Around the league (signings, RFAs injuries)

[Strangelove]

Did his ice time go up or down over his last ten to fifteen games?

For the purposes of this debate, does it matter?

You brought him up

That's right, I brought him up to disprove your "icetime on certain teams" argument.

Again I rhetorically ask: For the purposes of this debate, does it matter?

[Cousin Strawberry]

So whats being debated here? Guddy was brutal in canucks colours...other than scrapping what was he doing to justify being in the top 4?

Hargraves has been saying for years that certain Canuck players would receive drastically less icetime on "top teams".

Gudbranson and Sutter being the main two...

Shittsburg got their asses handed to them last year. Not sure if I'd be waving any guddy flags doc. Id peg him at a bottom pairing guy who sits the odd game.

Sutter is an ok to decent player...not top line or anything. Doyles out to lunch on that one

[Mickey107]

.
Guddy lacks mobility, ..............................................and speed.

Sutter is a third line center with a bit of a consistency problem amd a bit injury prone now. Would be acceptable at 2.8 / 3.1 per season.
Guess what his best NHL season was? If you said his last year with the Pens, you'ld be right...ka-ching...

[Cousin Strawberry]

.
Guddy lacks mobility, ..............................................and speed.

Sutter is a third line center with a bit of a consistency problem amd a bit injury prone now. Would be acceptable at 2.8 / 3.1 per season.
Guess what his best NHL season was? If you said his last year with the Pens, you'ld be right...ka-ching...

I commend the energy spent turning those dots white mick. Why is another story

[Mickey107]

.
.
................................................................................Huh ?

[Cornuck]

[Blob Mckenzie]

Did his ice time go up or down over his last ten to fifteen games?

For the purposes of this debate, does it matter?

You brought him up

That's right, I brought him up to disprove your "icetime on certain teams" argument.

Again I rhetorically ask: For the purposes of this debate, does it matter?

Gudbranson saw his toi decrease in Pittsburgh fairly dramatically as the last 20 + games wound down.

[Blob Mckenzie]

So whats being debated here? Guddy was brutal in canucks colours...other than scrapping what was he doing to justify being in the top 4?

Hargraves has been saying for years that certain Canuck players would receive drastically less icetime on "top teams".

Gudbranson and Sutter being the main two...

Shittsburg got their asses handed to them last year. Not sure if I'd be waving any guddy flags doc. Id peg him at a bottom pairing guy who sits the odd game.

Sutter is an ok to decent player...not top line or anything. Doyles out to lunch on that one

What I said is that he’d be a fourth liner on a good team in 2019. Vancouver is not a good team.

[Strangelove]

Did his ice time go up or down over his last ten to fifteen games?

For the purposes of this debate, does it matter?

You brought him up

That's right, I brought him up to disprove your "icetime on certain teams" argument.

Again I rhetorically ask: For the purposes of this debate, does it matter?

Gudbranson saw his toi decrease in Pittsburgh fairly dramatically as the last 20 + games wound down.

*knocks on Doyle's forehead*

Irrelevant.

[Strangelove]

Sutter is an ok to decent player...not top line or anything. Doyles out to lunch on that one

What I said is that he’d be a fourth liner on a good team in 2019. Vancouver is not a good team.

Again, he was a 17 minute forward in Pittsburgh.

And no, that's not what you usually say, this is:

But this is a GM paying Eriksson and Sutter 10.4 million when they are basically 4th liners

an awesome 4th line like Eriksson, Sutter and Beagle. 13.35 million well spent right there

Sure I can see teams lining up to take these two air thieves (Eriksson and Sutter) off of Elmer’s hands. Who wouldn’t want a couple fourth liners for that kinda dough? May as well keep them. Play them with Beagle and have a 13.35 million dollar 4th line

Spending 19 million on four 4th line scrubs is silly. Clear out the deadweight ASAP. Flesh that shit out. Sutter, Sooner, Louis, Beagle could be replaced by four equal players for 6 million

Paying three 4th line guys a total of 13.35 million annually on your cap hit is stupid.

having boat anchors manning the 4th line and siphoning 13 + million to do it, isn’t good business.

Shouldn't you be at a meeting somewhere saying:

"My name is Doyle Hargraves and I am a roaring alcoholic."

[Strangelove]

Sutter is a third line center...

Yup, on any NHL team needing a 3rd line centre + #1 PK centre, he's your man.

And that is going to add up to 16-17 minutes per game on any NHL team.

This is why 4 teams were rumoured to be inquiring about him last year.

(after he returned from the shoulder injury and before the groin injury)

[Blob Mckenzie]

Mod loses debate again. Moves goalpost again. Twists debate in a knot again. Mod resorts to personal attacks again. Rinse, repeat. Wot a mess

[Strangelove]

Yeah, that's what happened!

What colour is the beer in your world?

[Blob Mckenzie]

Yeah, that's what happened!

Good to see you’re catching on

[Madcombinepilot]

Yeah, that's what happened!

What colour is the beer in your world?

Don't matter. It all ends up piss coloured in the end.