CanucksCorner.com Forums

When a Kadri hits, Big Tuna should just avoid trolling.

Let's see; How long did the Leaf's rebuild take?
Well they had a captain that was willing to play with a broken leg, when needed.
They had a D-man that hadn't even invented our freakin donuts yet.

Think that adds up to about 50 years. Not bad, I guess. They're about half way home.

Think I heard it was a 100 year dietary supplement plan; TUNA SALAD.

Blob Mckenzie wrote:Depends how much I've had to drink.

PC cops are out in full force.

Have you tried Depends? Does its job no matter how fucked up you get.

micky107 wrote:Let's see; How long did the Leaf's rebuild take?
Well they had a captain that was willing to play with a broken leg, when needed.
They had a D-man that hadn't even invented our freakin donuts yet.

Think that adds up to about 50 years. Not bad, I guess. They're about half way home.

Think I heard it was a 100 year dietary supplement plan; TUNA SALAD.

Less than 2 years since Shanaplan began.

BigTuna wrote:

micky107 wrote:Let's see; How long did the Leaf's rebuild take?
Well they had a captain that was willing to play with a broken leg, when needed.
They had a D-man that hadn't even invented our freakin donuts yet.

Think that adds up to about 50 years. Not bad, I guess. They're about half way home.

Think I heard it was a 100 year dietary supplement plan; TUNA SALAD.

Less than 2 years since Shanaplan began.

The team has still been dogshit for a dozen years though.

Blob Mckenzie wrote:

BigTuna wrote:

micky107 wrote:Let's see; How long did the Leaf's rebuild take?
Well they had a captain that was willing to play with a broken leg, when needed.
They had a D-man that hadn't even invented our freakin donuts yet.

Think that adds up to about 50 years. Not bad, I guess. They're about half way home.

Think I heard it was a 100 year dietary supplement plan; TUNA SALAD.

Less than 2 years since Shanaplan began.

The team has still been dogshit for a dozen years though.

There was clearly no rebuild. It would be like me saying Vancouver's rebuild has started.

Ah Tuna you just don't get it.

People hate TO more than Vancouver.

Also yes your team for past 50 years really has sucked except for a few brief playoff appearances.

Reefer2 wrote:Ah Tuna you just don't get it.

People hate TO more than Vancouver.

Also yes your team for past 50 years really has sucked except for a few brief playoff appearances.

Says the fanbase with no Stanley cups.

BigTuna wrote:

Reefer2 wrote: Also yes your team for past 50 years really has sucked except for a few brief playoff appearances.

Says the fanbase with no Stanley cups.

Only the senior citizen section of your fan base were cheering the Leaves the last time they won a Cup.

Pretty easy to win the Cup when there were only 6 NHL teams!

I'll have you know Donlever and Damon were around when the Vancouver Millionaires won the Stanley Cup.

BigTuna wrote:

Reefer2 wrote:Ah Tuna you just don't get it.

People hate TO more than Vancouver.

Also yes your team for past 50 years really has sucked except for a few brief playoff appearances.

Says the fanbase with no Stanley cups.

Says the fan base of a team that win most of their cups when there was only 6 teams in the league.

BigTuna wrote:

Reefer2 wrote:Ah Tuna you just don't get it.

People hate TO more than Vancouver.

Also yes your team for past 50 years really has sucked except for a few brief playoff appearances.

Says the fanbase with no Stanley cups.

The Apollo program, Montreal Expo, John McCain gets shot down, Che Guevara dies and Pink Floyd is born.

What a glorious year, eh Tuna?

Reefer2 wrote:

BigTuna wrote:

Reefer2 wrote:Ah Tuna you just don't get it.

People hate TO more than Vancouver.

Also yes your team for past 50 years really has sucked except for a few brief playoff appearances.

Says the fanbase with no Stanley cups.

Says the fan base of a team that win most of their cups when there was only 6 teams in the league.

All of their cups!!

I'm one of those old farts, proudly a leaves fan, before I found Nirvana, that cheered for and remembers the 1967 Cup win. But not old enough to remember Vancouver winning their Cup. A win that gets conviently forgotten about when trolls have a point to make.

Let's be fair. No Cup win before expansion should count. Or all Cup wins count. Simple. In scenario one, leaves have won the same number of Cups as we have. Sadly, in scenario two they are still the 2nd most winningest franchises of all time.

But since 1967, we are a better franchise, when one looks at the entire body of work. Sadly it says little about either franchise. We both suck.

Hockey Widow wrote: I'm one of those old farts, proudly a leaves fan, before I found Nirvana, that cheered for and remembers the 1967 Cup win. But not old enough to remember Vancouver winning their Cup. A win that gets conviently forgotten about when trolls have a point to make.

Let's be fair. No Cup win before expansion should count. Or all Cup wins count. Simple. In scenario one, leaves have won the same number of Cups as we have. Sadly, in scenario two they are still the 2nd most winningest franchises of all time.

But since 1967, we are a better franchise, when one looks at the entire body of work. Sadly it says little about either franchise. We both suck.

While we have not won a cup in our 46 years, we have made the finals 3 times. Only 2 out of 30 teams make the finals every year, so we are right about average for appearances in the big show. We really don't suck as hard as we think we do, especially if you take out the years of 70-74, 84-91, 97-99 and right now.

I guess I'm winning the bet...

Ya think Phoenix would like a re-do at the draft? Take Marner instead of that bum who can't skate - Strome? Marner looks like the next Patrick Kane