MrG9002! wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:06 pm
Demko is done. If you can't play at 100% the NHL isn't for you.
Lankinnen should be the Canucks No.1 goalie. Trade Demko for a backup goalie or bring up a young up and comer. Personally I'd be for bringing up a new kid with energy, and eagerness to prove what he's got.
Silov played well during the playoffs but has lost the touch.
Demko and Silov are liabilities....next!!
Now I learned how to spell Lankinen. HA!
What's a sock?
The only acronym i know for sock is some guy who marries a single Mom with kids.
"How many socks ya got Bill?"
"Socks?"
"Yeah, Some other c%$ts kids"
Should there be a space between each line to make it clearer that when a person says, Lankinen should be our No.1 goalie it means they like his play.
I'm pretty sure a period signifies the end of a sentence in English.
MrG9002! wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:17 pm
Now I learned how to spell Lankinen. HA!
What's a sock?
The only acronym i know for sock is some guy who marries a single Mom with kids.
"How many socks ya got Bill?"
"Socks?"
"Yeah, Some other c%$ts kids"
Should there be a space between each line to make it clearer that when a person says, Lankinen should be our No.1 goalie it means they like his play.
I'm pretty sure a period signifies the end of a sentence in English.
He has come in here and really saved our bacon, his play has been absolutely stellar. I'm with you MrG and I've been thinking this way for a bit now.
And the thing is, you need your starter to play more than 20 games a year. If these guys don't get this done then they deserve what they get as far as I'm concerned.