Page 9 of 10
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:07 pm
by Nuckertuzzi
Stankoven scored 3 G’s.
Chatfield looking like a solid top 4.
Guenther just scored his 2nd G for 4th point.
Thank you JB.
Dickinson scored 2 G’s.
Podkolzin just scored his 1st G for 4th point.
Thank you JR.
Playoffs highlighting tag team of incompetence.
TFG’s

Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 8:10 pm
by Cousin Strawberry
Where's that aquiloonie on the phone meme
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:20 pm
by Meds
Evan Bouchard, the $10.5M gift that keeps on giving.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:17 am
by JelloPuddingPop
Mëds wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:20 pm
Evan Bouchard, the $10.5M gift that keeps on giving.
I think 10.5M is a fair contract for a 95 point, 26 year old right shot defender.
They just need to insulate him a bit better. Edm as a whole has been playing trash hockey so far in the playoffs.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:26 am
by donlever
He also has 83 points in 78 playoff games.
Bouch is another Mëds jihad.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:45 am
by Meds
donlever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:26 am
He also has 83 points in 78 playoff games.
Bouch is another Mëds jihad.
No jihad at all. I want Edmonton to lose and he is helping with that. Lol.
He’s a point producer, but for a defenseman of that salary, way too many of his mistakes end up in his net.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:59 am
by donlever
So you keep bringing up and saying...
Hence.
Jihad.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 10:05 am
by theman
Every day the oil lose is a glorious day.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:37 am
by Tciso
If you want to insulate Bouch, and his defensive liability, you need a shutout down line, and a few other dmen who understand defense. And a goalie. Anaheim is too deep for Edmonton. I hope it ends in 5.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:39 am
by Meds
donlever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:59 am
So you keep bringing up and saying...
Hence.
Jihad.
Nah.
No Bouchard jihad here.
An Oilers jihad? Certainly.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:41 am
by Tciso
donlever wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 9:59 am
So you keep bringing up and saying...
Hence.
Jihad.
Jihad would mean converting their players and fans to become Canucks, and putting the infidels that do not convert to death. Followed by burning their city and salting the earth their stadium once stood.
Wishing them to lose is so far from jihad. Both sound fun.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:44 am
by Tciso
theman wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 10:05 am
Every day the oil lose is a glorious day.
Its poetic if you say it in a Christopher Walken voice.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:44 am
by Meds
Tciso wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:37 am
If you want to insulate Bouch, and his defensive liability, you need a shutout down line, and a few other dmen who understand defense. And a goalie. Anaheim is too deep for Edmonton. I hope it ends in 5.
Who said anything about insulating Bouchard?
I don’t think any player making 8 figures should require insulating. If he does then you should be shifting your sights to the GM who signed that contract.
I get paying for offensive production in a forward, but in a defenseman who accumulates nearly half of his points via secondary helpers while playing with McDavid and Draisaitl?
Right now I am loving the $20M cap hole that is Edmonton’s highest paid blueliners.
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:45 am
by Meds
Tciso wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:44 am
theman wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2026 10:05 am
Every day the oil lose is a glorious day.
Its poetic if you say it in a Christopher Walken voice.
Isn’t everything though?
Re: 2025-26 OOTS: Playoffs Edition
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 11:45 am
by donlever
With Jello foe'd you are missing parts of the conversation.
So yeah...Jello said it.