Not entirely. The canucks had poor attendance until they got good. The Flames almost moved to Portland because of attendance woes (canadian dollar also factored in). The Sens have had issues. A decade ago I wouldn't be shocked to see 3 or 4 canadian teams in the bottom half for attendance.Waffle wrote:"The alternative is to have a losing franchise and losing franchises are only loved for so long."
I think Ken Holland has it wrong, at least in Canada. You just have to look at the attendance records for the Canadian hockey clubs to see that Canadian hockey fans will tolerate loosing hockey clubs for years and years. Toronto is probably the best example.
oh and anyone see the Kiprusoff embellishment last night? Sure he got a stick in the neck from Hornqvist (who was just slew footed by Bouwmeester) but it was like Kiprusoff was blown up! The stick went flying this way and he went flying the other way. I was pretty sure I had it on good authority from that site that he never ever embellishes, 'cause he's a Flame. He did Luongo proud on that one.
Also keep in mind that San Jose has 6 games in hand and are a much better team so you can likely cross them off the list of one of the 4 that need to fail. SO IMO 4 of 5 teams need to fall. Preds are 5 points up with a game in hand they will be hard to catch for the FLames I think. Stars have 3 games in hand but they were in this type of position last year and then fell (different coach now though).S_C wrote:No problem, Calgary.
After tonight's loss to Nashville, Calgary has 41 points in 40 games - so according to Sports Club Stats, which shows that the Western Conference is currently trending to 93 points to make the playoffs, Calgary only needs to go 26-16-0 to make it.
Oh, and hope that 4 of Phoenix, San Jose, Colorado, Dallas, Nashville, and St. Louis falter, and that the trend doesn't return to 97 points for which they would have to go 28-14-0.