The Great Jim Benning Debate! (And personal insult thread)

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Locked
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10281
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:04 pm
Reefer2 wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:00 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:53 pm What are you going on about Reef?
RD said we have good young D, I said we have Hughes for sure but after that it is unknown who will make it. So to say that the team is set for D is asinine.
He thinks all of the other prospects will pan out and that Tryamkin will come back
Would that be like thinking a forward drafted in the first round of the 2019 draft will pan out, replacing a panned out Boeser (traded for a top 4 D-man)?
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8072
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

RoyalDude wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 4:13 pm
Would that be like thinking a forward drafted in the first round of the 2019 draft will pan out, replacing a panned out Boeser (traded for a top 4 D-man)?
Ya but you have to admit it makes sense to deal from our strength to try and reinforce our darkest weakness?
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

RoyalDude wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 4:13 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:04 pm
Reefer2 wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:00 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:53 pm What are you going on about Reef?
RD said we have good young D, I said we have Hughes for sure but after that it is unknown who will make it. So to say that the team is set for D is asinine.
He thinks all of the other prospects will pan out and that Tryamkin will come back
Would that be like thinking a forward drafted in the first round of the 2019 draft will pan out, replacing a panned out Boeser (traded for a top 4 D-man)?
Considering it will be a likely top 5 pickn in a great draft I’d say yes. The chances of forwards turning out seem to be greater than D men
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

RoyalDude wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 4:13 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:04 pm
Reefer2 wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 2:00 pm
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sat Nov 24, 2018 1:53 pm What are you going on about Reef?
RD said we have good young D, I said we have Hughes for sure but after that it is unknown who will make it. So to say that the team is set for D is asinine.
He thinks all of the other prospects will pan out and that Tryamkin will come back
Would that be like thinking a forward drafted in the first round of the 2019 draft will pan out, replacing a panned out Boeser (traded for a top 4 D-man)?
Top pairing.... your reading skills are horrendous. Think Seth Jones
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10281
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

According to your calculations none of these four prospects will amount to a top pairing D-man - Hughes, Juolevi, Woo, Tryamkin?
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

RoyalDude wrote: Sun Nov 25, 2018 9:38 am According to your calculations none of these four prospects will amount to a top pairing D-man - Hughes, Juolevi, Woo, Tryamkin?
Hughes might. I can’t see any of the others. Why would it a crime to have two top pairing d men?

Tryamkin is turning 25 in the new year.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10281
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sun Nov 25, 2018 9:47 am
RoyalDude wrote: Sun Nov 25, 2018 9:38 am According to your calculations none of these four prospects will amount to a top pairing D-man - Hughes, Juolevi, Woo, Tryamkin?
Hughes might. I can’t see any of the others. Why would it a crime to have two top pairing d men?

Tryamkin is turning 25 in the new year.
But trading a young panned out Boeser for a veteran top pairing D-man with the thought in mind of replacing Boeser with a 2019 1st round picked forward (wherever that will be, could be 11th pick in the draft) that is no guarantee to pan out is the stuff of brilliance Blob especially since we only have 3 legitimate top 6 forwards in Pettersson, Horvat and Boeser and with potentially 4 top pairing D-men in Hughes, Woo, Tryamkin and Juolevi on their way not too mention Rathbone who is playing excellent in Harvard and Brisebios as well
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Where did I say I’d trade Boeser for a veteran?
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8072
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

I said it. The D sucks ass and theres only 1 impact defenseman in the pipeline. I dont buy Juolevi being a top pairing asset whatsoever...more like a 5-6 slot guy somewhere along the lines of Puliot.

StL is reeling and needs a major shakeup. They have Parayenko and Pieterangelo who would instantly become our top guy on the back end.

I smell weakness that could be exploited
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10281
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Bubbles, end of the day, have faith in Jimbro’s masterplan. He knows a thing or two

Tyler Madden - 5 goals 5 assists northeastern rookie

Oliver Wahlstrom - 3 goals 0 assists Boston College rookie

Remember when you pee’d your mini skirt when Jimbro selected Madden over Jack Wise

Jimbro is taking us to the promise land
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Uncle dans leg wrote: Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:56 am I said it. The D sucks ass and theres only 1 impact defenseman in the pipeline. I dont buy Juolevi being a top pairing asset whatsoever...more like a 5-6 slot guy somewhere along the lines of Puliot.

StL is reeling and needs a major shakeup. They have Parayenko and Pieterangelo who would instantly become our top guy on the back end.

I smell weakness that could be exploited
But Dude said the pipeline is loaded with top pairing d men.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Carl Yagro
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1853
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: On wide shoulders...

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Carl Yagro »

Uncle dans leg wrote: Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:56 am I said it. The D sucks ass and theres only 1 impact defenseman in the pipeline. I dont buy Juolevi being a top pairing asset whatsoever...more like a 5-6 slot guy somewhere along the lines of Puliot.
How dare you?!

Eye hand! Eye hand!

:look: <runs away>
Heavy is the Tarp... :cry:
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10281
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Tim Hunter on Jett Woo -

"has a bright mind for making right plays"

"has a reputation for popping guys"

"you don't see guys who play that old school smash mouth, run over people style. Not a lot of guys are will to do that anymore but I think there's still room for that style in the game"

"He's a throwback defenseman, he keeps players honest, not afraid to step up and run over someone in the neutral zone. And when a tough guy steps up, Jett tells him to bring it on, but he's got a lot more skill than you see most nigths"

Jett Woo - right shot defenceman
Quinn Hughes - left shot defenceman

The future top pairing defence, right there for ya Bloberino!

Blob - "trade Boeser for a top pairing defenceman. Replace Boeser with the 2019 1st round pick." whom bob thinks will "pan out" but doesn't think Bennings D-man he's drafted will pan out. Michael Dal Colle and Dylan Strome say hi. You see the delirium that Blobbles puts us through on a daily basis?

Juolevi
Tryamkin

Brisebios
Rathbone

Yeah, sure does look like Jim Benning don't give a shit about the defence.

The future on D is sooooo bright, gotta wear shades
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9098
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

The pipeline is bursting with top pairing d men
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10281
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: The Great Jim Benning Debate!

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Sun Nov 25, 2018 11:50 am The pipeline is bursting with top pairing d men
So you don't think that left shot Hughes and right shot Woo have the potential to be a top pairing defence? They won't pan out? But the 2019 first round pick forward will at the expense superstar forward Boeser?

You're completely out to lunch, Blob. You are the only human on gods green earth who think's Hughes will not be a top pairing defenceman? And ta boot, his Jake Muzzin/Brent Seabrook in Jett Woo is sitting right there waiting to join up to form this amazing top pairing for years to come. Get off the lunacy my friend, you're not making sense.
”This was how twentieth-century Fascism began: with a magnetic leader exploiting widespread dissatisfaction by promising all things.” - Madeleine K. Albright - Fascism: A Warning
Locked