sure Chef - is this your way (in Chef speak) of saying - Eye dew knot sea it that weigh -



Moderator: Referees
sure Chef - is this your way (in Chef speak) of saying - Eye dew knot sea it that weigh -
My error was a simple typo - your error is a lack of understanding of the english language - big difference there "Citiot".Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:06 am You started the spelling bee contest, Theo Fleury. Not eye, Cowboy.
OK Kotter, assign me an English tutor FFS.BCExpat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:15 amMy error was a simple typo - your error is a lack of understanding of the english language - big difference there "Citiot".Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:06 am You started the spelling bee contest, Theo Fleury. Not eye, Cowboy.
Remember that ignore function BCE?BCExpat wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:15 amMy error was a simple typo - your error is a lack of understanding of the english language - big difference there "Citiot".Chef Boi RD wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 11:06 am You started the spelling bee contest, Theo Fleury. Not eye, Cowboy.
The simple fact is: Vice President Harris can’t tell the truth, because an honest admission of her beliefs – and the failures of the last three-and-a-half years – would doom her campaign. The ABC team did all it could to stop President Trump from telling the truth about her. The most glaring example was the blunt intervention that there were no states in which babies could be left to die after they were born. That was an outright lie. The truth is that in Tim Walz’s Minnesota at least eight babies have been left to die after botched abortions. It is a matter of public record. If you want a pro-infanticide vice president, then "Tampon Tim" is your guy.
Actual affidavit at the link.ABC Whistleblower Affidavit Drops and YES, It Really Is a Bombshell if True
Here are some of the key points according to the whistleblower’s affidavit:
- ABC News was coordinating with Kamala Harris’ campaign far more than with Donald Trump’s campaign.
- They agreed to not ask questions on certain subjects that would have been detrimental to Harris. The same considerations were not offered to Trump, nor did his campaign ask for them.
- “Sample” questions were provided to the Harris campaign and not to Trump’s.
- Fact-checks on Donald Trump were required by the Harris campaign.
- Harris was not to face comparable fact-checks.
- Split-screen views were required to favor Harris.
It is noteworthy that the affidavit was signed, notarized, and mailed out BEFORE the debate. The fact that everything the whistleblower detailed appears to have happened makes this exceedingly damning.