2025 Canucks Off-season

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Post Reply
User avatar
Picker of Cherries
CC 2nd Team All-Star
Posts: 456
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2023 1:11 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Picker of Cherries »

Silovs isn’t eligible for waivers and the way he is playing someone is going to take him if management sends him down at the beginning of next season.
They should be trading one of their top three goalies after Abby’s season is over - Arty? or role the dice and move Demmer for a bigger return? Demmer for a 2C might be worth it if they really believe Silovs has turned the corner.
Either way, good on Silovs for making himself a consideration again.
“Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room.”
- President Merkin Muffley
User avatar
Madcombinepilot
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:54 am
Location: Saskatoon, Sk.

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Madcombinepilot »

Picker of Cherries wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 6:50 am Silovs isn’t eligible for waivers and the way he is playing someone is going to take him if management sends him down at the beginning of next season.
They should be trading one of their top three goalies after Abby’s season is over - Arty? or role the dice and move Demmer for a bigger return? Demmer for a 2C might be worth it if they really believe Silovs has turned the corner.
Either way, good on Silovs for making himself a consideration again.
Silvos and Chtyl for a 2nd line C
The 'Chain of Command' is the chain I am going to beat you with until you understand I am in charge.
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9093
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

You aren't getting a 2 C for Demko or Silovs/Chtyl.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Meds
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3909
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Meds »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 9:18 am You aren't getting a 2 C for Demko or Silovs/Chtyl.
Demko is a top-5 goaltender when healthy. He's worth a 2C.

Goalies don't rank as high as 1C or 1D, but when you consider some of the 2C's in the league, the value is there. His health does devalue him, but chances are Demko would command $8.5M (or more) in free agency. In terms of payroll, that is an elite 2C.

Agree on Silovs and Chytil. The former has no resume at the NHL level outside of a playoff round in which his struggles with tracking long shots through traffic was badly exposed. Chytil is one decent hit (or awkward contact) away from missing most of a season. There's no value there.
Somewhere in NW BC trying (yet again) to trade a(nother) Swede…..
theman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by theman »

User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Chef Boi RD »

theman wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 12:11 pm Top 6 forward issue resolved?


https://x.com/canucks/status/1925626996756762639?s=61
No
User avatar
rats19
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 4462
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:21 am
Location: over here.....

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by rats19 »

theman wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 12:11 pm Top 6 forward issue resolved?


https://x.com/canucks/status/1925626996756762639?s=61
Winky needed… :wink:
I am he as you are he as you are me
And we are all together….
theman
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1075
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 2:51 pm

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by theman »

rats19 wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 12:59 pm
theman wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 12:11 pm Top 6 forward issue resolved?


https://x.com/canucks/status/1925626996756762639?s=61
Winky needed… :wink:
Then it is no fun. ;)
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9093
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

Mëds wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 11:09 am
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 9:18 am You aren't getting a 2 C for Demko or Silovs/Chtyl.
Demko is a top-5 goaltender when healthy. He's worth a 2C.

Goalies don't rank as high as 1C or 1D, but when you consider some of the 2C's in the league, the value is there. His health does devalue him, but chances are Demko would command $8.5M (or more) in free agency. In terms of payroll, that is an elite 2C.

Agree on Silovs and Chytil. The former has no resume at the NHL level outside of a playoff round in which his struggles with tracking long shots through traffic was badly exposed. Chytil is one decent hit (or awkward contact) away from missing most of a season. There's no value there.
He hasn't been healthy much. He has one year left on his deal. He's soon to be 30. If he tears it up next year and agrees to an extension that is reasonable, he might get a low end 2 C.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6211
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

theman wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 12:11 pm Top 6 forward issue resolved?


https://x.com/canucks/status/1925626996756762639?s=61
Interesting. You never know.
el rey del mambo
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6211
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 1:36 pm
Mëds wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 11:09 am
Blob Mckenzie wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 9:18 am You aren't getting a 2 C for Demko or Silovs/Chtyl.
Demko is a top-5 goaltender when healthy. He's worth a 2C.

Goalies don't rank as high as 1C or 1D, but when you consider some of the 2C's in the league, the value is there. His health does devalue him, but chances are Demko would command $8.5M (or more) in free agency. In terms of payroll, that is an elite 2C.

Agree on Silovs and Chytil. The former has no resume at the NHL level outside of a playoff round in which his struggles with tracking long shots through traffic was badly exposed. Chytil is one decent hit (or awkward contact) away from missing most of a season. There's no value there.
He hasn't been healthy much. He has one year left on his deal. He's soon to be 30. If he tears it up next year and agrees to an extension that is reasonable, he might get a low end 2 C.
Going with Lankinen and Arty would be a ballsy move. Arty has been lights out in these playoffs so far. I wouldn't mind seeing them pull the trigger if they can get a decent C for Thatcher.
el rey del mambo
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 9093
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

It would be Thatcher + a good prospect to get axguy you want.

I've seen talk of Anthony Cirelli but why is JBB moving him and making a massive hole behind Point?

Mavrick Bourque could be a target. Kid will be a good player, though I think Dallas will want that ELC with the amount of kids and picks they've dealt. That's why teams build up good pipelines, so they can use them as trade collateral as well as keeping the flow of good young kids.
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 10256
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Chef Boi RD »

Blob Mckenzie wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 2:34 pm It would be Thatcher + a good prospect to get axguy you want.

I've seen talk of Anthony Cirelli but why is JBB moving him and making a massive hole behind Point?

Mavrick Bourque could be a target. Kid will be a good player, though I think Dallas will want that ELC with the amount of kids and picks they've dealt. That's why teams build up good pipelines, so they can use them as trade collateral as well as keeping the flow of good young kids.
I’ve been talking Mavrik Bourque for awhile but I’d be surprised if Dallas traded him. I’d love to snag Kulich from Buffalo but that would require a D-Pete or Willander to move that needle, same with Bourque.

As I’ve said, we would have to endure pain to fix the mess of our top 6 or we plug it with a UFA like Granlund? I’d rather re-up Suter and chase a Granlund than keeping up with the regular assaults on a draft pick and prospect asset pool. Enuffs enuff.

We ain’t getting much for Demko, especially with his injury run, age and pending UFA status. That ship has sailed. I still say we use the 2025 1st on Ravensbergen or Iankovic
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
MVP
MVP
Posts: 6211
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:23 am

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Megaterio Llamas »

el rey del mambo
User avatar
Lancer
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1129
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:41 am
Location: Kingston, Ontario

Re: 2025 Canucks Off-season

Post by Lancer »

Megaterio Llamas wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 1:50 pm
theman wrote: Thu May 22, 2025 12:11 pm Top 6 forward issue resolved?


https://x.com/canucks/status/1925626996756762639?s=61
Interesting. You never know.
My son’s Latvian friend compared the kid to Mason Marchment. He was just one age level above my boy when he played there. Probably a better shot than Ronalds Kenins back in the day as far as Latvian forward prospects in Vancouver’s system.
Love the Sport. Love the Team.

Hate the League.
Post Reply