GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

This forum is to discuss game day happenings. New threads will be posted for each game.

Moderator: Referees

Post Reply
User avatar
Island Nucklehead
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8392
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
Location: Ottawa

GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by Island Nucklehead »

Ehrhoff will suit up against his former squad.

Raycroft and Machesney will be in goal, I wouldn't be shocked if Raycroft got the full 60.

Sounds like Shirokov will draw back in, and Shorthouse on the Team said he should see some time with the Sedins.

Lineups could appear as:

D. Sedin - H. Sedin - Shirokov
Parrish - Scatchard - Burrows
Desbiens - Rypien - Hansen
Labrie - Bliznak - Walsky

Mitchell - Sauve
Ehrhoff - Ellington
O'Brien - Baumgartner

San Jose is NOT dressing Heatley, Thornton or Setoguchi. Sounds like they will ice Pavelski-Marleau-Clowe. With Raycroft in net and three non-NHL D-men, not to mention only 3 forwards with "guaranteed" spots (Sedins, Burrows), I see the Canucks being in a bit of trouble tonight. We'll see.


Also, Petrovicky's tryout is over, as he's out 4-6 weeks with an MCL injury.
http://canucks.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=499011

Hodgson is likely to play Saturday vs. Edmonton.
trouble

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by trouble »

Two things that will be fun to watch tonight

Shirokov playing with guys who can feed him the puck... Should puts some points on the board


As Canucks fans getting to watch the skill Of Ehrhoff. This guy can do it all and as i said before, will be a fan fovorite
User avatar
LotusBlossom
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:53 pm
Location: Metro Vancouver
Contact:

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by LotusBlossom »

I know it's preseason and it's only the second period...but 5-0 with Hodgson, both Sedins (Hank twice) and Mitchell doing the damage.

:)
parfois, je veux juste laisser tinber un coude volant sur le monde
User avatar
Linden Is God
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Timmins, Ontario

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by Linden Is God »

trouble wrote:
Shirokov playing with guys who can feed him the puck... Should puts some points on the board
Or guys he can feed the puck to.
GO CANUCKS GO !!!

:towel: :towel: :towel:
User avatar
nucklehead_88
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 880
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:55 pm
Location: Maple Ridge B.C.

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by nucklehead_88 »

apparently from what ive seen so far, 2 assists for shirokov
"HE WILL PLAY, YOU KNOW HE'LL PLAY, HE'LL PLAY ON CRUTCHES...."

Jim Robson
trouble

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by trouble »

LotusBlossom wrote:I know it's preseason and it's only the second period...but 5-0 with Hodgson, both Sedins (Hank twice) and Mitchell doing the damage.

:)
they got the scoring wrong.. Hodgson is not playing
trouble

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by trouble »

Linden Is God wrote:
trouble wrote:
Shirokov playing with guys who can feed him the puck... Should puts some points on the board
Or guys he can feed the puck to.
Ya that too..

Nice shot from the point from Ehrhoff... 2 points so far tonight
User avatar
Cornuck
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 14967
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:39 am
Location: Everywhere

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by Cornuck »

Hodgson - 1 goal on 1 shot. What did he do to get the game misconduct?

Edit - nevermind - even though he's listed in the NHL.com boxscore, I'm guessing he didn't play. :?
Doc: "BTW, Donny was right, you're smug."
User avatar
Badfish
MVP
MVP
Posts: 793
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: Victoria, BC

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by Badfish »

apparently they got Scatchard and Hodgson's numbers mixed up, Cody didn't play, Dave Scatchard scored the goal, not sure about the 10 min misconduct...
Jelly
CC Hall of Fan Member
Posts: 1130
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:20 am

Re: GDT: Canucks @ San Jose

Post by Jelly »

The misconduct was when Burrows was cheap shotted and scats jumped the guy and protected burrows.
This signature hates SOB as much as the guy who wrote this signature.
Post Reply