October / November OOTS

Welcome to the main forum of our site. Anything and everything to do with the Vancouver Canucks is dicussed and debated here.

Moderator: Referees

User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 13536
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: October OOTS

Post by Mickey107 »

Reefer2 wrote:So does Bergeron take the fall in Montreal?

Maybe time to trade Price?
I can't believe how bad Weber looks. :?:
"evolution"
ESQ
MVP
MVP
Posts: 3162
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:34 pm

Re: October OOTS

Post by ESQ »

5thhorseman wrote:
Reefer2 wrote:Is Edmonton scared yet, down 3 - 0 in the 1st period.

Toronto flukes out another win.
I wonder how long you guys are going to call this a fluke.
Probably until they get their first injury and stop fluking out.

I mean, the Canucks have already lost their #1D and a top-6 winger (...ok, top-9 winger) for 4-6 weeks, and its only been 5 games!

...unless you think their current results are for real, and they'll go 72-6 for the year?
User avatar
5thhorseman
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2389
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:04 am

Re: October OOTS

Post by 5thhorseman »

ESQ wrote:
5thhorseman wrote:
Reefer2 wrote:Is Edmonton scared yet, down 3 - 0 in the 1st period.

Toronto flukes out another win.
I wonder how long you guys are going to call this a fluke.
Probably until they get their first injury and stop fluking out.

I mean, the Canucks have already lost their #1D and a top-6 winger (...ok, top-9 winger) for 4-6 weeks, and its only been 5 games!

...unless you think their current results are for real, and they'll go 72-6 for the year?
I think posters are just too consumed by their hate and aren't thinking straight. Plus, Reefer has been hitting the sauce a bit too much lately :-P
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20435
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: October OOTS

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

ESQ wrote:
5thhorseman wrote:
Reefer2 wrote:Is Edmonton scared yet, down 3 - 0 in the 1st period.

Toronto flukes out another win.
I wonder how long you guys are going to call this a fluke.
Probably until they get their first injury and stop fluking out.

I mean, the Canucks have already lost their #1D and a top-6 winger (...ok, top-9 winger) for 4-6 weeks, and its only been 5 games!

...unless you think their current results are for real, and they'll go 72-6 for the year?
Tanev isn’t hurt and Eriksson has had zero impact since July 2, 2016
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Island Nucklehead
MVP
MVP
Posts: 8362
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:27 pm
Location: Ottawa

Re: October OOTS

Post by Island Nucklehead »

That McDavid spin-o-rama on Keith was a thing of beauty.
User avatar
DonCherry4PM
MVP
MVP
Posts: 1441
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 10:27 pm

Re: October OOTS

Post by DonCherry4PM »

http://www.tsn.ca/bruins-d-mcquaid-out- ... s-1.891032

Apparently Boeser's shot is pretty hard. Definitely looked like the shots hurt, but didn't think they actually broke McQuaid's leg.
Invincibility lies in oneself.
Vincibility lies in the enemy.

- Sun Tzu
User avatar
Cousin Strawberry
MVP
MVP
Posts: 12921
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: in the shed with a fresh packed bowl

Re: October OOTS

Post by Cousin Strawberry »

DonCherry4PM wrote:http://www.tsn.ca/bruins-d-mcquaid-out- ... s-1.891032

Apparently Boeser's shot is pretty hard. Definitely looked like the shots hurt, but didn't think it actually broke McQuaid's leg.
Good. Fuck you mcQuaid you piece of shit. Somewhere around cock ring Mason is smiling from under the brim of his stetson
If you need air...call it in
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 13536
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: October OOTS

Post by Mickey107 »

DonCherry4PM wrote:http://www.tsn.ca/bruins-d-mcquaid-out- ... s-1.891032

Apparently Boeser's shot is pretty hard. Definitely looked like the shots hurt, but didn't think they actually broke McQuaid's leg.
Nobody has really been able to explain this but any goalie you talk to will say there is a difference.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/com ... slap_shot/
"evolution"
User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2933
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: October OOTS

Post by Aaronp18 »

micky107 wrote:
DonCherry4PM wrote:http://www.tsn.ca/bruins-d-mcquaid-out- ... s-1.891032

Apparently Boeser's shot is pretty hard. Definitely looked like the shots hurt, but didn't think they actually broke McQuaid's leg.
Nobody has really been able to explain this but any goalie you talk to will say there is a difference.
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/com ... slap_shot/
Actually if you read that link a user mentions a very plausible explanation - the amount of spin the player places on the puck. An increase in RPMs would equate to more energy transfer upon impact. Radar guns will only measure linear velocity not rotation.

I was thinking of another possibility as well, goalies will tell you a player hides his shot well. Meaning it's hard to pick up the release point of the shot, I would wager a guess that these players seem to have a heavier shot. What likely happens is that the goalie has a harder time picking up the puck on a shot and has less time to prepare for impact. So he isn't flexing muscles at the same time as he would for a shot that is easier to pick up!
User avatar
Mickey107
MVP
MVP
Posts: 13536
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:27 am
Location: Richmond, B.C.

Re: October OOTS

Post by Mickey107 »

I remember that most shots I blocked, no matter how fast, if the puck was spinning it would usually deflect off the shin pads and not hurt but if the puck had no spin the impact was painful like a hammer.
"evolution"
User avatar
rats19
Moderator & MVP
Moderator & MVP
Posts: 11116
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:21 am
Location: over here.....

Re: October OOTS

Post by rats19 »

AP it's like some guys throw a " heavy" ball right. I don't know the answer but it's real


A "heavy ball" is one that has late movement and hits the receiver's glove in a non-sweet spot. It hurts the hand, and the ball can feel like it weighs a pound when that happens. Hence the term, "Heavy ball."

The above makes sense to me
Silence intelligence so stupid isn’t offended….
User avatar
Chef Boi RD
MVP
MVP
Posts: 19469
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 6:36 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: October OOTS

Post by Chef Boi RD »

American hockey is trending - Matthews, Keller, Wetenski, Gaudreau, Eichel, McAvoy, Tkachuk, Boeser etc while Canadians are busting badly Reinhart, Bennett, Dal Colle, Strome, Virtanen, McKinnon, Dubios, Hayden Fleury. It's just McDavid all by himself against American hockey
“Tyler Myers is my guy... I was taking to Scotty Bowman last night and he was bringing up his name, and saying he’s a big guy and big guy need big minutes to play, he is playing great for ya… and I agree with him… He’s been exceptional” - Bruce Boudreau
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20435
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: October OOTS

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

rats19 wrote:AP it's like some guys throw a " heavy" ball right. I don't know the answer but it's real


A "heavy ball" is one that has late movement and hits the receiver's glove in a non-sweet spot. It hurts the hand, and the ball can feel like it weighs a pound when that happens. Hence the term, "Heavy ball."

The above makes sense to me
Yep , some guys throw 90 and it’s meh ..other guys throw 90 and it’s fucking cement mixers
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Blob Mckenzie
MVP
MVP
Posts: 20435
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:34 pm
Location: Oakalla

Re: October OOTS

Post by Blob Mckenzie »

RoyalDude wrote:American hockey is trending - Matthews, Keller, Wetenski, Gaudreau, Eichel, McAvoy, Tkachuk, Boeser etc while Canadians are busting badly Reinhart, Bennett, Dal Colle, Strome, Virtanen, McKinnon, Dubios, Hayden Fleury. It's just McDavid all by himself against American hockey
Horrible post
“I don’t care what you and some other poster were talking about”
User avatar
Aaronp18
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2933
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: October OOTS

Post by Aaronp18 »

rats19 wrote:AP it's like some guys throw a " heavy" ball right. I don't know the answer but it's real


A "heavy ball" is one that has late movement and hits the receiver's glove in a non-sweet spot. It hurts the hand, and the ball can feel like it weighs a pound when that happens. Hence the term, "Heavy ball."

The above makes sense to me
Exactly!

Actually a pitcher is a perfect example. Some guys hide the ball extremly well when they throw, it’s hard to pick up because of their delivery. The ball isn’t moving any faster than other pitchers but because it’s harder to pick up it seemingly gets there faster.
Post Reply