CanucksCorner.com Forums

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:11 pm When did Sutter average 38 points a season ? Over what time frame ? Please provide reference

YOU were talking about points per game/career. (scroll up, you were very clear about that)

I merely responded.

Sutter has .38 points per game/career.

Backlund has .50 points per game/career.


HERE, learn to read your own posts:

Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:07 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:50 pm

Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:39 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:37 pm Backlund blew away Sutter in ppg over his career

Lol you can’t see 50 points a season is better than 33.

It's 38, not 33.

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:12 pm

Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:08 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 2:53 pm Two idiots that either can’t read or are just determined to troll the fuck out of the place

I applaud you for taking that first step.

Your turn Nucklehead.

Yeah no.... the idiots have been you and your pony Dud.

... said the idiot.

Strangelove wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:15 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:11 pm When did Sutter average 38 points a season ? Over what time frame ? Please provide reference

YOU were talking about points per game/career. (scroll up, you were very clear about that)

I merely responded.

Sutter has .38 points per game/career.

Backlund has .50 points per game/career.

It was ppg per 82 games Numbnutz. Learn to read Mod/Troll

41-31 over the career for Backlund and 50-33 over a recent three year sample size. Big gap got bigger just like the airspace in your dome.

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:20 pm It was ppg per 82 games Numbnutz. Learn to read Mod/Troll

UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

... YOU SAID ppg over his career.

Learn to read YOUR OWN POSTS... "Numbnutz".

BTW "ppg per 82 games"... is the same thing as... "ppg over his career"

... unless you're talking about just one particular season??

But you didn't mention one particular season...

No idea what you're TRYING TO SAY... hey, I can only respond to what you DO say.

Sober up good buddy...

Is 50 points over 82 games better than 33 points over 82 games ?

Is 41 points a year better than 31 points a year ?

Which ones are better numbers ?

[quote=Strangelove post_id=298490 time=1518909866

No idea what you're TRYING TO SAY
[/quote]

Yeah I understand. This is why you can’t grasp it.

Doctor.....lol more like a Rug Doctor

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:30 pm Is 50 points over 82 games better than 33 points over 82 games ?

Is 41 points a year better than 31 points a year ?

Which ones are better numbers ?

You clearly stated ppg over their careers.

Now you are trying to move the goalposts (somewhere, anywhere) ??

Or you're just drunk.

Either way, NOT going to encourage that kind of behavior.

Here, towards the bottom they have NHL ppg over their careers:

http://forecaster.thehockeynews.com/player/6053/stats

http://forecaster.thehockeynews.com/player/6417/stats

ppg over their careers YOUR WORDS.

Meaning you got one of numbers wrong.

Enter Strangelove with the correction.

How many fingers am I holding up?

You win

I’m out

You guys have done your level best to turn this place into a dump. Mission accomplished

Oh you're a mean drunk Blobby...

0.38 ppg works out to 31 points per 82 game season.

0.50 ppg works out to 41 points per 82 game season.

It's exactly what Blobcat said.....

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Is 50 points over 82 games better than 33 points over 82 games ?

Is 41 points a year better than 31 points a year ?

Which ones are better numbers ?

I'm not sure what the argument is here. Unless Strangelove is simply trolling moderating because a guy forgot to put decimal points in front of a pair of numbers?

Either way.....

I will take Sutter in a bottom-6 role at $4.35M x 5 years over Backlund at $5.35M x 6 years in a similar role.

Sutter will win more faceoffs and play more minutes while contributing fewer points, but hopefully that extra million in cap space can be put towards someone who plays in the top-6 and more than makes up for those 10 points from a checking center.....hopefully.

Both players are overpaid by at least $500K considering what they bring to their respective teams on the ice.

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 9:04 amAgain, when in doubt make shit up. It’s what you do best

Mëds wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:04 pm 0.38 ppg works out to 31 points per 82 game season.

0.50 ppg works out to 41 points per 82 game season.

THANK YOU

Not sure why he didn't just stick to his ppg over their careers though.

Less confusing no?

And he did it without explanation.

And then he switched to ppg per 82 games... when he should have said "points per 82 games".

(he was attempting to clarify but failed miserably)

(I just now figured out that "points per 82 games"... is what he must have meant)

But none of this explains the original mix up.

Here's where it started...

I laughed at him for saying "Backlund blew away Sutter in ppg over his career".

He responded with "Lol you can’t see 50 points a season is better than 33".

That made ZERO sense... considering he was talking about ppg over their careers

(did anyone understand what he meant by the numbers 50 and 33 at that point in time??)

So I assumed he was referring to Backlund/Sutter's career ppg numbers of .50 and .38

... and that he got the last number wrong (hence my correction).

NEAR THE END Blob threw in something about "over a recent three year sample size".

But that was too little too late... the damage to the conversation was already done.

He should have said "over a recent three year sample size" from the start... if that's what he meant.

He didn't... but he did say ppg over their careers repeatedly during the convo.

A sober Blob is capable of communicating better than this...

My good friend Blob thinks I'm trolling him when fact I'm trying to stop him from becoming a Flames fan.

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:34 pm Doctor.....lol more like a Rug Doctor

Gonna have to disagree with you there, Blob. Pretty sure the "Doctor" reference in Strange's handle is with respect to the study of red herrings (rather than a movie reference).

Notwithstanding the semantics or whether or not Blob indulged in some libations, .50 is substantially better than .38, particularly when considering the spread is over a career. I will readily admit that I don't watch enough flames hockey to be able to comment on whether the other facets of their respective games makes Sutter or Backlund the better buy.

DonCherry4PM wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:29 pm

Blob Mckenzie wrote: ↑Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:34 pm Doctor.....lol more like a Rug Doctor

Gonna have to disagree with you there, Blob. Pretty sure the "Doctor" reference in Strange's handle is with respect to the study of red herrings (rather than a movie reference).

Notwithstanding the semantics or whether or not Blob indulged in some libations, .50 is substantially better than .38, particularly when considering the spread is over a career. I will readily admit that I don't watch enough flames hockey to be able to comment on whether the other facets of their respective games makes Sutter or Backlund the better buy.

And Backlund (same age as Sutter) will earn $1 million more a year than Sutter, on a 6 year contract extension 3 years longer than what's left on Sutters contract.

Let's either stop ragging on about Sutters contract or let's call the Backlund 6 year extension awful. Make up your minds