Kesler & Burrows.....to spark Sedin twins and Naslund:

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

Post Reply
Farhan Lalji

Kesler & Burrows.....to spark Sedin twins and Naslund:

Post by Farhan Lalji » Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:16 pm

Kesler & Burrows.....to spark Sedin twins and Naslund:

Hey guys/gals,

Just wanted to know your thoughts on this:

As we all know, Kesler and Burrows have elevated their games as of late.....while the Sedins' and Naslund have been cold. The question that I have, is should Kesler and Burrows be used to SPARK the Sedins' and Naslund?

In other words - do you think it would be a good idea to SEPARATE Kesler and Burrows, and use them on the top two lines?

Sedin-Sedin-Burrows
Naslund-Morrison-Kesler

OR

Sedin-Sedin-Kesler
Naslund-Morrison-Burrows

If Kesler were to play with the twins, he'd provide that line with some grit. Kesler is also a guy that has no problem driving the net. On top of that, he's a right handed shot. Kesler's speed would also make him a good fit for the Naslund/Morrison line. Kesler's willingness to play physical might also open things up for Naslund. If Kesler prefers playing center, then you could shift Morrison to RW.

Burrows would also help create space on both the Sedin and Naslund line. As we've seen of late, Burrows also has some offensive potential.


Now - here are the million dollar questions:


A) Would Kesler and Burrows still be effective WITHOUT playing with one another? (and in a non-checking line role).

B) Is it worth TRYING to split up the hottest duo and hottest checking line on the Canucks right now (Kesler and Burrows) with the HOPE of igniting your THREE (four if you include Morrison) top offensive threats?

User avatar
dangler
CC 1st Team All-Star
Posts: 927
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: Commercial Drive Coffee shop

Post by dangler » Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:06 pm

IMO the Sedins need another line to be a consistent scoring threat,so the other teams can't focus solely on shutting down the Sedins,thus giving them more scoring opportunities.
The Kesler/Burrows line could be that other line.
Retool Rebuild

User avatar
Grizzly
MVP
MVP
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Dawson Creek

Post by Grizzly » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:00 pm

... not sure I would want to separate those two as they are our only flicker of offence right now ...

How about giving Kesler and Burrows the #1 ice time and most of the time as the #1 unit on the PP for a while to see if the interest can be sparked back into the Sedin's as they watch a while ... ?? Or is it just the time of year when all the sluggin' is tough and the Sedin's just have to push through the adversity ... give them more ice time ??

Grizz

User avatar
the toucan kid
CC Legend
Posts: 3923
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:50 am

Post by the toucan kid » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:12 pm

No way you split them up, they actually have chemistry. Naslund is beyond sparking, he just doesn't have the ability any longer, stop beating a dead hore, it's almost over. As for the Sedins Kesler's game is all speed (lets be honest his hands in tight and his shot aren't great) so no fit there if you ask me.

User avatar
mattola
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 1853
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:44 am

Post by mattola » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:31 pm

what I would like to try is

D Sedin - Morrison - Raymond
Naslund - H Sedin - Pyatt
Burrows - Kesler -Shannon
Isbister - Ritchie - Pettinger

User avatar
mattola
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 1853
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:44 am

Post by mattola » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:32 pm

the toucan kid wrote:stop beating a dead hore.

I know you meant Horse. but man oh man it made me laugh seeing Hore....

User avatar
the toucan kid
CC Legend
Posts: 3923
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:50 am

Post by the toucan kid » Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:36 pm

:shock: time to start proof-reading. Stupid political scandals...

Canuck2
CC Veteran
Posts: 90
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 2:16 pm

Post by Canuck2 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:28 am

Speaking about the two, they are in the top ten:

link

Post Reply