US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond

[Topper]

Here's why she didn't show up to concede on election night...
Ahhhhhhhh

... that's a shame.

While the news is dubious........Just another overly emotional woman cracking under pressure of heartbreak. So fragile, even glass ceilings keep them pinned down.

Good thing she didn't have the nuclear codes.

[Topper]

Kevin Allred @KevinAllred
now more than ever it's important to fight back, make your voices heard, push for change in WHATEVER way you can. cuz Trump wants us silent.

Kevin Allred @KevinAllred
i should also say: tomorrow on Rutgers New Brunswick campus - a walk out/march starts at 3 pm. Voorhees Mall on College Ave. BE THERE.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/16/ru ... reats.html

Kevin Allred, a professor at Rutgers who created a “politicizing Beyonce” course was reportedly taken to a New York City hospital’s psych ward Tuesday night for political statements he made “on campus and on Twitter.”

The NYPD told the paper that campus police said Allred “made threats to kill white people and he was subsequently taken to Bellevue Hospital for evaluation.”

Today on... Spot the Looney.

Not too different from Hillary's comments yesterday.

This is the Dems giant middle finger to President_Elect_Donald_J_Trump. You are now President Elect, here is your first domestic policy crisis, deal with it.

She may owe him nothing, but it is occurring on Obama's watch.......oh, he's touring his safe European Home.

[2Fingers]

Here's why she didn't show up to concede on election night...
Ahhhhhhhh

... that's a shame.

While the news is dubious........Just another overly emotional woman cracking under pressure of heartbreak. So fragile, even glass ceilings keep them pinned down.

Good thing she didn't have the nuclear codes.

I'm really disappointed if you even believe in half the stuff you say or link too.

[griz]

Getting back to the topic of the Anthropogenic climate change hoax ...

http://www.infowars.com/climate-report- ... un-summit/

Trump has been revealing the hoax and now he's POTUS. Interesting times we live in.

https://www.cfact.org/wp-content/upload ... Report.pdf

[Strangelove]

Here's why she didn't show up to concede on election night...
Ahhhhhhhh

... that's a shame.

While the news is dubious........Just another overly emotional woman cracking under pressure of heartbreak. So fragile, even glass ceilings keep them pinned down.

Good thing she didn't have the nuclear codes.

I'm really disappointed if you even believe in half the stuff you say or link too.

Hillary is a wicked witch, a which ole witch, a wicked witch, this is well documented, for example:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... foul-mouth

Hillary Clinton’s “treatment of DS [Department of State] agents on her protective detail was so contemptuous that many of them sought reassignment or employment elsewhere,” according to a just-released summary of an FBI interview with a former State Department official. “Prior to CLINTON’s tenure, being an agent on the Secretary of State’s protective detail was seen as an honor and privilege reserved for senior agents. However, by the end of CLINTON’s tenure, it was staffed largely with new agents because it was difficult to find senior agents willing to work for her.”

Clinton’s State Department agents are hardly the first to complain about her bullying.

“She derives pleasure from lording over other people who cannot do anything about it and who are less powerful than she is,” author Ronald Kessler told Newsmax TV’s J. D. Hayworth. In fact, Clinton’s well-documented history of profane, unhinged outbursts against those who work for her spans decades.

“Stay the fuck back, stay the fuck away from me!” the then-–First Lady screamed at her Secret Service agents. “Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just fucking do as I say, okay!!?” Clinton demanded, according to former FBI agent Gary Aldrich’s Unlimited Access, page 139

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your fucking ass over here and grab those bags!” Hillary yelled at a Secret Service agent, as Joyce Milton reported in The First Partner, page 259. The officer explained in vain that he preferred to keep his hands free, in case a threat arose.

“Good morning, ma’am,” a uniformed Secret Service officer once greeted Hillary Clinton.

“Fuck off!” she replied, as Ronald Kessler documented in First Family Detail, page 16.

“Put this back on the ground!” Hillary Clinton screamed at the pilot of presidential helicopter Marine One. “I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need my sunglasses! We need to go back!” Clinton so abused the chopper’s crew that they christened it Broomstick One.

Also in Dereliction of Duty, its author — Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Robert “Buzz” Patterson (Ret.), who carried the “nuclear football” — recalled hearing “volleys of expletives” erupting from Hillary’s mouth. He also lamented “the Nazi-like edge that emerged when she was around.”

“Where is the goddam fucking flag? I want the goddam fucking flag up every fucking morning at fucking sunrise,” Hillary snapped at state trooper Larry Patterson at the Arkansas governor’s mansion on Labor Day 1991, according to Ronald Kessler’s Inside the White House, page 246.

“Good morning,” an Arkansas state trooper said to Clinton, according to American Evita, by Christopher Andersen, a former contributing editor with Time magazine.

“Fuck off!” Hillary told him and his fellow bodyguards. “It’s enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day! I’m not going to talk to you, too! Just do your goddam job and keep your mouth shut.”

If this is how Hillary Clinton handles those who have stood ready to take bullets for her, how would she treat 325 million everyday Americans?

Deal with it Reef, books have been written, don't shoot the messenger, she's a mean drunk...

[2Fingers]

But how good is she in bed?

[Per]

Hillary winning the popular vote by more than a million.

The people choose Hillary.
The electoral college choose Trump.

http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/president

[Per]

Or, in a sense, the people chose none of the above.

Looking at eligible voters, Hillary got just over 27% and Donald just under 27%.
Way over 40% didn't even fricking vote.

If any of those complain about the result - f*ck'em!

[Topper]

Hillary winning the popular vote by more than a million.

The people choose Hillary.
The electoral college choose Trump.

http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/president

Proportional voting

[griz]

http://usherald.com/heres-proof-hillary ... dia-lying/

The leftist media moguls are trying to trick the American people into thinking that this election was some sort of sham. John Adams said, "There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide," and that's why our founding fathers set up a democratic republic and not an all out democracy.

Now liberals are calling for the destruction of the electoral college and the establishment of a straight democracy, because it works better for them at the time. You can bet that if the results had flipped, you wouldn't hear the left demanding that we rewrite out entire political system. It's just another example of the left throwing a fit when things didn't go their way, but it's our job to put out the truth and protect our political system and the results that it has created.

[Topper]

Just as liberals and lefties in Canada wish to meddle in the electoral system to make it easier for themselves.

[Per]

http://usherald.com/heres-proof-hillary ... dia-lying/

The leftist media moguls are trying to trick the American people into thinking that this election was some sort of sham. John Adams said, "There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide," and that's why our founding fathers set up a democratic republic and not an all out democracy.

Now liberals are calling for the destruction of the electoral college and the establishment of a straight democracy, because it works better for them at the time. You can bet that if the results had flipped, you wouldn't hear the left demanding that we rewrite out entire political system. It's just another example of the left throwing a fit when things didn't go their way, but it's our job to put out the truth and protect our political system and the results that it has created.

Another very sketchy "news" site, with an article that is an outright lie.
First of all, it's not "the media" that counts the vote, they just report it.
Secondly, absentee votes are of course counted.
Thirdly, all serious sites confirm that albeit all votes have not been counted yet, Clinton's lead in the popular vote will almost certainly keep growing, as most of the districts that have not been finished yet overwhelmingly lean democrat.

Many absentee ballots are cast by voters who are unable to vote at their physical polling place due to being an active duty military member, a family member of someone on active duty or a U.S. citizen residing overseas. All ballots submitted according to State laws are counted in every election.

The media often will report the projected outcome of the election before all of the ballots are counted. In a close election, the media may report that the outcome cannot be announced until after the absentee ballots are counted. However, all ballots, including absentee ballots, are counted in the final totals for every election - and every vote (absentee or in-person) counts the same.

https://www.fvap.gov/vao/vag/appendix/faq

Are absentee ballots counted?

Yes, all votes are counted, whether they're cast in-person or by absentee ballot.

It is a common misconception that absentee ballots are only counted during very tight races. This misconception stems from two things: one, absentee ballots are often counted for days after the election since many are coming from abroad; two, absentee ballots are often a small percentage of all voted ballots. Many elections have a clear winner, so the absentee ballots that are still being counted after election night don't affect the results as predicted right after the polls close. As absentee voting becomes more popular, however, an increasing number of elections are decided by absentee ballots.

http://help.vote.org/article/8-are-abse ... ts-counted
http://www.snopes.com/2016/11/13/who-wo ... ular-vote/

[griz]

Another very sketchy "news" site

... and you trust CNN?

The historical breakout for absentee ballots is about 67-33% Republican," explains American Thinker. Furthermore, American Thinker says it is much more likely that those votes are for Trump and not Hillary.

[Per]

Yup. It's a real news network with real reporters who have a degree in journalism and who know they may end up in court if they start telling outright lies. All journalism may be somewhat slanted; CNN may lean a bit more to the left, Fox will lean a lot more to the right, but I trust either of them way beyond some crummy alt right site that may not be more than a 300 pound unemployed guy sitting in his parents' basement with a computer spewing his hatred against "the establishment".

Seriously, griz. You need to start discerning a bit more on the credibility of sources.
Most colleges offer courses that teach some basic guidelines that you can use.
I recommend that you look into it, before you find yourself the victim of a Nigeria letter scam.

And when it comes to something like that absurd statement that absentee votes aren't counted... wow... having counted votes several times myself,albeit in Swedish and European elections, that thought is mind boggling... Anyway, it doesn't take much googling to find out the actual rules and guidelines, and conclude that that article is pure bullshit. Seriously. You need to do your homework. You cannot believe anything and everything you read on the internet. A lot of that shit is bogus, fake, outright lies, clickbait.
Real news organisations - newspapers, magazines, TV networks - on the other hand, are held accountable to a much higher degree. Sure, you must not believe everything they say either, but if they are caught lying, they get punished, so they are more likely to be close to the truth than those 300 pound babies, like Alex Jones.

And, furthermore, if eg CNN and Fox say the same thing, then it is almost certain that it is true.
Especially if you can confirm it with eg BBC, der Spiegel or some other trustworthy site outside the USA.

[Cornuck]

And, furthermore, if eg CNN and Fox say the same thing, then it is almost certain that it is true.
Especially if you can confirm it with eg BBC, der Spiegel or some other trustworthy site outside the USA.

You mean something like when "USHerald.com" links to their source "MadWorldNews.com" ? That's all the proof griz needs, and it should be good enough for you too!