You want to see the team dump their best center.
No. I said keep certain vets and you said that the guys I wanted to keep needed to go to change the culture.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:37 pmYour entire post. I was saying flush everyone except a couple vets, you said flush everyone except a couple different vets.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:36 pmWhich part was semantics?Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:19 am Semantics.
I want to see the team dump Myers.
You want to see the team dump their best center.
We are both looking at 4-5 years from now.
I agree with Garland and Hronek and the Brock/Debrusk flips.. but Myers is too old.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:26 pmNo. I said keep certain vets and you said that the guys I wanted to keep needed to go to change the culture.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:37 pmYour entire post. I was saying flush everyone except a couple vets, you said flush everyone except a couple different vets.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:36 pmWhich part was semantics?Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:19 am Semantics.
I want to see the team dump Myers.
You want to see the team dump their best center.
We are both looking at 4-5 years from now.
Brock may be interchangeable with DeBrusk, but Garland, Myers, and Hronek, are guys that will provide a stronger culture than any of the existing ones.
None of those guys have to be here for the entire rebuild. In fact, the only one that I actually see remaining and being part of the competitive window would be Hronek and Boeser. The latter only providing he can morph into a Toffoli-type. And both of them will be 34-35 at that point.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 7:53 pmI agree with Garland and Hronek and the Brock/Debrusk flips.. but Myers is too old.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:26 pmNo. I said keep certain vets and you said that the guys I wanted to keep needed to go to change the culture.Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 1:37 pmYour entire post. I was saying flush everyone except a couple vets, you said flush everyone except a couple different vets.Mëds wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:36 pmWhich part was semantics?Madcombinepilot wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 5:19 am Semantics.
I want to see the team dump Myers.
You want to see the team dump their best center.
We are both looking at 4-5 years from now.
Brock may be interchangeable with DeBrusk, but Garland, Myers, and Hronek, are guys that will provide a stronger culture than any of the existing ones.
And where will Myers be in 2031?
This.Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Wed Jan 21, 2026 3:03 am Myers is on the last year of his contract next season with 12 team no trade protection. He is a minus 22 - second worst on the team after Brock. Compared to the other veteran D (Meaty -5 and Hronek 0) he’s not doing well and has no growth upside. He is blocking Mancini from getting NHL experience. At 35 they should not be resigning him as part of the rebuild, so he should be trade bait. If he doesn’t want to waive and go to a contender before this TDL and play a depth role to try to win a cup somewhere, he should be traded this summer, at the very latest next TDL if he has any value left. Whatever the case, Myers is not part of this rebuild and he’s on the clock, nice guy, but on the clock.