The Brown Wizard wrote: ↑Sun May 03, 2020 4:12 pm
Herd immunity as a solution is still being debated Per.
It has gotten a bad rep, in that some feel it is a resignatrd stance, but unless we get herd immunity we need to stay in lookdown indefinitely. Whether it is acquired from infections or vaccines, herd immunity is the only thing that can allow us to go back to normal life.
Also, fiddling numbers/cherry picking statistics to justify the absurdly high death rate is a rediculous defense.
Actually, I am protesting that most countries fiddle with numbers. But even so, you can hardly call Sweden’s numbers absurdly high. If we disregard that afaik only Belgium and Sweden include all deaths of people showing corona-like symptoms and just compare the official numbers across the board, here’s a look at the current official corona deaths per million population:
Belgium - - - - 677
Spain - - - - - - 540
Italy - - - - - - 478
UK - - - -- - - - 419
France - - - - - 381
Netherlands - 295
Sweden - - - - 265
Ireland - - - - 264
USA - - - - - - 207
Switzerland - 204
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
The USA as a whole has only 207 so far, but large parts of the midwest, south and west coast have not really been affected yet.
Looking at individual states you find these numbers:
New York - - - - - - - 1256
New Jersey - - - - - - 888
Connecticut - - - - - 697
Massachusetts - - - - 586
Louisiana - - - - - - - 431
Michigan - - - - - - - 407
District of Columbia 386
Rhode Island - - - - - 303
Pennsylvania - - - - - 221
Maryland - - - - -- - - 213
Illinois - - - - - - - - - 204
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
As you see there are plenty of places where the death toll has passed 200/million, so whereas Sweden’s numbers are higher than in the other Nordic countries they are neither exceptional nor absurd. Tragic, sure, but that is only what should be expected from a pandemic.
Sweden perplexingly chose their own unconventional path which was to sacrifice the weak due to the country lacking the liquid resources to bankroll their citizens into staying home.
Seriously?
Check out the national debt to GDP ratio:
USA 106.7
France 99.2
Canada 88.01
UK 85.67
Finland 59.98
Germany 56.93
China 55.36
Switzerland 39.49
Sweden 37.23
https://worldpopulationreview.com/count ... onal-debt/
As you can see the fiscal conservatism of Swedish governments has left us with ample navigation room for this crisis. Our finances, prior to this pandemic, are in great shape. However, rather than bankrollong people staying home we have prioritized to bankroll people staying employed.
Companies do not have to pay their employer fees for March through May and have also the possibility to postpone paying taxes till next year. Businesses that stand still can send home staff and the govt will pay 80% of the salary. Companies that have lost more than 30% of turnover compared to last year can get government grants to survive this crisis.
Oh, but there is some incentive to staying home too, people can get up to three weeks sick leave with 80% of their salary without seeing a doctor. Normally you need to see a doctor after the first week.
I was reading an interview with an exasperated epidemiologist from Gothenburg who was not holding back in his condemnation of your countries' covid response policy. Your experts are most certainly not united in support of it whatsoever and the proof is in the body count.
Absolutely. Since we have not had a pandemic like this since the Spanish flu, there is no real blueprint for what to do, and of course there are a lot of opinions. Especially since most other countries have chosen a different path. Yet polls show roughly two thirds of Swedes trusting in the policy suggested by the Swedish Public Health Agency.
The body count is however far too early to evaluate. There will be time for that in 2022 or 2023 when this hopefully should be over.
My wife lost her grandfather today to it. It is certainly taking it toll in Sweden and i find it bizarre that you are so voraciously defending this.
My heartfelt condolences.
This whole thing truly sucks, and it’s always tragic to lose a loved one.
The one area where Sweden has truly failed is in keeping the nursing homes safe. The municipalities and private companies that run them have not done a good job in ensuring availability of PPE for their staff and not tested them in the way that hospitals do. They are also often poorly trained in how to prevent spread of disease. Almost half of those that have died so far are elderly living in nursing homes, and half the nursing homes in the Stockholm area have been afflicted.
I find it absurd thiugh that every one seems to be piling on Sweden and attacking us. No one knows what the best strategy is. This has never happened before in modern history, and there is little to learn from pandemics in earlier times when both society and health care was very different. We have chosen a
slightly different approach than most. Not very different. The main difference is that we have guidelines rather than rules or legislation, but we are encouraged to work from home, practice social distancing, wash our hands incessantly and avoid travelling. Gatherings of more than 50 people are banned. Another difference is that the politicians have mainly stayed out of this and left the decisions to the agency in charge of public health. Thus not so much political posturing and grandstanding and a need to show yourself as and on top of this.
But somehow this has invoked ire in lots of people elsewhere. Wtf? What gives? We’re doing the best we can.
Time will tell if this was the right strategy or not, but at present it is too early to tell.
We’re barely three months into What will most likely be a two year pandemic.
The real disaster will be when it hits the slums of Africa and Latin America.
They’re already digging mass graves in Manaus in the Amazon rain forest.