Page 2 of 3
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:13 pm
by Meds
Topper wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:41 pm
Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:38 pm
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:17 pm
Clearly a sock. Not even trying to hide it.
Not a sock.
Welcome Mr. G.
Well darn then

Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:14 pm
by donlever
Strangelove wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:01 pm
I write each name down on a piece of paper and put them in a wooden box.
Lota-tot-tot
You'd save me a good deal of trouble if you pulled my name.
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:16 pm
by Meds
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:17 pm
Clearly a sock. Not even trying to hide it.
Oh obviously. The structure of the post, the lack of any spacing between lines. The half sentences.
We've seen that before.
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:17 pm
by Carl Yagro
Nobody wants you to win the Lottery, Leves.
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:19 pm
by donlever
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:17 pm
Nobody wants you to win the Lottery, Leves.
Sarcasm?
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:20 pm
by Carl Yagro
Do you see a winkie?
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:20 pm
by Topper
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:17 pm
Nobody wants you to win the Lottery, Leves.
Well darn then
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:21 pm
by Carl Yagro
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:25 pm
by Strangelove
Mëds wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:16 pm
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:17 pm
Clearly a sock. Not even trying to hide it.
Oh obviously. The structure of the post, the lack of any spacing between lines. The half sentences.
Well done Sherlock!
Again: Not a sock.
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:32 pm
by donlever
Carl Yagro wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:20 pm
Do you see a winkie?
No.
But.
I know two fat Kiwi sluts who saw a little one back in the day.
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:38 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
I'm a grower not a shower dammit!
Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:55 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
MrG9002! wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:06 pm
Demko is done. If you can't play at 100% the NHL isn't for you.
Lankinnen should be the Canucks No.1 goalie. Trade Demko for a backup goalie or bring up a young up and comer. Personally I'd be for bringing up a new kid with energy, and eagerness to prove what he's got.
Silov played well during the playoffs but has lost the touch.
Demko and Silov are liabilities....next!!
Welcome brothaman.
I believe you speak with the Poplideus of Wisdom

Re: Lankinnen No.1
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:04 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
This thread will be the venue for gazing into the poplideus of 2025

Re: Lankinen No.1
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:17 pm
by MrG9002!
Now I learned how to spell Lankinen. HA!
What's a sock?
The only acronym i know for sock is some guy who marries a single Mom with kids.
"How many socks ya got Bill?"
"Socks?"
"Yeah, Some other c%$ts kids"
Should there be a space between each line to make it clearer that when a person says, Lankinen should be our No.1 goalie it means they like his play.
I'm pretty sure a period signifies the end of a sentence in English.
Re: Lankinen No.1
Posted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:56 pm
by Megaterio Llamas
MrG9002! wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:17 pm
Now I learned how to spell Lankinen. HA!
What's a sock?
The only acronym i know for sock is some guy who marries a single Mom with kids.
"How many socks ya got Bill?"
"Socks?"
"Yeah, Some other c%$ts kids"
Should there be a space between each line to make it clearer that when a person says, Lankinen should be our No.1 goalie it means they like his play.
I'm pretty sure a period signifies the end of a sentence in English.
He has come in here and really saved our bacon, his play has been absolutely stellar. I'm with you MrG and I've been thinking this way for a bit now.
And the thing is, you need your starter to play more than 20 games a year. If these guys don't get this done then they deserve what they get as far as I'm concerned.