US Erection 12 *AND* 16 *AND* 20 *AND* 22 *AND* 24 *AND* Beyond

[damonberryman]

Such passion. Ok. I will let you know when you can come and punk me if that is what you want? Should be in the next 6 months. I live in Albany, NY and if you come this way please let me know. In the meantime just ignore my posts as they seem to be useless to you....right? No point in hashing this over again and again.

[ukcanuck]

Well "burning fossil fuels until they run out" is probably the best way to postpone WWIII

... so I suppose I'm in favour of "switching over to renewable energy" asap.

Explain how one would take the above any other way than you would be in favour switching over to renewable energy in order to speed up WW3?

I am a Christian though, I've stated that more than a few times in these forums.

(you used to pretend to be the same... remember?)

I am sure even you must realise that there are many versions of christianity. That you would even contemplate accusing me of pretending to be christian reminds me of the line:

How many protestants does it take to change a light bulb?

none, they live in eternal darkness

you do live in darkness don't you Doc?

That's why I dropped the "discussion" about Israeli brutality in Palestine.

Nope this is why you dropped said discussion:

http://www.canuckscorner.com/forums/vie ... 83#p214183

Proving Per correct once more, you surely do love to tell others what they are thinking.

Did you think people had forgotten about how you got nailed on all the lies you were spreading?

I don't know Doc, more than likely no one gave a shit at the time Israel/Palestine politics isn't exactly a hot topic on a hockey board.

However, I repeat for anyone bored enough to scroll through an old discussion. I dropped it because having a reasonable discussion about a horrific situation in the middle east with a person who responds with slander accusations and sheer obtuseness is a waste of time.

It became quite obvious quite quickly that you are not capable of a balanced debate on this subject then and its become quite obvious lately the reason why.

Any discussion on the behaviour of Israel towards Palestine constitutes a threat to a Christian zionist's belief structure.

I mean we gotta have a new temple built in Jerusalem in order for armageddon to happen right?

No wonder the homophobic vitriol towards David Norris. The guy almost single handedly brought Ireland out of the dark ages of gay rights and you don't think he's made enemies amongst your right-wing christian buddies in Ireland?

Character assassination is a classic right wing tactic so I guess I shouldn't have been surprised. But i'll bet you were highly disappointed when I didn't step into your trap. You were just itching for me to hand you the ammunition to slander me too weren't you Doc?

Typical behavior of a fully-indoctrinated goosestepping antisemitic moron...

Newbies interested in the truth about UK/moi should read a few pages of that linked thread

Watch as UK writes-off facts from encyclopedia/NY-Times/Washington-Post/etc

... as all part of some insanely massive Jewish conspiracy.

Watch as UK promotes discredited lies with his fingers in his ears, same ole, same ole...

Funny how when it comes to AGW there's a media conspiracy but when it comes to honest reporting in Palestine the media is believable and virtuous

However you're a little off the mark, its all part of some zionist connection to organised islamophobia

Death in the Middle East: An Analysis of How the New York Times and Chicago Tribune Framed Killings in the second Palestinian Intifada*



ABSTRACT
This paper analyzed New York Times and Chicago Tribune newspaper coverage of killings in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The purpose of the study was to analyze how the two newspapers framed the political violence of Israelis and Palestinians to find out what specific framing devices the newspapers used to express positions. Findings from the content analysis employed here suggest that the New York Times and Chicago Tribune framed Israeli-Palestinian conflict violence in such a way as to legitimate Israeli killings by implicitly justifying Israeli violence and assigning more prominence to the Israeli perspective. Results also suggest that the newspapers de-legitimated Palestinian violence by implicitly condemning Palestinian killings.

www2.gsu.edu/~wwwaus/jmem/Elmasry2009.doc

[2Fingers]

I was born at St. Vincent's Hospital in Vancouver in late 57. A Canadian citizen.
My father served in Korea with the Canadians and had his back broken but recovered.
My grandfather served for the Canadians in both WW1 and WW2. He was no boy in WW2.
My Grandmother on Dad's side was a nurse in WW1.
On my Mother's side my American Grandfather was killed in WW2.
My Grandmother worked as a maid in the U.S. then Canada.
Four of my eight Great Grand parents were born in North America, the others in England, Scotland and Ireland.
I have spent no less than 11 of my 58 years in the U.S. and have at some point visited almost all major cities.
In the late 70s and early 80s I was playing hockey in the U.S.
From 1990 to 1996 I served with both the American and Canadian militaries as a private contractor training them in Air to Air and Air to Ground Photography as aviation photography is what I did.
I've heard many, many points of view and have seen a great deal.
For the record, I am more of a science guy than a religious one and I hate war as much as anyone else but I understand it, do you?
I understand that politics can seem extremist and over passionate, do you?
Understand your adversary in debate before you put your foot in your mouth, again.
By the way, I'll yank it out for you, if you think that's safe.
You are not qualified to advise me on anything, little-big man.
You are exactly the type that one day, if not already, Is going to get shit-kicked in a road rage situation because you don't think before you spew...

Mick your one to talk, think before you spew.

Majority of us on this site has fathers, uncles and other relatives that served in the Armed forces and did tours in the wars. I don't think at any time he was disrespecting the avg person fighting for their country. My dad spent 25 years in the Canadian military which is why my brothers, sisters and I are all born in a different province. I protect the Canadian forces just as much as anyone else but I don't threaten others like you do.

Why do you feel compelled to that?


Anyways, back on topic.

Trump even when is trying to connect to specific people he still alienates them further.

[Cornuck]

Ok - the next poster to make any kind of reference to a threat of violence will be going on holiday for a while - not that I think there's a chance something violent will happen - just because it's fucking stupid.

Zero tolerance.

[griz]

Some more food for though about Climate Change...

Global Warming Fraud - Lord Christopher Monckton Before U S Congress :

[Strangelove]

if reef has a bias then you have given it to him

I was talking about Reef's bias toward AGW (you schmuck)

*quotes the nasty bits of Strangelove's posts*

Yeah, it looks pretty bad when you quote someone completely out of context.

You posted exactly .3% of my total words in this thread btw.

Thanks for proving yet-again that you ignore any+all points made by any+all opponents.

BTW you started the Chicken Little conversation by first posting "I am not a Chicken Little..."

(begging the rebuttal: "Actually you are a Chicken Little because..."

Damon first called moi "passive-aggressive"... I merely returned the favour with a attached.

"Gong-show monkey" is commonly used as a description of a dumb post.

"Schmuck" + asking someone if he's being "stupid"... does this really hurt anyone's feelings?

"Fully indoctrinated, bat shit crazy" = brainwashed folks who won't/can't listen to reason.

"Brainwashed zombie" = more of the same.

"Deluded self-righteous totalitarian folk" + "environazi" + "leftist" = fair descriptions of someone.

(there are many people in the world who fairly fit those descriptions, what's the problem?)

"Goosestepping"... I already gave Webster's definition of that word = "mindless".

"ESL buddy"... Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you said you are an ESL teacher overseas?

"your Irish politician friend was a PEDOPHILE" = TRUTH!!

"but yes, a homosexual pedophile"... wtf your Irish politician admits it, is PROUD of it!

"an antisemitic moron”... is exactly what I proved you to be in that linked thread.

"tramp stamp"... I did not say that, try again.

Damon stated he's "not as much of a man as Fred McFeely Rogers"... I merely underscored it.

"Tree-boinkers" = "tree-huggers".

"Drama Queen" + "Prison Bitch"... were a tongue-in-cheek response to this Damon post:

Are you married Per? If not would you consider a long distance relationship with an East End boy who visited Oakalla and the old B.C. Pen too many times? I have chilled a lot but that may be due to the weed and benzos but let us not get caught up in details. I currently live in NY and am both Canadian and a British citizen so we will have to do this thing before Brexit is implemented.

Fair response to a post like that no?

Y'know, some folk like to have a little fun around here sometimes IF that is FUCKING okay with you!

lets not pretend that any of the above is meaningful as reasonable debate

Yeahno, the other 99.7% of my words contained the “reasonable debate” part.

Sure I use colourful language, but you’ve likened me to Mcarthy, Onceler and a Jehovah’s Witness.

You also said I “label any and all criticism of Isreal as racist and antisemitism”.

You said I was falsely referring to your Irish politician friend as a PEDOPHILE (he admits it).

You claimed you weren’t nailed for spreading lies in the linked thread.

You claimed that everything I’ve said in this thread is summed-up by the out-of-context .3% above.

Yup, a c-word such as yourself should expect to have a few colourful words/phrases shot his way.

[Strangelove]

You do the same thing to him as you do to everyone.
Derision, name calling and complete evasion of anything that doesn't fit your version of things.

Pot/kettle... especially that last part.

I do admit that my time on canuckscorner has darkened my sense of humour somewhat, but I've learned from the best and really it seems to be the only language you understand.

So you admit to the very sins you of which you accuse me!!

Well guess what Buttercup, in the end your sins are much worse than mine...

I asked you to watch "every second of MY videos, especially "the last two".

You promised that you would... but you did not.

I did watch as much of your propaganda I as could stomach

... barely worth the effort to pay attention for longer than maybe a minute.

but I spent considerably more than that on your links. The way I see it, you owe me an hour of my time.

Yes well obviously you wasted that hour googling the links in order to regurgitate leftist propaganda.

Nothing new, and as I said you your masters understood neither Molyneux nor Cook's abstract.

… and instead launched into an ad hominem rage (remember?)

while technically it’s an ad hominem, it is not a logical fallacy as you would sneakily intend.

Well, now that you mention it, you are clearly guilty of both seeing as how you didn't watch the videos...

BTW you constantly interchange GW and AGW, ya might wanna work on that good buddy!

[damonberryman]

You do the same thing to him as you do to everyone.
Derision, name calling and complete evasion of anything that doesn't fit your version of things.

Pot/kettle... especially that last part.

I do admit that my time on canuckscorner has darkened my sense of humour somewhat, but I've learned from the best and really it seems to be the only language you understand.

So you admit to the very sins you of which you accuse me!!

Well guess what Buttercup, in the end your sins are much worse than mine...

I asked you to watch "every second of MY videos, especially "the last two".

You promised that you would... but you did not.

I did watch as much of your propaganda I as could stomach

... barely worth the effort to pay attention for longer than maybe a minute.

but I spent considerably more than that on your links. The way I see it, you owe me an hour of my time.

Yes well obviously you wasted that hour googling the links in order to regurgitate leftist propaganda.

Nothing new, and as I said you your masters understood neither Molyneux nor Cook's abstract.

… and instead launched into an ad hominem rage (remember?)

while technically it’s an ad hominem, it is not a logical fallacy as you would sneakily intend.

Well, now that you mention it, you are clearly guilty of both seeing as how you didn't watch the videos...

BTW you constantly interchange GW and AGW, ya might wanna work on that good buddy!

I will pray for your soul to have peace Doc.

[damonberryman]

Ok - the next poster to make any kind of reference to a threat of violence will be going on holiday for a while - not that I think there's a chance something violent will happen - just because it's fucking stupid.

Zero tolerance.

I hear you

[Topper]

At least Trump is attempting to do something about Muslim invasion rather than what's going on in Germany or Sweden. And you know what they say about not knowing history and being doomed to repeat it. It's not like there haven't been Muslin invasions throughout history. Sharia law isn't compatible with non Muslims is it? And don't forget that the non-radical Muslims are targets for the Muslim extremists too.

There's no Muslim invasion going on. Just a whole lot of people fleeing from religious extremism.

Besides, there was roughly a million Syrian refugees heading to Europe last year. There are more than 300 million people living in the European Union. It's a drop in the ocean.

And these are people trying to get away from the religious loonies.
I doubt they are going to push for extreme measures here.

I just look at Trump and see a demagogue trying to demonize a religious minority with roots in the Middle East.
Hmmmm... Now, why does this picture look familiar?

But if Clinton gets in we'll have Sharia Law across North America and we're All DOOMED!

A donation to the Foundation could make it happen.

[ukcanuck]

Some more food for though about Climate Change...

Global Warming Fraud - Lord Christopher Monckton Before U S Congress :

Sigh, the drivel just doesn't end...

Griz you're obviously not British or you would not be referencing a political advisor to the United kingdom independence party.

First of all Monckton is an hereditary lord, literally born with a silver spoon in his mouth who's comfortable life style depends on the economic status quo.

Secondly the guy is an advisor to the UKIP party - an far right extreme populist movement similar to the tea party in the united states

If anyone had an agenda beyond science its this guy

heres a link to some background behind what policies UKIP stands for..

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/United_Kin ... ence_Party

However lets just stick to the science in your you tube video.

http://static.stthomas.edu/jpabraham/?u ... esentation

warning: Do not watch the latter link if you do not want your bubble burst.

[ukcanuck]

I was talking about Reef's bias toward AGW (you schmuck)

Thats interesting because I believe he was talking about the constant name calling and general absence of reasonable debate from you.

*quotes the nasty bits of Strangelove's posts*

Yeah, it looks pretty bad when you quote someone completely out of context.

Well shit Doc, now you know how David Norris must have felt. Imagine having your words twisted and not only tossed back in your face, but also coated with slander? Can’t be much fun I know

You posted exactly .3% of my total words in this thread btw.

Is that an option here? Is there a function on Canuckscorner that actually counts what percent a person quotes another poster? thats pretty cool

Thanks for proving yet-again that you ignore any+all points made by any+all opponents.

BTW you started the Chicken Little conversation by first posting "I am not a Chicken Little..."

(begging the rebuttal: "Actually you are a Chicken Little because..."

Damon first called moi "passive-aggressive"... I merely returned the favour with a attached.

"Gong-show monkey" is commonly used as a description of a dumb post.

"Schmuck" + asking someone if he's being "stupid"... does this really hurt anyone's feelings?

"Fully indoctrinated, bat shit crazy" = brainwashed folks who won't/can't listen to reason.

"Brainwashed zombie" = more of the same.

"Deluded self-righteous totalitarian folk" + "environazi" + "leftist" = fair descriptions of someone.

(there are many people in the world who fairly fit those descriptions, what's the problem?)

"Goosestepping"... I already gave Webster's definition of that word = "mindless".

"ESL buddy"... Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't you said you are an ESL teacher overseas?
**edit: nope I'm an actual high school teacher**

"your Irish politician friend was a PEDOPHILE" = TRUTH!!

"but yes, a homosexual pedophile"... wtf your Irish politician admits it, is PROUD of it!

"an antisemitic moron”... is exactly what I proved you to be in that linked thread.

"tramp stamp"... I did not say that, try again.

Damon stated he's "not as much of a man as Fred McFeely Rogers"... I merely underscored it.

"Tree-boinkers" = "tree-huggers".

"Drama Queen" + "Prison Bitch"... were a tongue-in-cheek response to this Damon post:

Are you married Per? If not would you consider a long distance relationship with an East End boy who visited Oakalla and the old B.C. Pen too many times? I have chilled a lot but that may be due to the weed and benzos but let us not get caught up in details. I currently live in NY and am both Canadian and a British citizen so we will have to do this thing before Brexit is implemented.

Fair response to a post like that no?

Y'know, some folk like to have a little fun around here sometimes IF that is FUCKING okay with you!

Doc, it seems thou doth protest too much?

lets not pretend that any of the above is meaningful as reasonable debate

Yeahno, the other 99.7% of my words contained the “reasonable debate” part.

really? can you really work it out to a three tenths of one percent? that’s so cool

Sure I use colourful language, but you’ve likened me to Mcarthy, Onceler and a Jehovah’s Witness.

This is true I referenced McCarthy when you labelled me a communist as an “ad hominem.” I don't know- kinda felt like a kangaroo court at the time? shrug...

The Onceler, its kind of fitting since you’re denying AGW in much the same fashion as the character in The Lorax wants to keep knitting sweaters.

Actually I believe I said watching your links is like trying to read the Watchtower and Awake magazines but I could be wrong… maybe I also inferred something along the lines of Paleo-conservatists engaging in groupthink similar to JWs

You also said I “label any and all criticism of Isreal as racist and antisemitism”.

You do…the evidence is readily apparent, I cant imagine why you would even bother to deny it.

You said I was falsely referring to your Irish politician friend as a PEDOPHILE (he admits it).

You are since the man has not been charged by police for an action that is surely a crime and we’ve already covered taking people’s words out of context.

You claimed you weren’t nailed for spreading lies in the linked thread.

I wasn’t I posted links that question Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the West bank

(You proclaiming them as lies does not make them so, therefore I could not have been nailed by anything but your opinion)

You claimed that everything I’ve said in this thread is summed-up by the out-of-context .3% above.

Nope I went through the last couple of days posts and isolated the amount of times you resorted to name calling in order to hi-lite the observation brought by Reefer and to refute your claims that you don't indulge in what are classic right wing tactics

I left alone the logical fallacies and the avoidance of my main point all along.

Namely that this whole Climate Change denier, liberal hoax conspiracy is entirely made up by far right wing Anarcho-Capitalists. (or paleo-conservatives if you prefer)

Ive dealt with the science by providing ample links to actual scientists who are open about their motivations (saving the environment for future generations.) and whom discount your "hoax" presenter's attempts to cloud the issue with half truths and faux science.

I’ve shown the connection between the men in each of the links you and Griz have provided.
(Their financial connection and membership in far right extreme "astroturf" populist organisations)

*astroturf populist meaning - fake grassroots populist

However, in the same breath you that you accuse me of

”ignore any+all points made by any+all opponents”

you have respond to exactly none of the above so far.

I can only surmise at this point that you won't deal with it because in fact, you cannot.

Yup, a c-word such as yourself should expect to have a few colourful words/phrases shot his way.

Whoa Doc it seems that I've got under your skin!

You do remember this is all in good fun right?

No really, you do realise this is all in good fun?

[Per]

Pretty good article in the Telegraph, written by a fellow Swede:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/08/why- ... olden-age/

[griz]

Pretty good article in the Telegraph, written by a fellow Swede:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/08/why- ... olden-age/

"It was the best of times, it was the worse of times."

It definitely is an exciting time to be alive.

"Liberty isn't given. It's taken."

[Strangelove]

Doc, it seems thou doth protest too much?

Yup, a c-word such as yourself should expect to have a few colourful words/phrases shot his way.

Whoa Doc it seems that I've got under your skin!

You do remember this is all in good fun right?

No really, you do realise this is all in good fun?

whoosh

See wot, I systematically protested my innocence in regard to alleged name-calling

... and in the end called you a c-word!

A C-WORD!!

HAHA the worst word yet!!!



Nothing?

Yeah, Strangehumour is wasted on c-words such as yourself...

(but don't feel bad, the fact you didn't get it makes it even funnier!)

You said I was falsely referring to your Irish politician friend as a PEDOPHILE (he admits it).

You are since the man has not been charged by police for an action that is surely a crime

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pedophile

Pedophile: a person who has a sexual interest in children

Norris has been an advocate for eliminating the age of consent.

Norris defended his longtime gay lover who was busted for sodomizing a 15-yr-old boy.

(basically called it normal behavior because the Ancient Greeks did it)

He has described sexual-relationships between men and boys as positive for both...

http://www.newengelpublishing.com/david ... -i-and-ii/
https://sites.google.com/site/norrisarticle/
http://cdn.thejournal.ie/media/2011/05/DNmagill1.jpg
http://cdn.thejournal.ie/media/2011/05/DNmagill3.jpg

You claimed you weren’t nailed for spreading lies in the linked thread.

I wasn’t I posted links that question Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the West bank

(You proclaiming them as lies does not make them so, therefore I could not have been nailed by anything but your opinion)

Nope, you were spreading wild accusations against Israel

... your only source being your Irish pedophile.

I referred you to various fact-checking sources encyclopedia/NY-Times/WashPost/etc

... all of which completely dispelled said Irish pedophile's nonsense.

You claimed that all these legit sources were lying because they are controlled by the Jews.

Hmmm that former lover was busted for buggering that boy by Israeli police (in Jerusalem)

... perhaps that's why your Irish pedophile made up rubbish about Israel!

(rubbish which I pointed out wasn't even supported by the alleged victims -> palestinians)

Yup it was you and your Irish pedophile vs... the civilized world.

THAT'S why you "dropped out" of the "debate".