Yeah. That's the only reason to trade him.
This nonsense about getting a top-6 center is ridiculous. The team needs a 1C.
Moderator: Referees
Yeah. That's the only reason to trade him.
Exactly, him and a 1st isn’t getting you even a legit #2 at the right age.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 7:11 pm I think people might be overestimating Willander's value a little.
I think I'd rather hold onto him at least for now. I don't see the return knocking my socks off.
I agree on the return. He is worth more than we would get back. Anyways, we need him just as much as we need another center, both in terms of skills and cap hits.Megaterio Llamas wrote: ↑Sun Apr 13, 2025 7:11 pm I think people might be overestimating Willander's value a little.
I think I'd rather hold onto him at least for now. I don't see the return knocking my socks off.
IMO, numbers are going to be a key consideration. While a spot in the top-6 next season is by no means reserved for him, given his pedigree and development to-date, it's a safe bet to assume that Willander should be ready for the NHL vice AHL. Are management and the coaching staff ready to roll out a 3rd pairing of D-Petey and Willander next season?Picker of Cherries wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:41 am It’s taken the Canucks so long to finally looked to have fixed RHD, it’d be hard to see them give up on Willander and watch him succeed elsewhere. They need to find a way to improve the forwards without weakening the defence and goalies. Hard to do, yes, but not impossible. That’s how good managements earns their big bucks. Any idiot could trade Willander for an under preforming centre they hope will blossom in Vancouver.
Almost certainly.
That’s a good take Lancer.Lancer wrote: ↑Mon Apr 14, 2025 10:33 am IMO, numbers are going to be a key consideration. While a spot in the top-6 next season is by no means reserved for him, given his pedigree and development to-date, it's a safe bet to assume that Willander should be ready for the NHL vice AHL. Are management and the coaching staff ready to roll out a 3rd pairing of D-Petey and Willander next season?
If you're Willander and you see a stacked top-4 with little hope of cracking it in the near future, why wouldn't you consider playing out your NCAA career and sign as a UFA? Is he willing to bet and wait on management giving Myers the heave-ho in two years' time? Management's hands may get forced a bit if Willander decides not to sign this summer.
All other things being equal, prospects with Willander's position, pedigree and demonstrated development don't get traded. I wager Allvin and Co. see Willander as taking Myers' spot down the road, and have communicated such to Willander and/or his agent. I'm also pretty sure they would like to get their 2C and still keep Willander. I just don't see the trade capital available to management as being enough to get that contender-calibre 2C without likely trading Willander.
True story.